So, Drake, please don't kill me!
I will not.

I know Drake is actually just joking, but I am writing this here just to make an indication about INFjs and their style of logic through my own observation.
I'm not joking. I made an objective statement, but it's a logical fallacy. Just on few examples I concluded, and based on a profile description of INFJs having as their third function, that it's worth for ALL cases.

I also know an INFJ professor or psychology who doesn't use short logical statements as conclusions to what he knows. Instead, he's very descriptive by giving lots of examples and putting references to other authors. The point is that he doesn't extract important information out of everything he reffers to. Almost alway, that's very hard to follow because of information crisis that INFJ creates.



INTJs, correct me if I'm wrong.