Type portraits from socionics.org (visual identification)

[Azeroffs]

...

The ILE portrait reminds me of you.

[mfckr]

Why can't you people just use real photographs? Fuck, it's like you're all obsessed with seeing the world through cartoons or something. Annoying.

I agree kindof. But the thing is that these drawings capture something that cannot always be seen in photographs.

More than likely, they just give you ample free range to overindulge your imagination to a point of self-bamboozlement.

They are like an image of what the type looks like, generalized from many different individuals or from observations of the same individual over time. That's what I like about these drawings.

You assume.

I can match these drawings to my mental image of certain people but not necessarily to a single photograph. Well, at least something like that.

Lol.

[EyeSeeCold]

Why can't you people just use real photographs? Fuck, it's like you're all obsessed with seeing the world through cartoons or something. Annoying.

It's assumed that Filatova's portraits are valid aggregations of each types' representative structural facial compositions, with this assumption, her portraits are already preferred over any typed person's photograph as we'd have to make another assumption that those were accurate typings. Also, it is not like anyone is "all obsessed with seeing the world through cartoons or something", if it were, everyone would be "all obsessed with seeing the world through cartoons or something", which they're not. Lastly, your annoyance is a personal problem, it'd be wise to seek therapeutic help instead of displacing your frustration here, or at least remove yourself from contact with the input.

[mfckr]

These ones Galen put together are pretty interesting: http://gallery.socionix.com/composites/

It's assumed that Filatova's portraits are valid aggregations of each types' representative structural facial compositions, with this assumption, her portraits are already preferred over any typed person's photograph as we'd have to make another assumption that those were accurate typings.

Assume.

Also, it is not like anyone is "all obsessed with seeing the world through cartoons or something", if it were, everyone would be "all obsessed with seeing the world through cartoons or something", which they're not.

Okay.

Lastly, your annoyance is a personal problem, it'd be wise to seek therapeutic help instead of displacing your frustration here, or at least remove yourself from contact with the input.

Thanks, Dr. Phil.

[717495]

The ILE portrait reminds me of you.

What makes you say that?

Why can't you people just use real photographs?

Ye.

It's assumed that Filatova's portraits are valid aggregations of each types' representative structural facial compositions, with this assumption, her portraits are already preferred over any typed person's photograph as we'd have to make another assumption that those were accurate typings.

Nah.

[stray]

I kind of want to be SEI atm over IEI, because I dress more like The Dude or Depp in Secret Window. Pajama aesthetic. IEI sounds all poetic and high maintenance and shit.

I don't waddle like a penguin or look like the Happy Days dad though.

[Azeroffs]

The ILE portrait reminds me of you.

What makes you say that?

*shrug* it just does. Not that it means anything.

Kinda reminds me of some of your pics.