Quote Originally Posted by Ashton2 View Post
It's not a 'new way' of looking at type—you've probably never taken the time to see how much overlap of agreement there actually is. If you did, you'd likely find out that there's nothing radically divergent going on. I might disagree on a few 'mainstream' typings, but what of it? The Socionists disagree with each other often too, if you haven't noticed.

There's no 1 tried and true way of looking at this stuff and so-called "classical socionics" is far from being a coherent, established paradigm. So you may as well cease w/ the brainwashing newspeak here.
In my opinion, the differences between your typings and the "mainstream" are significant enough to say that you belong to a distinct "school" of socionics. All I'm saying is that the newbs should be aware of that when deciding who to believe. Confusion doesn't help either side.