I toss them in delicious strawberry sauce and give them a nice spin in the powdered sugar.
I toss them in delicious strawberry sauce and give them a nice spin in the powdered sugar.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
by far and with absolutely no contest this is the most intelligent post you have ever madeOriginally Posted by Maritsa33
in fact i go so far as to say it is not the dumbest post in this very threead
x
Read lots and lots of Socionics articles
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
--> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Yeah seems like it, from all your mistypings.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Visual typing based on temperament and what that means for how they hold and move their body and stuff, and their energy levels. I narrow it down to club by interview if it just hasn't sprung out to me that they're a particular type after I've narrowed it down with temperament.
I think each type has a certain look/feel. LIEs and LSEs are very distinctive, for example, as is Fe dominance.
Of course this can lead to tricky cases where I don't know someone enough to fire a good type interview but know them too well to a degree where I overthink little things that throw my typing off. Also DCNH subtypes can screw with temperament diagnosis. Cultural/social aspects can also mess with club... etc.
Everybody types differently. That's why everyone's always wrong in the other person's eyes.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote