I believe this test is more accurate than the one I created some days ago, because of what I stated in the spoiler, and also because of its concise descriptiveness, in comparison more expansive, despite a few minor translation problems.
I believe this test is more accurate than the one I created some days ago, because of what I stated in the spoiler, and also because of its concise descriptiveness, in comparison more expansive, despite a few minor translation problems.
I got Robespierre, but as usual, I was able to tell what the questions were asking, and pick the "correct" ones.
Quaero Veritas.
ENFp here, although one of the later questions was more of a random selection than anything else
Retook it and got ISFj lol
What a shitty test.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Maritsa you need your diaper changed.
Your type, - Napoleon.
What!
You have a creative approach to issues of volitional manifestations, understanding what should and what not to do. We are confident in themselves, are able to master the space, to subordinate the people to their influence.
Acting ethical method, skillfully forging relationships with people, do not hesitate in the manifestation of feelings. Love at the center of attention in noisy companies.
Able to win, showing interest in the problems of the interlocutor, sensitivity and empathy. Try to find out a person's ability, admired his talent.
Frequently shows a certain illogicality in the statements and actions, but is unlikely to admit their mistake. Sometimes you can not objectively understand the complex issues.
Usually you have carefully listened to arguments about the variability of all things in time, as well as on what the outcome of this or that prepared for the event.
Evaluating any phenomenon, at the heart you put his ability to benefit. Think: well what is advantageous and cost-effectively and the desire to save and stewardship.
lol
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yesenin?
Be a man! You can do it!Originally Posted by Melody Man
Suitable result of testing?
Means - the test magnificent...
It is not pleasant - shit...
Last edited by Reset; 10-17-2011 at 11:37 AM.
Welcome to the16types.infoSuitable result of testing?
Means - the test magnificent...
It is not pleasant - shit...
Thanks...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
