Model Discussion split from "New Type Representatives" thread

[Marie84]

I don't use any model because modeling Socionics is pointless. Too many unknowns and insufficient evidence to substantially back anything. Strict adherence to any model will lead to unrealistic conclusions at the present stage of development.

DCNH seems to most closely approximate a significant chunk of my outlook though. Overall, I'm more of an eclectic who borrows components from various theories, models, and ideas that I deem useful.

If you don't use a Model than what do you call this?

Like this.

from that, it looks like you still follow a system to type (which is by default immanent in typology) it's just that you took bits and pieces that made sense to you and fit them into a new self-coherent approach to typing.
In other words, this isn't part of "mainstream" Socionics that WorkaholicsAnon stated it is, whether it's right or wrong, though, is debatable of course