For the most part. I can tell when a guy is handsome or cute. I can tell that most guys are ugly. It has the same effect on me as noticing a pretty girl. I found a guy attractive once, but he was ILI, not IEI.Originally Posted by Typhon
For the most part. I can tell when a guy is handsome or cute. I can tell that most guys are ugly. It has the same effect on me as noticing a pretty girl. I found a guy attractive once, but he was ILI, not IEI.
So you are lesbian, for the most part?
Certainly not. I can't even bond with a female as a best friend. I'm more likely to become a nun than get interested in a girl like that.
ok ok
I'm attracted to my conflictors, but it's their personality that draws me in. It's definitely not a sex thing ... or is it? Hmmm.
(I don't know anything anymore, don't listen to me. I may not even have a Socionics type of my own. Maybe I just float around like a nontypable unstructured entity.)
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
In my case it's both, and I don't know what to make of it... Can't help but wondering if it's mistyping, because so far there seems to be an instinctual connection thing going on.I'm attracted to my conflictors, but it's their personality that draws me in. It's definitely not a sex thing ... or is it? Hmmm.
(I don't know anything anymore, don't listen to me. I may not even have a Socionics type of my own. Maybe I just float around like a nontypable unstructured entity.)
It makes me wonder if i'm mistyping people, then I think fuck it stop analysing and just go with it.
For instance, for myself, say for instance I meet a girl and I really like her, maybe my mind will start thinking about stuff we can do in the future, holidays, nights in, out.... but it's just the start and plenty of time to get to know each other if it's going to work. For myself I kinda see taking analysing their type too seriously, it could still turn out that socionics kinda works and the person turns out to be my dual, but they can still piss me off for non-socionic reasons.
I've also found that 'instinctual connection' occurs when i've got similar hobbies and in the early finding person attractive stage, hormones and shit more potent than the mind.
LOL; I'm reading your post. It was the same for me in the past but the more interactions I have with my duals the more my conflictor interactions don't please me. Like today I met my friend and her SLE husband for a beer and for a moment he suspected that the cheap bottle on their bookstore was not broken by his cats (I was baby sitting for his cats while they were out of town and found a blue bottle broken on the floor when I went in to feed them). These instances or moments that he's looking for a "reaction" or Fe that assures him that I did not do it come across to me like he doesn't trust me and have faith in what I'm telling him is the truth. I can't produce Fe for him so instead his response, like saying "It's not like our cats to jump up on the book shelf and break something" came off WRONG to me because it hit my Se polr -Him trying to read me and my motives. ARGH. My dual wouldn't give a rats ass about some cheap ass blue bottle that anyone would have broken and would have instead been concerned about someone getting hurt. Anyway, just a small situation of how Fi and Fe work differently and how that particular response can sneak into my feelings and hurt me on the inside to the point where I will hold onto his response for a long long time, later on bringing it up and causing conflict; hence, conflicting relationship.I'm attracted to my conflictors, but it's their personality that draws me in. It's definitely not a sex thing ... or is it? Hmmm.
(I don't know anything anymore, don't listen to me. I may not even have a Socionics type of my own. Maybe I just float around like a nontypable unstructured entity.)
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
LOL! Turn that into a hilarious insider for yourself and see his noodle work overtime. Be like, "Hey now that I think of it, I did see pinky eyeballing that shiny blue bottle that was sitting on the bookshelf." What can he say haha
This is why you need an Fi, so he can know right off the bat you're not attracted to him
This isn't a fair question because Hugh Laurie is objectively hot :/
xE
Yes! ESI girls tend to be HOT but annoying
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
--> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
I can vouch for that!
Te-INTp/ILI, my wife: Fi-ISFj/ESI, with laser beam death rays for ESTp/SLEs, lol
16 years of bliss in an Activity relationship
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
