Has anyone taken this before? You have to type the url into google and have it translate for you...http://sociotest.narod.ru/info.htm
Like always, I get...INTp
Has anyone taken this before? You have to type the url into google and have it translate for you...http://sociotest.narod.ru/info.htm
Like always, I get...INTp
I got EII.
phobic 6w5 sp/so/sx (tri-type: 6w5/1w9/4w5)
Fi-ESI
I believe this test is more accurate than the one I created some days ago, because of what I stated in the spoiler, and also because of its concise descriptiveness, in comparison more expansive, despite a few minor translation problems.
I got Robespierre, but as usual, I was able to tell what the questions were asking, and pick the "correct" ones.
Quaero Veritas.
ENFp here, although one of the later questions was more of a random selection than anything else
Retook it and got ISFj lol
What a shitty test.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Maritsa you need your diaper changed.
Your type, - Napoleon.
What!
You have a creative approach to issues of volitional manifestations, understanding what should and what not to do. We are confident in themselves, are able to master the space, to subordinate the people to their influence.
Acting ethical method, skillfully forging relationships with people, do not hesitate in the manifestation of feelings. Love at the center of attention in noisy companies.
Able to win, showing interest in the problems of the interlocutor, sensitivity and empathy. Try to find out a person's ability, admired his talent.
Frequently shows a certain illogicality in the statements and actions, but is unlikely to admit their mistake. Sometimes you can not objectively understand the complex issues.
Usually you have carefully listened to arguments about the variability of all things in time, as well as on what the outcome of this or that prepared for the event.
Evaluating any phenomenon, at the heart you put his ability to benefit. Think: well what is advantageous and cost-effectively and the desire to save and stewardship.
lol
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yesenin?
No he died, but he's not dead.
who is Yesenin? :/
Sergei Yesenin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am as real as the thunder in your thighs.
herm.. why are you questioning if he's dead if you know he's dead? >.> <.<
ah, well i didn't even know who it was so i guess that tells you lol :/ that is probably a bad thing D:
He's an INFp exemplar.
oh okay, makes me feel a little better then
It all comes down to how much dirt you're willing to chip away.
Some of those questions could have gone either way for me but I clearly prefer N over S. So xNxx
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Your type - Don QuixoteСкорее всего, Вы склонны к отвлеченным размышлениям, исследованию абстрактных вопросов.Most likely, you are prone to abstract thinking, the study of abstract questions.Полны необыкновенных идей.Full of unusual ideas.Однако часто не можете достаточно четко их изложить. Идеи остаются несколько туманными, "интуитивными".However, it often can not clearly enough to describe. Ideas are somewhat vague, "intuitive".
Вы умеете видеть интересные, перспективные возможности, открывающиеся в изучении объективного мира.You are able to see interesting and promising opportunities to explore the objective world.При определенных условиях, такой человек, как Вы может стать создателем совершенно новой, революционной научной теории.Under certain conditions, such a man as you can be the creator of an entirely new and revolutionary scientific theory.
Чаще Вы действуете последовательно, свои поступки логически увязываете один с другим, выстраиваете в четкую систему, направленную на реализацию Ваших идей.Most often you are acting consistently, their actions are logically linking one to another, lined up a clear system aimed at the realization of your ideas.
Можете быть хорошим организатором, предпочитаете руководить коллективом, перед которым стоят достаточно глобальные и перспективные цели.Can be a good organizer, prefer to manage a team faced quite global and long-range goals.
Стремитесь к тому, чтобы окружающие видели в Вас деятельного, волевого человека.Strive to ensure that others see you as active, strong-willed person.В экстремальных ситуациях не боитесь внешнего давления, смело идете "против течения", доводя до конца начатую Вами линию.In extreme situations, not afraid of external pressure, boldly going "upstream", leading to the end of the line you started.Одевается, как представляется, достаточно интересно, при этом обычно придерживаетесь строгого вкуса.Dresses seemed interesting enough, it usually adhere to a strict taste.
Возможно, что Вы плохо ориентируетесь во взаимоотношениях между людьми.It is possible that you are targeting poorly in relationships between people.И, даже,And, evenиспытываете неуверенность в вопросах этики, стараясь обходить их молчанием.feel uncertain about the ethics of trying to pass them over in silence.Серьезная проблема, стоящая перед Вами, - это склонность к поступкам, которые другие иногда могут посчитать не совсем этичными.A serious problem facing you - it's prone to behavior that others can sometimes find not just ethical.Тем более что Вы очень болезненно реагируете на замечания по данным аспектам.The more you react very sensitively to the comments on these aspects.
Вы нуждаетесь в красивой, гармонической обстановке, и, часто, с удовольствием принимаете участие в беседах, касающиеся вопросов эстетики.You need a beautiful, harmonious surroundings, and often happy to take part in discussions concerning matters of aesthetics.
Похоже, Вы уверены в том, что хороший разговор обязательно должен быть живым и эмоциональным.It seems that you believe that a good conversation must be alive and emotional.Симпатизируете людям, демонстрирующим яркие эмоции.Sympathize for people who demonstrate vivid emotions.От таких людей Вы эмоционально "подзаряжаетесь", черпая в них источник вдохновения для дальнейшего творчества.From these people you are emotionally "recharged" by drawing them into a source of inspiration for further creativity.
Чаще всего, Вы не делите людей на своих и чужих.Most often, you do not divide people into friends and foes.Всем стараетесь быть одинаково полезным.All trying to be equally useful.
Last edited by Nexus; 10-25-2010 at 05:25 AM.
I got Robespierre/LII and then Balzac/ILI. I didn't like it, it was too short. I think for people who have read so much about socionics like us, there are not tests left which could give any new insights.
Tests are for beginners.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Thanks...
lol. I got LSI
"We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.".
The first question was hard for me to answer as well. I got ESI the first time I took it, ILI the second.
i got sle this time
Probably it is necessary to consider distinctions in mentality, language skills, a social status etc.
It - both questions and variants of answers...
Gives me LIE/LSE.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
LSE.
Hehe, I'm so smart, I can't even believe it
Last edited by Absurd; 10-24-2011 at 05:27 PM.
Retook, got IEI.
Why can't the Russians learn that there is no such thing as a good type test?