This isn't overtly complex? http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ted-edits.html
You're still describing Ti, Ti with no Ne to be specific. That entire process of removing structural ambiguity to create a more logically consistent one has nothing to do with how Te works, at least I have never read anything that suggests so
This is where I must strongly agree to disagree, because I don't see anything practical in taking a bunch of theoretical information from a system and than revamping it into yet another theoretical system that can only be measured for accuracy by your own subjectivityThat initial practical approach really has very little to do with Ti. It doesn't even involve much thinking. More like deciding for it's own sake.
Well actually I think I'm being biased, since Ti can use that type of mental organization for productive purposes