These ones Galen put together are pretty interesting: http://gallery.socionix.com/composites/

Quote Originally Posted by EyeSeeCold View Post
It's assumed that Filatova's portraits are valid aggregations of each types' representative structural facial compositions, with this assumption, her portraits are already preferred over any typed person's photograph as we'd have to make another assumption that those were accurate typings.
Assume.

Also, it is not like anyone is "all obsessed with seeing the world through cartoons or something", if it were, everyone would be "all obsessed with seeing the world through cartoons or something", which they're not.
Okay.

Lastly, your annoyance is a personal problem, it'd be wise to seek therapeutic help instead of displacing your frustration here, or at least remove yourself from contact with the input.
Thanks, Dr. Phil.