Results 1 to 40 of 147

Thread: Examples of possible famous/celebrity LSEs-ESTjs

Hybrid View

  1. 03-14-2012, 06:07 AM #1
    Galen
    Galen is offline
    you can go to where your heart is Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    8,458
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    In relative reverse order to me adding them to my list:

    Tea Leoni
    Charles Ingram
    Hermann Cain
    Nellie Bly
    Enya
    Ty Murray
    Laura Ingraham
    Brett Favre
    Kate Mulgrew
    Ellen McLain
    Prince Charles
    Gareth Thomas
    Richard Chamberlain
    Joanna Gleason
    Melissa Sue Anderson
    George Takei
    Nigel Farage (possibly ESFj?)
    Chris Martin
    Jane Curtin
    Neil DeGrasse Tyson
    Ron Perlman
    Ian Anderson
    Hugh Jackman
    Sean Bean
    Ryan Stiles
    Phil Collins
    Michael Caine
    Felicity Huffman
    Annette Bening
    Katherine Hepburn
    Melissa Joan Hart
    Jude Dench
    Bruce Willis
    Martha Stewart
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 03-14-2012, 06:20 AM #2
    717495
    717495 is offline
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    Enya
    Oh gosh Enya yes




    P.S. I have another LSE typelist brewing though not sure anyone has heard of these people
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 03-16-2012, 01:52 AM #3
    Beautiful sky
    Beautiful sky is offline
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by polikujm View Post
    Oh gos
    I think she looks more SLI
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?

    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules