LIE-Ni or LIE-Te? Also, why does he have this very nerdy vibe? When I think of a LIE I think of Mickey Rourke or Annie Lennox.Originally Posted by Marep
LIE-Ni or LIE-Te? Also, why does he have this very nerdy vibe? When I think of a LIE I think of Mickey Rourke or Annie Lennox.
I saw that he was recently called “LII-Ti” in some thread by a forumite that name-drops functions as an explanation for whatever typing he has in mind and blocks any discussion with his excuse of “Ni pattern reading”. So he fails in the theory and his patterns are actually more like doodles. What a unique talent.
Gates is Gamma NT, not LII. He's a Dynamic type, not a Static Ti type so he's not going to attract Ti-suggestives with “clear and concise explanations of concepts, rather than a lot of background information about them that is not directly pertinent” any time soon. Just compare the way he talks with the way LII Angela Merkel talks. Also by its very nature Static Ti gives off an impression of conclusiveness whereas Dynamics (the ones in the 'victim' category at least) give a more subtle impression of “openness” with all the comings and goings, the speaker being dragged by the tide of all the commotion, all the ‘flowing’ and expansion.
Gulenko types Static Merkel and Musk LII and LSI respectively and Dynamic Zuckerberg and Gates ILI and LIE. He sure likes his Reinin.
Subject any ESE to this Te/Ni “noise” for too long and they'll gladly be out the door:
Sicuramente cercherai il significato di questo.
Reply With Quote
