Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Stratiyevskaya: ESFp

  1. #1
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    United Kingdom
    30 Post(s)
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Stratiyevskaya: ESFp

    Block Of ego*y-ya pozitsiya*Programmnaya function * "volitional sensorika"
    For the man of this type are characteristic the volitional protection of its own interests (and of the interests of "their command"), the protection of its own priority by any price. But not for the purpose of direct and merciless suppression, but for the maximum realization of its own creative and ethical potential, for the most complete expression of its own bright individuality, for the realization of its own ethical purposes and tasks.

    Therefore the ratio of forces in the system of the values of Caesar - this is first of all the competition of personal achievements and successes. To Caesar is important the acknowledgement of his personal merits importantly the acknowledgement of his authority through the realization of his personal qualities acknowledgement by his most sensitive and most thoughtful leader, by the most energetic and most active acknowledgement by his most loyal and most reliable friend acknowledgement by his best and most unsurpassed in his kind worker.

    No matter by what it neither would be occupied, whatever activity for itself nor selected. Caesar always poses for himself the problem of being best of the good by himself purpose very praiseworthy and deserving respect, but from other side - what physical forces he is worthwhile to live entire life as on the sport contest being constantly examined to the rivals, constantly comparing its own successes with the strange achievements, constant stress in the eternal tendency to be pulled out forward and not to yield superiority.

    Caesar tries easily and rapidly to attain the stated goals Uvlechenno being occupied by the selected matter, without considering those spent for achievement of success by efforts, Caesar it is capable to the exceptional fitness for work and on any, even contradicting the common sense victims. (for example, one of the representatives of this type, the beginning singer "placed" to itself voice, being occupied simultaneously in three instructors of vokala unfortunately, result it did not justify the spent efforts.)

    Without a moment's hesitation about that which risks to seem by boastful, Caesar at every turn "reports" about his achievements, sometimes sufficiently sincerely being surprised so that others lag behind his "model" rates: "as, you yet did not make this task? But 4 already following I make!" It seemingly proposes in any matter "to be equal" to it. And in fact, why no? Caesar magnificently knows how to impose the spirit of creative competition and business activity on the most passive and most indifferent to the general enthusiasm person. It will force to podsuyetit'sya the most passive and the inactive (what extreme point of samootstranennosti and passiveness would reach its dual Balzac, if not exceptional enthusiasm and the hyper-activity of Caesar)

    Caesar always condemns and blames passiveness, absence of initiative, retreat from the selected plans in the people. It cannot be said so that Caesar would clearly encourage the skill "to work by elbows" - it is faster, it encourages the skill "to fight, to search for, to find and not to surrender". Caesar does not respect those, who pass before the difficulties. He always for the active stand in life, for the active search for the solutions sometimes the methods, which he proposes for the solution of problems, appear somewhat rectilinear. Not that so that it would propose to go and to break into the closed doors (although this also is not excluded), to defend its rights by any possible method, to attain that outlined with any conditions, this already without fail.

    To Caesar it is actually important to know, what problems are solved by the method of volitional pressure, and what are not. Therefore, giving advice, to which, possibly, it itself and did not follow, Caesar makes this of the considerations of obtaining information with the important for himself, "program" aspect of "volitional sensoriki". where it is possible "to press", while where - it is cannot.

    In the estimation of potential rivals Caesar first of all in exactly the same manner examines the ability of man to resist the exerted to it pressure, and also the skill to postoyat' for himself and readiness to give immediate rebuff frequently confident in his power superiority or feeling, that the situation "works" on it, Caesar can himself allow "trial falling out" to the side of that, its whose power potential it now interests. The absence of immediate protection sometimes directs it at the erroneous thought, that man is not generally to it capable. Sometimes such prompt conclusions lead it to the very unpleasant situations.

    To Caesar it is extremely unpleasant, when him they publicly "put in place" - this understates its self-appraisal. Is still more absurd the situation, when any generally unfamiliar person for the incomprehensible reasons it attacks. In this case Caesar feels himself very lost. Unfortunately, he is not always capable to rapidly take control over his feelings and to quietly and solidly require explanations.

    Caesar can vividly, sometimes provocatively "state" about himself. He can defy society, it can take to himself the scandalous stage means: for it this not is more than the expression of its own creative individuality. Much more than it disturbs the absence of interest in itself. Unwillingness to note its clearly expressed abilities, unwillingness to recognize its success, unwillingness to obey its leadership.

    Caesar first of all of men of action. Therefore especially painfully it receives any limitation of its activity. (problem, which it fairly often encounters, since its activity bears sufficiently contradictory and confused nature.) Its activity assumes wide spread and scale of measures.

    It is exceptionally initiative-taking, it can literally "break" into the strange life, in the strange relations, because of what the impression of insolent person and impudent person frequently is produced. Frequently there is bestseremonen and it is obtrusive.

    In the tendency to take initiative by any price Caesar frequently appears far from in better shape, because of what sometimes he falls into awkward situation, it is sometimes simply it is pitiful or ridiculous. (about which do not give god to it to say.) There is nothing sicker for Caesar than to see that all its efforts to conquer (precisely to conquer) the authority, popularity or arrangement, lead to the diametrically opposite results. To the honor of Caesar, he knows how to recognize the fact of his own errors and is capable to publicly recognize his fault, although possibly this to it is given more heavily than by other.

    It would be incorrect to say that his ambitions were important for Caesar first of all. The incomprehension of its good intentions is much more offensive for it. In its right to the leadership Caesar it is completely sincerely confident. Therefore the nonrecognition of its priority for it is deeply offensive, since this first of all nonrecognition of its merits, it honest selfless, creative, with the complete return of the forces of labor. If Zhukov has leadership - this is the strategic calculation, where any jamming of its ambitions is received as hostile falling out. Caesar, in contrast to Zhukov, fights not for self assertion of his own ambitions, but for the right to justify the confidence entrusted to it. Simply stated, if to Zhukov is important the sensation of his real authority. To Caesar importantly voluntary acknowledgement and confidence. To Zhukov it is important to take authority. To Caesar it is important to hold leadership. If authority is necessary to Zhukov, in order to head system, then to Caesar in order first of all to maximally realize its creative ethical potential, to democratize the system headed by it, to ethical improve it. If we zhukovskaya strategy - tendency take all spheres of influence, then for Caesar it is important to take "supremacy" in all spheres of its activity: personal merits, in his opinion, even more greatly convince surrounding in its right to the leadership.

    If Zhukov always rigidly checks the seized sphere of influence, then Caesar does not always note that he generally took some space.

    (it should be noted that the comparison of the program functions of Zhukov and Caesar is given for the explanation of fundamental differences in them "volitional sensorikakh", but completely not in order to indicate, who of them a "good" leader, but who "poor" - in each of them his social function, necessary for the realization in the specific situation and under the specified public conditions.)

    Behavior of Caesar first of all are characterized by rapidity and energetic nature, immediate and comprehensive initiative. Caesar for himself unnoticeably fills entire surrounding space. He does not always note, are not always evaluated the methods, which he uses for the fastest achievement of the sympathies: to it is more important to hold his authority, and for this he is ready honest and to ethically work out the undertaken himself obligations.

    The problem of Caesar also in the fact that in contrast to Zhukov, who always knows, "as is must". Caesar distinctly knows only "as not must". With all his exceptional talents Caesar is faster destroyer, than creator. In the policy he is the destroyer of totalitarian and authoritarian systems. In the skill he - daring innovator, who subverts the existing to it kept balance forms. He can be the founder of new direction in the skill, which no one besides it and to continue will be able. To imitate - as much as desired, to continue - no. Among the representatives of this type frequently are encountered bright creative individualities, thoroughly gifted personalities.

    The discrepancy "volitional sensoriki" Caesar consists in very democratism of his autocracy. Caesar sincerely hates tyranny and despotism, it from those, whose name they write "on the fragments of samovlast'ya". And at the same time it by all means attempts not to be inferior its influence. The acknowledgement of its own defeat in this plan for it is especially agonizing. Attempt with any price to hold its influence frequently brings Caesar k. to desperate and contradictory behavior, which have for it frequently tragic consequences.

    Block EGO * 2-4 pozitsiya*Tvorcheskaya function * the "ethics of relations"
    Any ethical relations Caesar first of all constructs from the positions of volitional sensoriki. I.e., however they were developed, Caesar in any event must remain leader. Caesar is deeply convinced that also the first and last word in the development of relations they must remain after it. It is always absolutely confident in its right to check any ethical situation, regardless of the fact, it is in it main face or secondary.

    In spite of comparatively strong ethical installations, and besides, that the ethics of relations - its strong creative function, it cannot be said so that the ethical relations in Caesar would be added easily. To Caesar generally nothing it is given easily, because it everything always conquers. The problem of Caesar in the fact that it frequently conquers that the fact that in it no one disputes. It, to its misfortune, has a habit to conquer that that also so belongs to it precisely rightfully.

    It would seem that it interfere withs Caesar simply and natural to receive its natural attractiveness, its charm, ease and freedom in the contact. But in that and misfortune, that to Caesar is necessary a constant and general acknowledgement of these qualities. Moreover, for it are necessary the proofs of the acknowledged superiority, proof of its unquestionable influence moreover precisely in pursuit of these proofs it and teaches to lose entire its "kingly" sublimity sometimes it is created impression, that it precisely asserts itself to the compliments, by force and inappropriately "pulls" to itself attention, is fascinated by the egotism

    And in the region of ethics to Caesar having insufficiently polupobed only appeared, it must charm all, obayat' all, "light" all, interest all or, if it is necessary, to intrigue all.

    But even if is located someone, whom it is in no way interested to itself to arrange, then only because this person it simply for itself in no way examines, it for it, simply speaking, "empty place".

    It is not surprising that Caesar teaches with this ethics of behavior (independent of the scales of his activity) to gain to itself is numerous enemies. Moreover relations according to diagram friend - enemy in it are also constructed very contrastingly and inconsistently: yesterday's enemy today "gracious" starts into the number of friends, because "so it is must", today's friend, who pays more attention to another subject, no longer friend, but "traitor". (Caesar, perhaps, only, who in third kvadre divides relations into the "enemies" and "friends" - Dreiser it divides into "its" and "strangers", but intuity- logicians about this not at all think)

    Specifically, because the ethics of relations in Caesar is formed under the effect of volitional sensoriki (more precise, it it realizes), maximalism is its distinguishing feature. But, self-evidently, the ethics of Caesar cannot and it must not be sequential: realization function - always manipulation, always such, what is necessary to the program of intellect. In the case of Caesar volitional sensorika - aspect firm, program, and ethics of relations only shapes the "arrangement of forces": changes power relationship - it changes and ethics. To those, whom Caesar respects and whose arrangement attains, one relation, to those, whom "in the half copeck coin it does not place", another. In that and the problem of the ethics of Caesar, the secret of fastest nazhivaniya by them enemies - in its inconsistent ethical maximalism.

    As for a long time Caesar "zastrevayet" in the phase of hostility or friendship, he depends only on concrete situation. But of course Caesar will not step back, until he explains it for himself finally, it is more precise, it will step back, only being convinced that the relations finally were pulled down also he does not have chances to correct them. (to correct, in understanding of Caesar, means again to conquer authority. It is unimportant that precisely it makes - it does request forgiveness or is arranged the scandal: this is not more than means "to straighten" situation in any manner.)

    Etichnost' of Caesar, already in view of its manipulativeness, always relative, in spite of strong ethical installations. I.e., Caesar completely can realize into some of the defined situation, which enters badly (moreover, it it always knows, how it is necessary to enter), but in it is always located "convincing" justification to its own unethical behavior. Neetichnost' in behavior of others Caesar always notes, but far from always he condemns and even in regard to this it does not always speak out. To the honor of Caesar it is necessary to recognize that it is capable to relate with the humor to the strange ethical imperfections.

    Constantly it fights for the expansion of the sphere of its ethical influence. It it is possible to consider its kind by "ethical aggressor". But the actions of Caesar in the zone of their influence are confused, inconsistent and it is often unethical. Constantly changes ethical tactics, change "agents", change friend- enemies, the centers of volitional pressure and emotional action constantly displace. Caesar least of all realizes, that entire proceeding - this is only reaction to its some concrete actions. The more it fusses, the more the situation incandesces, the more it loses strategic orientators in its ethical relations. Finally it entirely is tangled, who to it is now whom, and here he already conducts his ethical "close battle", his some narrow-gauge "shuttle" diplomacy, some primitive poludetskiye intrigues. It is similar, no one knows how so "creatively" to spoil its relations, as this succeeds for Caesar himself.

    In any event, no matter how estimated its behavior, Caesar sincerely wants "so that all would be as better". He actually tries as possible better everything to settle so that all would be contented by him, he tries for all to be good. This position leads either to the contradictory actions from its side or to the absence of any decisive actions, which only aggravates its ethical problems.

    Block Of superego*e-ya position * normative function * the "intuition of possibilities"
    Program "volitional sensorika" constantly requires information on the aspect "intuition of possibilities". To Caesar it is necessary to most accurately estimate possibilities and abilities of each person, entering the circle of his contact, since its own idea about the success in it is erected relative to potential possibilities and successes of its environment.

    To Caesar it is always important to know, on what stage of the realization of their plans his surrounding people are located. For example, in the process of studies Caesar constantly is interested, it does not lag behind others in the fulfillment of training targets. Moreover, he always tries to return work to some of the first, he tries to focus attention of instructors on itself, to create the impression of promising specialist about itself.

    In any situation Caesar is previously interested in positive possibilities. For example, even to the end of studies he tries to explain all possible versions of the distribution of work sites, he searches for for himself some useful business connections, it is interested in the possibilities of other students.

    For obtaining it the information interesting it develops high activity, time finds to have a talk with each about the plans for the future. In this case he tries to take the locating to the revelation "sincere" tone, confidence lamenting to some its yet not solved problems. Frequently opinions on the question of interest to him are gathered on the threshold of the dynamism, it is advised many, but in the final analysis everything are done in its own way.

    He tries to produce the impression of man of foresighted and reasonable. Greatly it loves, when it they are advised, share their plans, although it does not always have enough patience to listen collocutor. Sometimes he tries to produce the impression of man, whom everything about all knows, (sometimes even too it hurries to report the information, which he allegedly knows.) It loves to produce the impression of man, who in the course of all events, sometimes can hint, which in it "everything is gripped". Frequently, clearly exaggerating, he speaks about his influence. Away not to fib or "to poblefovat'".

    For Caesar it is very important from the very beginning of contact to determine the potential of the man: sometimes Caesar evaluates man relative to his subjective abilities, sometimes - relative to the place occupied by it in the society, sometimes - in appearance.

    On the basis of the approximate estimation of situation and potential of characters Caesar sometimes makes possible for himself sufficiently far to exceed the scope of the permissible ethical standards. The intuition of potential possibilities prompts to it, to whom and as it is possible to relate, who and as itself povedet, who is capable to postoyat' for itself, but who is not.

    Sometimes Caesar allows for himself the very causing behavior, which in it is called "to speak truth into the eyes". But since the concept about the truth Caesar has its very relative (at least because this is its personal point of view), most precise (from a psychological point of view) explanation to "searches of truth" - this nothing else but desire ethical and intuitively "to probe" situation. The desire to learn, will descend to it from the hands that that it now makes, and as they will react to this "truth into the eyes".

    Caesar will not carry uncertainty. Therefore sometimes he specially accelerates the crisis of situation in order to make a new arrangement of forces in it and to understand its place in relation system. To understand, who there is who, as him they receive and after whom "him hold".

    To the happiness for itself (and its duala of Balzac), under the conditions of the uncertainty of relations Caesar is not always locked on one partner during this period it it can open for itself the "second front". Subconsiously that disposed to the vulnerable ethics of the emotions of Balzac, Caesar is scared to explain those relations, which it especially values, it fears emotionally "to press" to the partner. Therefore for redistributing the superfluous emotional activity to it is necessary its kind the "fallback position", which it distracts and it makes that with less dependent on the "basic version."

    The tactics of the "second front" forces Caesar to deceive by cunning, to use cunning, to be twisted out from the awkward situations, but it entire this does not love - to it this is inconvenient: this degrades its merit, it contradicts its ethical principles, the main things from which - decency, honesty and devotion. Furthermore, the weak intuition of the possibilities for it of this does not allow: it always fears conviction in the lie, fears, which will involuntarily give out itself, which will let out a secret, that this will become some means known to its partner. And nevertheless, since it is not always capable to consecutively relations with all its partners, the uncertainty of situation frequently forces it to maneuver between them - it simply does not see for itself another output.

    The analysis of the possibilities of situation in Caesar frequently is too surface or too optimistic, since it assembles information not of the very authoritative sources and evaluates by its not most critical means. For example, many representatives of this type unconditionally believe to the media, even if those extend completely improbable rumors.

    Sometimes Caesar develops the role of person, who confidently looks in the future, vidyashchego for himself and for others the mass of possibilities. Frequently he and itself in this case is inspired and tries to inspire those surrounding. However, after encountering with the first real, objective obstacles, about his "enthusiasm" he forgets in the manner that as if it and not it was never. Then the feverish search for possible output from the difficult situation already begins.

    Error on the aspect of the "intuition of possibilities" bypasses Caesar very dearly: at best - these are the separate unpleasant situations, into which it risks to fall, in the worse - this is the crash of entire its quarries. Therefore Caesar greatly tries not to make anything such, which subsequently would be wrapped up against it. And although it never is to the end confident in its intuition, nevertheless it attempts it to constantly develop in order to have the capability to error-free on it rely.

    The most complete aid on this aspect Caesar nevertheless obtains from his duala of Balzac, who not only knows how to foresee the most unfavorable course of events, but also it can in the soft and delicate form warn against possible troubles. But the method to avoid them at the same time and will prompt.

    Block Of superego*ya-ya Position * Mobilization Function * The "logic Of relationships"
    To Caesar it is difficult to be objective, since it find in the captivity of its ethical installations, its sympathies and antipathies.

    Its behavior can contradict the common sense at least because most frequently they reflect its emotional relation to proceeding.

    Sometimes in Caesar kak's behavior displaces the logical significance of his behavior, i.e. it enters in spite of the common sense, being based to some primitive logical stereotypes only because "it is so accepted to act". Moreover, being guided by its logical stereotypes, it frequently acts to the detriment of its ethical principles: for example, it destroys the prevailing good relations with its close ones only because it reacts in the manner that it is accepted logically, on the general concepts, but not in the manner that he this feels ethical: let us say, it scolds for first, for which it is necessary (in the conventional, stereotype understanding) to scold, it praises for that, for which it is necessary to praise.

    Sometimes this is expressed in the habit to use surface logical (and ethical) stereotypes, to act in accordance with these slogans and to utter them apropos and without the occasion: "pity degrades man", "they fear - it means they respect", "it is jealous - it means it loves", "where postelil, there and sleep", "woman must not display initiative", etc.

    Sometimes these are the logically displaced intonations and accents in the speech. Sometimes this is the ethical unjustified mimicry.

    Sometimes these are the displaced or unstable interests in the received information. For example: listening to explanations, Caesar frequently is distracted from the basic idea, him suddenly they begin to interest some completely secondary moments or unessential details. It is unnoticeable for itself, it moves away from basic theme or distracts by questions of secondary significance. Or by the questions, which do not completely refer to the discussed object.

    One additional characteristic for the representatives of this type the feature: ability apropos and without the occasion to be distracted from the assigned theme to the conversations about itself. (obvious case - Pushkin's lyric retreats in the "Yevgeny Onegin".)

    To be occupied by the classification of concepts or knowledge, to put them into the ordered system - for Caesar dull and mutornaya work. To it it is difficult to be concentrated at the logical analysis of any phenomenon, it is difficult to be concentrated for the sequential understanding of logical conclusions, it is difficult to very to present anything consecutively: it can begin explanation directly from the middle and continue it, constantly returning to the initial and intermediate stages. Thus, in the account of Caesar some even simple explanations are very intricate.

    The superficiality of ideas about its many phenomena does not confuse - it considers this natural ("we everything they learned gradually anything and somehow") the main thing so that the discussed object would be although otdalenno, with sign, it is not possible to produce the impression of complete incompetence.

    It is very careful in the statements, which are concerned the lawful or technical aspect of the matter, it does not risk to seem by nonobjective or incompetent

    It does not love to study instruction and rule - to it this is boring. (representative of this type it can repeatedly burn through electric appliance, including it, without having become acquainted with the instruction it is known the case of "unsuccessful" cleaning of the memory of computer, after which proved to be effaced all placed in it programs) I no matter how was sad its personal experience, nevertheless to Caesar difficult to change themselves, and it frequently relies not on the instruction, in which it is rare and little which understands, but to the success, the luck and to its intuition despite the fact that it fairly often brings it.

    The experience of strange errors also always does not produce on it a sufficient impression Caesar it can as much as desired confer and consult, but in the final analysis he will enter in its own way, despite all councils and common sense. Caesar distinguishes the exceptional ability constantly "to fill lumps" at one and the same place. Deeply to suffer, to suffer and to ask in all and each, why this every time occurs precisely with it, and what deficiencies it should in itself eliminate so that these misfortunes finally would cease they be required colossal patience and endurance (qualities, inherent in its dualu to Balzac) in order to train Caesar to analyze the experience of past errors, i.e. the very thing, what Caesar, in spite of the desire of those surrounding, to make decisively rejects (and you do not request, and do not persuade!) It entered and enters only, as it will deem necessary to it, but otherwise it simply cannot be itself itself.

    For Caesar the need for thoroughly thinking over its behavior, behaving prudently presents serious problem and it is reasonable. Observations in the illogicality of its own actions it does not transfer the requirement to be sequential in its actions is derived it from itself. For it to characteristically act wisely and logically only until this from it they require, until they respect it also they are considered it. But it is worthwhile to only accentuate attention in its illogicality, as all its actions immediately they cease logically to be checked and acquire the nature of disorderly, panicky fuss.

    The charges of Caesar in the illogicality only aggravate his problems. Itself Caesar very painfully transfers any criticism in his address, and since requirements for themselves in it are sufficiently overstated, to it it is difficult to recognize with the presence of all its merits this deficiency as faulty logic. Caesar it generally is desirable to be man without the deficiencies. (A whom of this it does not want?) Therefore Caesar greatly survives, when they give low estimation to his mental abilities. To it it is very difficult to allow itself not to be cleverest (although this is better, that it can for itself make).

    It must be noted that to Caesar to more easily be sequential and logical in its behavior after it was dismantled at the possibilities of situation (sequence of the work of function). For Caesar to enter reasonably - this means to enter wisely, i.e. it is farsighted, it is foresighted. The more thorough it will be informed on the aspect "intuition of possibilities", the easier to it to enter logically produmanno.

    In a word, so that in behavior of Caesar there would be less than contradictions and fuss, it is necessary to place him in the specific psychological regime, in which it will obtain a sufficient information by intuition of the possibilities, support by intuition of time and that is very important, the absence of criticism on the aspect of the logic of relationships. I.e., the psychological support of Balzac is necessary for Caesar. Its skill to show the prospects for situation in such form that they would not frighten and would not plunge Caesar into panic, to show the possible reserve of time in order to distract it from the fuss and to create it conditions for the thorough logical analysis. Balzac knows how to find the simplest and most accessible to understanding forms explanation. He is very methodical in his explanations, he knows how to illustrate by their successful examples. It knows how to bring collocutor to the necessary logical conclusion, letting it very be glad at its own discovery.

    Block OF SUPERID*SHCH-YA pozitsiya*Suggestivnaya function * the "intuition of time"
    Caesar does not hide his problems on this aspect. Yes even as them you will hide, when and so it is clear that time with its entire exceptional activity to it never it is sufficient. And from where to it to undertake, if one takes into account the ability of Caesar to simultaneously begin many matters, each of which requires the high expenditures of time and labor.

    The attempt to be concentrated on what it should now make and how long this will engage, costs Caesar big enough stress. Therefore it prefers generally about this not to think: makes that which now wants it, and it expends on this as much time, as that requires the matter. He tries to work rapidly, it prefers not to get stuck in some stage of work in order to have time to make as much as possible, he tries not to complicate to itself work. If some vaguenesses appear, Caesar is thrown to another matter. Main thing for it - always to advance, not zastrevaya on the specific problems.

    Being fascinated by the process of work. Caesar does not frequently note its lack of promise. Therefore he sometimes fears to think about that which will be further or which will occur then. To Caesar to more easily live by present day, without a moment's hesitation about the future. Although for it it is necessary dearly to pay subsequently for today's lightness, it prefers to see in its future only that which desires for itself. Therefore it accepts information about the possible problems very unwillingly despite the fact that realizes entire its importance.

    Caesar greatly does not love to await. To him this is improbably difficult - it is too active and therefore it is too impatient. It it wants in all now and it is faster. It may happen that it to still and there is no time think or simply does not be desirable to expend the time on the reflections. Balzac assigns to it the measured off vital rate, learns it to live according to the principle "pospeshay slowly". It cools the exorbitant ardour of Caesar, calms him: "time will give answers to all questions", "time everything will arrange on the places". And by precisely this "explanation" Caesar exactly is suggested. In it suddenly appears the desire (but sometimes also curiosity) to patiently "see to the end" how all this it will end.

    Sometimes Caesar reflects about that, "correctly" he now lives or "it is incorrect". As its today's behavior they will be reflected in its future fate and that it must change now so that in the future for it everything would be formed satisfactorily.

    By themselves reflections on this theme for it are very tiresome and unhealthy. Therefore it prefers to in advance obtain finished information on this aspect. Sometimes in it appears the desire "to introduce order" in its today's life in order to prepare to itself satisfactory future. Then it becomes necessary the analysis of the consequences of each its step and each action. To Caesar it is important to know that with it it will occur after it will undertake one or other step or another. (for it is actually frequently necessary the instruction: "you will go to the right - horse you will lose...")

    By nature itself to it it is granted for this similar of dual as Balzac. No one better it will know how to predict further outcome of events depending on various circumstances. Necessary to only describe to Balzac "which was", and "which will be and how heart it will be quieted", it will already describe itself.

    From Balzac Caesar can obtain precise information about the opportuneness and expediencies of any his undertaking, obtain idea about the consequences of each his action, see the reflection of his today's behavior in the distant and near future.

    This information for Caesar is always valuable and urgent, but Balzac in this question does not have equal. Reasonable, farsighted and foresighted Caesar can be only because of the timely warnings and the forecasts of Balzac.

    Block OF SUPERID*'-YA the pozitsiya*Aktivatsionnaya funktsiya"*"Delovaya logic "
    Caesar - man of exceptional business activity and fitness for work. It is exceptionally hardy, zealous. With the readiness it starts on any work, without considering the expenditures of time and forces. If they require the circumstance of that, it starts also on the physically hard work, associated with the dangers and the difficulties.

    For Caesar, as for any representative of third kvadry it is very important to realize its creative potential, it is important to realize vostrebovannost' of its labor. Therefore Caesar is very activated, undertaking the concretely feasible matter. And the more to it is intelligible the method of its fulfillment, the greater the enthusiasm and it manifests activities.

    Caesar frequently produces the impression of man, whom everything cans. Actually, it sufficiently rapidly masters new specialties - are more precise, new crafts. Moreover, once mastered by it no longer is forgotten. Actively using his many-sided abilities and talents, Caesar easily finds possibility for the additional and easy earnings. Caesar always "and shvets, and reaper, and on dude of igrets". Whatever practical work it undertook, everything makes rapidly, easily, as if igrayuchi.

    Caesar is set in operation very actively, very process of his work draws more than preparation for it. Discussing about the fulfillment some of work, it advances possible versions in the hope, which someone from the side will select best and will undertake its realization, but, after entering into the work, it prefers no longer to reflect about the different versions: develops that, which first came to mind.

    To the criticism of its errors it relates painfully, but it is happy, when its work in terms of something differ significantly from others. It does not love to scrupulously check the results of work - it prefers so that for it this the competent and reliable partner, who will verify, would make, and it will quiet, and it will make useful observations. The need for studying its details frequently suppresses and irritates. Time is not sometimes allowed oneself thoroughly to be dismantled at the theoretical material - it prefers to examine the process of work, being simultaneously advised in each stage, which causes he has difficulties. It is interested in the essential, design observations. With the considerable attention it will listen councils apropos of the rational fulfillment of its work, but greatly it does not love, when they criticize eventual result. To it it is convenient to work employing the clearly developed and easily memory procedures.

    In private life it is sufficiently practical, cans rationally news economy. With the interest it listens information about the methods of the successful investment of money, about the possibility to make advantageous acquisition. In this question for it there is no more valuable consultant than his dual Balzac, who will always warn Caesar against unreasonable money expenditures, it will not give to it to be absorbed in by any adventurous project, it will dissuade it from the too rapid and therefore the doubtful method of enrichment. From Balzac Caesar obtains for each question the clear information: that it is necessary to make, in what sequence it is necessary this to make generally.

    On the base of this information in Caesar appears the confidence into the correctness of its actions, the sensation of rest and order in the life, understanding of the fact that its forces and energy are expended reasonably and tselenapravlenno.

    Block ID*"-ya Position * Observant Function *" sensorika Of sensations "
    Never will allow himself Caesar to appear worse than others. It always cans itself effective to present, although it relates sufficiently nagging and critically to its exterior view.

    Independent of the level of its incomes. Caesar dresses with the taste. Frequently has its own, sometimes sufficiently extravagant, the style, with which there can be it itself in the depth of soul and it is not agreeable, but it considers it necessary it to adhere to in order to have the capability to focus attention on itself. Caesar outwardly attempts differ significantly from others: he considers the brightness of his appearance an indispensable condition of his own success.

    Comfort and everyday conveniences Caesar considers an indispensable condition of normal existence. In the organization of its own way of life it is guided first of all by the requirement of optimum conveniences. To the formulation of way of life it relates without the special snobbery: cleanliness, cosiness, convenience - its basic aesthetical criteria. Of course in its house everything must be not worse than in others.

    Aesthetics for Caesar - sphere of the realization of his numerous talents and abilities. It has the sufficiently clear and specific aesthetical criteria, although many they seem questionable. Aesthetically Caesar always logichel, its artistic style is always justified. Eccentricity for Caesar is not more than the method of creative self expression.

    Skill - field, where the creative successes of Caesar are most noticeable and find the brightest and complete expression. Here it most of all is approached excellent job and precisely here its craftsmanship deservedly obtains appreciation.

    High physical activity and endurance is characteristic of Caesar. It prefers not to sosredotachivat'sya on the problems of its health. Active, saturated by impressions leisure loves.

    It is very life-loving. Its love of life with the surplus is sufficient both to it very and to its duala of Balzac. Under no circumstances Caesar does not lose natural optimism and taste for life.

    Block ID*8-YA pozitsiya*Demonstrativnaya function * the "ethics of emotions"
    The emotions of Caesar first of all subconsiously shape his manipulation ethics of relations. I.e., emotions are expressed precisely such, such as, in the opinion of Caesar, this situation requires.

    For this very reason Caesar expresses always necessary (, in addition, in his opinion) emotional relation to proceeding. If in it holiday, which means, by all it is necessary to be cheered, and it the first will try to raise the overall mood. (although it does not always consider itself as that obligated to take to itself the role of mass organizer- joker.) If some problem, which means, of joke to the side, and it the first with the characteristic of it emotional pressure will try to accelerate its permission.

    Caesar magnificently knows how to solve his problems by emotional action (as any of ethics). But since the measure for its action realizes subconsiously and is oriented to the problematic emotionalism of Balzac, emotional action of Caesar always not too serious and not not very dramatic. This of its kind the ethical game, which expresses necessary at the given moment emotional pulse.

    Caesar considers himself sufficiently strong person in order very to manage its own problems. Therefore its emotional action on the partner is not the signal of the extremality of situation (as, for example, in Hugo) - this is only form of his emotional manipulation by the partner: from one side, itself to recharge, with another - partner to swing. (A of its dual Balzac emotionally "swings" very heavily.)

    Of the emotions of Caesar (especially at the young age) is characteristic such "children's exaggeration". Frequently their expression is anticipated by the enthusiastic or frightened exclamations. Sometimes Caesar uses emotional flow in the case of the impossibility to thoroughly explain anything: "ah, well as you so can! Oy, well as you do not understand! However, well that this such!"

    At the ripe age the emotions of Caesar are more greatly subordinated to the system of his relations, and they are already more rarely the method of the independent expression of its moods. In any case, the life experience (and also successful dualization) trains Caesar to be more carefully and sderzhanneye in the expression of its emotions.

    Contact with Balzac, who knows how to extinguish superfluous (unjustified) ardency, goes to Caesar only for the benefit - its emotional infantilism, which actually prevents it from appearing majestic, disappears during its entire life.

    The restraint of emotions, brought up by Balzac, only ennobles Caesar, it gives special significance to its statements and behavior and profitably works on its authority.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  2. #2
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    51 Post(s)
    0 Thread(s)


    Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
    If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.

    ~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
    ~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.

  3. #3
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    60 Post(s)
    0 Thread(s)


    yeah, this doesn't sound much like me

    Check out my Socionics group!

  4. #4
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    60 Post(s)
    0 Thread(s)

    Default different translator (this is a work in progress

    Block EgO*1-ya позиция*Программная функция* " Strong-willed sensorika "

    For the person of this type strong-willed protection of own interests (and interests of " the command(team) "), protection of own priority at any cost is characteristic. But not with the purpose of direct and ruthless suppression, and for the maximal realization of own creative and ethical potential, for the fullest expression of own bright individuality, for realization of own ethical purposes and problems(tasks).

    Therefore a parity(ratio) of forces in system of values of Caesar — it first of all competition of personal achievements and successes. To Caesar the recognition of its(his) personal merits Important recognition of its(his) authority through comprehension of its(his) personal qualities a recognition its(his) most sensitive and careful head, the most vigorous and the most active the Recognition its(his) most true and most reliable friend its(his) Recognition the best and the most unsurpassed in own way the figure is important.

    Than it(he) was engaged, what activity for itself has chosen. Caesar always puts for itself a problem(task) to be best of the best the In itself purpose rather creditable and reputable, but on the other hand — what physical strengths it is necessary to live all life as on sports meet constantly looking back on contenders, constantly comparing own successes with another's achievements, a constant pressure(voltage) in eternal aspiration to be pulled out(escape) forward and to not concede superiority(championship).

    Caesar tries to achieve easily and quickly objects in view With enthusiasm be engaged in the chosen business, not reckoning spent for achievement of success by efforts, Caesar is capable of exclusive working capacity and on any even contradicting common sense of a victim. (for example, one of representatives of this type, the beginning(starting) singer trained itself a voice, being engaged simultaneously at three teachers of a vocal Unfortunately, the result has not justified the spent efforts.)

    Not reflecting on that risks to seem boastful, Caesar continually "reports" about the achievements, sometimes sincerely enough being surprised with that others lag behind its(his) "exemplary" rates: " As, you yet have not made this task? And I already following do(make)! " It(he) as though suggests "to be equaled" in any business on it(him). And really, why also is not present? Caesar superb is able to impose spirit of creative competition both business activity to the person most passive and indifferent to the general(common) enthusiasm. Will force podsuetitsya most bezynitsiativnogo and inactive (what extreme point of self-dispassionateness and passivity would be reached it(him) dual by Balzac if not exclusive enthusiasm and Caesar's hyperactivity)

    Caesar always condemns and blames in people passivity, absence of the initiative, deviation from the planned plans. It is impossible to tell, that Caesar obviously encouraged skill " to work as elbows " — more likely, it(he) encourages skill " to struggle, search, find and to not surrender ". Caesar does not respect with those who gives in to difficulties. It(he) always for an active vital position, for active search of decisions Sometimes methods which it(he) offers for the decision of problems, look(appear) a little bit rectilinear. Not that that it(he) suggested to go and break the closed doors (though it too is not excluded), but to defend the rights in any possible(probable) way, to achieve planned at any conditions, it is indispensable.

    It is really important to Caesar to know, what problems are solved a method of strong-willed pressure and what — are not present. Therefore, giving(allowing) advice(councils) which, probably, it(he) also has not followed, Caesar does(makes) it of reasons of reception of the information on important for itself, to "program" aspect " strong-willed sensoriki ". Where it is possible "to press", and where — it is impossible.

    In the same way in an estimation of potential contenders Caesar first of all considers(examines) ability of the person to resist to pressure rendered on it(him), and also skill to stand up for and readiness to give(allow) immediate repulse often assured(confident) of the power(force) superiority or feeling, that a situation "works" on it(him), Caesar presumes " trial attack " aside that, its(his) whose power(force) potential now interests. Absence of immediate protection sometimes directs it(him) at an erroneous idea, that the person in general on it(her) is not capable. Sometimes such hasty conclusions lead to its(his) very unpleasant situations.

    It is the extremely unpleasant to Caesar, when it(him) publicly " put on a place " — it underestimates its(his) self-estimation. Still nelepee a situation when any in general the unfamiliar person for not clear reasons on it(him) attacks. In this case Caesar feels very lost(confused). Unfortunately, it(he) is not always capable to take quickly the control over the feelings and easy and firmly to demand explanations.

    Caesar can is bright, sometimes defiantly "declare" itself. It(he) can challenge to a society, can take to itself a scandalous scenic image: for it(him) it no more, than expression of own creative individuality. Much more it(he) is disturbed with absence of interest to. Unwillingness to notice its(his) strongly pronounced abilities, unwillingness to recognize its(his) success, unwillingness to obey to its(his) leadership.

    Caesar first of all the person of action. Therefore especially painfully it(he) perceives any restriction of the activity. (a problem with which it(he) often enough collides(faces) as its(his) activity has inconsistent enough and chaotic character.) its(his) activity assumes wide scope and scale of actions.

    It is exclusively initiative, can "break" literally into an another's life, in another's attitudes(relations) because of what quite often makes impression of the impudent fellow and the impudent person. Often happens it is inconsiderate and persuasive.

    In aspiration to grasp the initiative at any cost Caesar often proves far not the best image because of what sometimes gets in an awkward situation, sometimes happens is simply pity or ridiculous. (about what God forbid to it(him) to tell.) there is nothing more painfully for Caesar, than to see, that all its(his) diligence to win (to win) authority, popularity or an arrangement, lead to opposite results. To Caesar's honour, it(he) is able to admit the fact of own mistakes(errors) and is capable to recognize publicly the fault though it is possible(probable) to it(him) is given more hard, than another.

    It would be wrong to tell, that for Caesar its(his) ambitions first of all are important. For it(him) much obidnee misunderstanding of its(his) kind intentions. Caesar is absolutely sincerely confident the right to leadership. Therefore non-recognition of its(his) priority for it(him) is deeply insulting, as it first of all non-recognition of its(his) merits, its(his) fair self-denying, creative, with full feedback of forces of work. If at Zhukov leadership — is strategic calculation where any infringement of its(his) ambitions is perceived as hostile attack. Caesar, unlike Zhukov, struggles not for self-affirmation of own ambitions, and for the right to justify the trust assigned to it(him). Easier speaking if to Zhukov the sensation of its(his) real authority is important. To Caesar important voluntary recognition and trust. It is important to Zhukov to seize power. It is important to Caesar to keep leadership. If the authority is necessary to Zhukov to head system Caesar, first of all as much as possible to realize the creative ethical potential, to democratize system headed by it(him), eticheski to improve it(her). If zhukovskaya strategy — aspiration to grasp all spheres of influence for Caesar it is important to grasp " a palm tree of superiority(championship) " in all spheres of the activity: personal advantages, in its(his) opinion, convince associates of its(his) right to leadership even more.

    If Zhukov always rigidly supervises the grasped sphere of influence Caesar not always notices, that it(he) in general has grasped any space.

    (It is necessary to note, that comparison of program functions of Zhukov and Caesar is given for the explanatory of basic distinctions in them " strong-willed sensorikakh ", and at all to specify who from them the "good" leader and who "bad" — at each of them the social function necessary for realization in a certain situation and in certain public conditions.)

    Caesar's acts first of all differ speed and aggressiveness, the immediate and all-round initiative. Caesar imperceptibly for itself fills all surrounding space. It(he) not always notices, not always estimates(appreciates) methods which it(he) uses for the prompt gain of sympathies: to it(him) the authority is more important to keep, and for this purpose it(he) is ready to fulfil the obligations taken on fairly and ethically.

    Caesar's problem also that unlike Zhukov always knowing, " as is necessary ". Caesar distinctly(clearly) knows only " as it is not necessary ". At all exclusive talents Caesar more likely the destroyer, than sozidatel. In the politician(policy,politics) it(he) the destroyer of totalitarian and authoritative systems. In art it(he) — the courageous innovator subverting settled forms existing up to it(him). It(he) can be the founder of a new direction in art which anybody except for it(him) and cannot continue. To imitate — as much as necessary, to continue — is not present. Among representatives of this type often there are the bright creative individualities, comprehensively presented persons.

    Discrepancy " strong-willed sensoriki " Caesar consists in the democratic character of its(his) autocracy. Caesar sincerely hates tyranny and despotism, it(he) from what name write " on fragments samovlastya ". And at the same time it(he) all means aspires to not concede the influence. The recognition of own defeat in this plan for it(him) is especially painful. Attempt at any cost to keep the influence quite often leads Caesar. To the desperate and inconsistent acts having for it(him) often tragical consequences.

    Block EGO* 2-nd позиция*Творческая функция* " Ethics of attitudes(relations) "

    Caesar first of all builds any ethical attitudes(relations) from positions strong-willed sensoriki. That is, as though they developed, Caesar in any case should remain the leader. Caesar is deeply convinced, as first and last word in development of attitudes(relations) should remain behind it(him). It(he) is always absolutely confident the right to supervise any ethical situation irrespective of, whether it(he) is in it(her) the main person(face) or minor.

    Despite of rather strong ethical installations, and besides, that ethics of attitudes(relations) — its(his) strong creative function, it is impossible to tell, that ethical attitudes(relations) at Caesar developed easily. To Caesar in general nothing is given easily because it(he) all and always wins. Caesar's problem that it(he) often wins that anybody and does not challenge from it(him). It(he), on the trouble, is in the habit to win that as so by the right belongs to it(him).

    It would seem, that prevents to perceive simply and naturally to Caesar the natural appeal, the charm, ease and ease in dialogue. But in that and a trouble, that Caesar needs a constant and universal recognition of these qualities. Moreover, proofs of the recognized superiority(championship), the proof of its(his) conclusive influence And in a pursuit of these proofs it(he) are necessary for it(him) and manages to lose all "regal" greatness Sometimes the impression is made, that it(he) fishs for compliments, violently and is inappropriate "pulls" on itself attention, takes a great interest in narcissism

    And in the field of ethics Caesar has not enough polupobed only having appeared, it(he) should fascinate everything, charm everything, "kindle" everything, interest all or if it is necessary, to intrigue all.

    And if there is someone whom it(he) is not interested completely not to itself(himself) to arrange, only because this person it(he) is simple for itself in any way does not consider(examine), it(he) for it(him), simply speaking, " an empty place ".

    It is no wonder, that at such ethics of behaviour Caesar manages (irrespective of scales of its(his) activity) to acquire to itself many enemies. And attitudes(relations) under the scheme(plan) the friend — the foe at it(him) too are under construction very contrastly and inconsistently: the yesterday's foe today "mercy" is accepted in number of friends because " so it is necessary ", the today's friend giving more of attention to other subject, any more(not so) the friend, and "traitor". (Caesar, perhaps, unique who in the third kvadre divides attitudes(relations) into "enemies" and — Drajzer divides "friends" on "" and "another's", and интуиты-logic on it(this) do not reflect at all)

    Just because ethics of attitudes(relations) at Caesar are formed under influence strong-willed sensoriki (more precisely, it(her) realizes), the maximalism is its(her) distinctive feature. But, needless to say, Caesar's ethics cannot and should not be consecutive: realizatsionnaya function — always manipulyativnaya, always such what is necessary to the program of intelligence. In case of Caesar strong-willed sensorika — aspect firm, program, and ethics of attitudes(relations) only make out "alignment of forces": the power(force) parity(ratio) — ethics vary varies also. To those with whom Caesar respects also whose arrangement achieves, — one attitude(relation), to those whom " in a penny does not put ", — another. In that and a problem of ethics of Caesar, a secret of the fastest acquisition by it(him) of enemies — in its(his) inconsistent ethical maximalism.

    As for a long time Caesar "jams" in a phase of enmity or friendship, depends only on a concrete situation. But certainly, Caesar will not recede, yet will not clear it(her) for itself finally, more precisely, it(he) will recede, only being convinced, that attitudes(relations) have finally collapsed and it(he) does not have chances them to correct. (To correct, in Caesar's understanding, means again to gain authority. It is unimportant, whether what exactly it(he) does(makes) — asks a pardon or kicks up a row: it no more than means "to correct" a situation in any way.)

    Etichnost Caesar, already by virtue of the manipulyativnosti, always relative, despite of strong ethical installations. That is in any certain situation Caesar quite can realize, that acts badly (moreover, it(he) always knows how it would be necessary to act(arrive)), but it(he) always has a "convincing" justification to own unethical acts. neetichnost in acts of others Caesar always notices, but far not always condemns and at all always in this occasion expresses. To Caesar's honour it is necessary to recognize, that it(he) is capable to concern with humour to another's ethical imperfections.

    Constantly struggles for expansion of sphere of the ethical influence. It is possible to consider(count) it(him) some kind of " the ethical aggressor ". But Caesar's actions in a zone of the influence are chaotic, inconsistent and frequently unethical. Ethical tactics constantly varies, "authorized representatives" vary, friends-enemies vary, the centers of strong-willed pressure and emotional influence are constantly displaced. Caesar less realizes all, that all event — it only reaction to its(his) any concrete actions. The more it(he) suetitsya, the is more heated a situation, the more it(he) loses strategic reference points in the ethical attitudes(relations). Eventually it(he) absolutely confuses, who to it(him) now whom is, and here it(he) already conducts ethical " near fight ", any narrow-gauge "shuttle" diplomacy, any primitive childlike intrigues. Similar, nobody is able so "creatively" to spoil the attitudes(relations) as it is possible to Caesar.

    In any case how its(his) acts were regarded, Caesar sincerely wants " that all was as better ". It(he) really tries as it is possible to settle is better all that all of them were happy(enough), tries to be for all good. Such position results(brings) or in inconsistent actions from its(his) party(side), or to absence of any resolute actions, that only aggravates its(his) ethical problems.

    Block SuPeReGo*3-ya позиция* Normative функция* " Intuition of opportunities "

    Program " strong-willed sensorika " the information on aspect " the intuition of opportunities " constantly demands. It is necessary for Caesar to estimate(appreciate) most precisely opportunities and abilities of each person entering into a circle of its(his) dialogue as own representation about success at it(him) is built concerning potential opportunities and successes of its(his) environment.

    It is always important to Caesar to know, at what stage of realization of the plans there are people surrounding it(him). For example, during study Caesar constantly is interested, whether it(he) lags behind others in performance of educational tasks. Moreover, it(he) always tries to hand over work as one of the first, tries to attract attention of teachers, to make about itself impression of the perspective expert.

    In any situation Caesar in advance is interested in positive opportunities. For example, even before the termination(ending) of study it(he) tries to find out all possible(probable) variants of distribution of workplaces, searches for itself for any useful business ties, is interested in opportunities of other students.

    For reception of its(his) interesting information develops high activity, finds time to have a talk with everyone about plans for the future. Thus tries to take "heart-felt" tone having to revelation, confidentially complaining on any yet not solved problems. Often before the vigorous activity collects opinions on its(his) interesting question, on many consults, but finally all does(makes) in own way.

    Tries to make impression of the person far-sighted and judicious. Very much loves, when with it(him) consult, share the plans though it(he) not always has patience to listen to the end of the interlocutor. Sometimes tries to make impression of the person, which all about all knows, (Sometimes even too hurries up to inform the information which it(he) ostensibly knows.) likes to make impression of the person which in a rate of all events, can sometimes hint, that at it(him) " all is seized ". Often, obviously exaggerating, speaks about the influence. Not away to invent or "poblefovat".

    For Caesar very important from the very beginning of dialogue to define(determine) potential of the person: sometimes Caesar estimates(appreciates) the person concerning its(his) subjective abilities, sometimes — concerning a place borrowed(occupied) by it(him) in a society, sometimes — on appearance.

    On the basis of a rough estimate of a situation and potential of characters Caesar sometimes dares to be beyond admissible ethical standards far enough. The intuition of potential opportunities prompts it(him), to whom and as it is possible to concern, who and as itself will lead who is capable to stand up for itself and who — is not present.

    Sometimes Caesar affords rather causing behaviour which at it(him) refers to " to speak the truth in eyes ". But as concept about the truth at Caesar rather relative (even because it is its(his) personal point of view), the most exact (from the psychological point of view) its(his) explanation to " searches of the truth " — it not that other as desire eticheski and intuitively "to probe" a situation. The desire to learn(find out), whether will descend(go) to it(him) from hands that it(he) now does(makes) and as will react on such " the truth in eyes ".

    Caesar does not bear(take out) uncertainty. Therefore sometimes it(he) specially accelerates crisis of a situation to make in it(her) a new alignment of forces and to understand the place in system of attitudes(relations). To understand, who is who as it(him) perceive and for whom " it(him) hold ".

    Fortunately for itself (and the duala Balzac), in conditions of uncertainty of attitudes(relations) Caesar not always becomes isolated on one partner During this period it(he) can open for itself(himself) " the second front ". Subconsciously adjusted(subconsciously set up) on vulnerable ethics of emotions of Balzac, Caesar is afraid(rather afraid) to find out those attitudes(relations) which it(he) especially values, is afraid emotionally "to press" on the partner. Therefore for redistribution of excessive emotional activity to it(him) it is necessary some kind of " a spare variant " which distracts it(him) and does(makes) less dependent from " the basic variant. "

    Tactics of " the second front " compels(forces) Caesar to dissemble, use cunning, get out of awkward situations, and it(he) of all it(this) does not love — to it(him) it inconveniently: it humiliates its(his) advantage, contradicts its(his) ethical principles, the main things from which — decency, honesty and fidelity. Besides the weak intuition of opportunities of it(this) does not allow it(him): it(he) always is afraid of exposure in lie, afraid, that will involuntarily give out itself, that will blab out, that it somehow becomes known to its(his) partner. And nevertheless, as it(he) is not always capable to find out consistently attitudes(relations) with all partners, uncertainty of a situation between them — it(he) often compels(forces) it(him) to maneuver simply does not see for itself other output(exit).

    The analysis of opportunities of a situation at Caesar often happens too superficial or too optimistical as it(he) collects the information not from the most authoritative sources and estimates(appreciates) it(her) not in the most critical image. For example, many representatives of this type unconditionally trust mass media even if those distribute absolutely improbable hearings.

    Sometimes Caesar plays a role of the person confidently looking in the future, seeing for itself and for others weight of opportunities. Often it(he) and itself thus is inspired and tries to inspire associates. However, having collided(faced) with the first real, objective obstacles, about "enthusiasm" forgets as if it(him) never and was not. Then feverish search of a possible(probable) output(exit) from inconvenient position already begins.

    The mistake(error) on aspect of " intuition of opportunities " manages to Caesar very dearly(expensively): at the best — it is separate unpleasant situations in which it(he) risks to get, in the worst — it is crash of its(his) all career. Therefore Caesar very much tries to not make anything such, that subsequently would turn back against it(him). And though it(he) never happens up to the end assured(confident) in the intuition, nevertheless it(he) aspires to develop constantly it(her) to have an opportunity correctly on it(her) to rely.

    The fullest help on this aspect Caesar all the same receives from the duala Balzac who not only is able to expect the most adverse succession of events, but also can to warn in the soft and delicate form against possible(probable) troubles. And at the same time also will prompt their way to avoid.

    Block SuPeReGo*4-ya позиция* Mobilization функция* " Logic of parities(ratio) "

    It is difficult to Caesar to be objective as it(he) is in a captivity of the ethical installations, the sympathies and antipaty.

    Its(His) acts can contradict common sense even because more often they reflect its(his) emotional attitude(relation) to an event.

    Sometimes in Caesar's behaviour the logic importance of its(his) acts, t is as though displaced. e. It(he) acts illogically, being based on any primitive logic stereotypes only because " so it is accepted to act ". And, being guided by the logic stereotypes, it(he) often acts to the detriment of the ethical principles: for example, destroys the developed good relations with the relatives only because reacts how it is accepted logically, on the general(common) concepts instead of how it(he) it feels eticheski: we shall tell, abuses for that, for what is necessary (in the standard, stereotypic understanding) to abuse, praises for that, for what it is necessary to praise.

    Sometimes it is expressed in a habit to use superficial logic (and ethical) stereotypes to operate(work) according to these slogans and to utter them in occasion of and without an occasion: " pity humiliates the person ", " are afraid — means respect ", " is jealous — means loves ", " where has laid, there and sleep ", " the woman should not show the initiative ", etc.

    Sometimes it is logically displaced intonations and accents(stresses) in speech. Sometimes it eticheski a unjustified mimicry.

    Sometimes it is the displaced or unstable interests to the perceived information. For example: listening to explanations, Caesar often distracts from the main idea, it(him) any absolutely minor moments or insignificant particulars suddenly start to interest. Imperceptibly for itself(himself), it(he) leaves aside from the basic theme or distracts questions of the minor importance. Or questions which at all have no the attitude(relation) to a discussed subject.

    One more characteristic for representatives of this type feature: ability in occasion of and without an occasion to distract from the set theme on conversations on. (the Bright example — Pushkin lyrical digressions in "Evgenii Onegine".)

    To be engaged in classification of concepts or knowledge, to result(bring) them in harmonous system — for Caesar boring and unpleasant work. It is difficult to it(him) to concentrate on the logic analysis of any phenomenon, it is difficult to concentrate for consecutive understanding of logic conclusions, it is difficult most to state something consistently: it(he) can begin an explanation directly with the middle and to continue it(him), constantly coming back to initial and intermediate stages. Thus, in Caesar's statement the some people even simple explanations are represented rather confused.

    Superficiality of representations about many phenomena it(him) is not confused — with it(him) considers(counts) it natural (" All of us studied gradually in something and somehow ") the Main thing that the discussed subject was though otdalenno, but a sign, it is impossible to make impression of full incompetence.

    It is very cautious in the statements, concerning(touching) legal or technical parties(sides) of business(affairs), does not risk to seem biassed or incompetent

    Does not like to study(investigate) the instruction and rules — to it(him) it is boring. (the Representative of this type can repeatedly burn through the electrodevice, including it(him), not having familiarized with the instruction the case of "unsuccessful" cleaning of memory of a computer after which there were erased all programs incorporated in it(him) Is known) And how its(his) personal experience was sad, all the same it is difficult to Caesar to change itself, and it(he) often is necessary not on the instruction in which seldom and a little that understands, and on success, luck and on the intuition in spite of the fact that it(she) often enough brings it(him).

    Experience of another's mistakes(errors) too not always makes upon it(him) sufficient impression Caesar can confer and consult as much as necessary, but finally will act(arrive) in own way, counter to all advice(councils) and common sense. Caesar is distinguished with a special talent constantly " to fill shishki " on the same place. Deeply to suffer, muchitsya and to ask all and everyone why it is every time occurs(happens) to it(him), and it(he) needs to get rid of what lacks in itself that these misfortunes at last have stopped the enormous patience and endurance(quotation) Are required (the qualities, inherent it(him) dualu to Balzac) to accustom Caesar to analyze experience of the last mistakes(errors), t. e. Just what Caesar, contrary to desire of associates, to do(make) resolutely refuses (both do not ask, and do not persuade!) it(he) acted and acts only as to it(him) will like, and differently it(he) cannot simply be oneself.

    For Caesar the serious problem is represented with necessity carefully to think over the acts, to behave circumspectly and judiciously. Remarks it(he) does not transfer(carry) the Requirement to illogicalities of own actions to be consecutive in actions deduces(removes) it(him) from itself(himself). For it(him) is characteristic to act cleverly and logically only until it(this) from it(him) do not demand, while with it(him) respect and with it(him) are considered. But it is necessary to bring to a focus to its(his) illogicalities as all its(his) actions at once cease to be supervised logically and get character of chaotic, panic vanity.

    Caesar's charges in an illogicality only aggravate its(his) problems. Caesar very painfully transfers(carries) any criticism to the address and as requirements to themselves at it(him) happen overestimated enough, it is difficult to it(him) to recognize at presence of all advantages such lack, as not irreproachable logic. Caesar in general would like to be the person without lacks. (and who would not like it(this)?) Therefore Caesar very much experiences, when to its(his) mental faculties state a low estimation. It is very difficult to it(him) to dare to not be the cleverest (though this best, that it(he) can make for itself(himself)).

    It is necessary to notice, that it is easier to Caesar to be consecutive and logical in the acts after it(he) has understood opportunities of a situation (sequence of work of function). For Caesar to act reasonably — it means to act reasonably, t. e. Providently, far-sighted. The osnovatelnee it(he) will be informed on aspect " intuition of opportunities ", the easier to it(him) to act logically produmanno.

    In a word, that in Caesar's acts was less contradictions and vanity, it is necessary to put it(him) in the certain psychological mode in which it(he) will receive the sufficient information on intuition of opportunities, support on intuition of time and, that is very important, absence of criticism on aspect of logic of parities(ratio). That is Balzac's psychological support is necessary for Caesar. Its(his) skill to show prospect of a situation in such form that they have not frightened Caesar and have not cast into a panic, to show a possible(probable) stock of time, to distract it(him) from vanity and to create to it(him) conditions for the detailed logic analysis. Balzac is able to find the most simple and cogitable forms an explanation. It(he) is very methodical in the explanations, is able to illustrate their successful examples. Is able to bring the interlocutor to the necessary logic conclusion, giving to it(him) to be pleased to own opening.

    Block SuPeRiD*5-ya позиция*Суггестивная функция* " Intuition of time "

    On this aspect Caesar does not hide the problems. And as them you will hide, when and so it is clear, that time at all never suffices its(his) exclusive activity to it(him). And whence to it(him) to undertake if to consider Caesar's ability simultaneously to begin set of affairs, each of which demands greater(big) expenses of time and work.

    Attempt to concentrate that it is necessary for it(him) to make now and what is the time will borrow(occupy) it, costs(stands) to Caesar of a considerable pressure(voltage). Therefore it(he) prefers to not reflect on it(this) in general: does(makes) that now would be desirable it(him), and spends for it so much time, how many that demands business. Tries to work quickly, prefers to not jam at any stage of work to have time to make as much as possible, tries to not complicate to itself work. If there are any ambiguities, Caesar is switched to an another matter. The main thing for it(him) — all time to move ahead, not jamming on private(individual) problems.

    Taking a great interest in process of work. Caesar often does not notice its(her) hopelessness. Therefore it(he) sometimes is afraid to reflect that will be further or that will occur(happen) then. It is easier to Caesar to live for today, not reflecting on the future. Though it(he) also should pay off for today's levity dearly(expensively) subsequently, it(he) prefers to see in the future only that for itself wishes. Therefore it(he) perceives the information on possible(probable) problems very reluctantly in spite of the fact that realizes its(her) all importance.

    Caesar very much does not like to wait. To it(him) it is improbably difficult — it(he) is too active and consequently is too impatient. It(he) would like all now and somewhat quicker. Happens, that it(he) also has no time to think or simply it would not be desirable to waste time on reflections. Balzac sets to it(him) measured vital rate, learns(teaches) it(him) to live by a principle " pospeshaj slowly ". Cools Caesar's unreasonable fervour, calms it(him): " Time will give answers to all questions ", " time will place all in places ". And Caesar just also is inspired by such "explanation". It(he) suddenly has a desire (and sometimes and curiosity) patiently "to look through", than all this will terminate.

    Sometimes Caesar reflects on that, is correct" it(he) now lives or it is wrong". As its(his) today's acts will be reflected in its(his) future destiny and that it(he) should change now that in the future for it(him) all has developed safely.

    In itself reflections on this theme for it(him) are very tiresome and painful(unhealthy). Therefore it(he) prefers to receive beforehand the ready information on this aspect. Sometimes it(he) has a desire "to put things in order" in the today's life to prepare to itself the safe future. Then the analysis of consequences of each step and each action becomes necessary for it(him). It is important to Caesar to know, that to it(him) will occur(happen) after it(he) will undertake this or that step. (to it(him) the instruction is really often necessary: " you will go to the right — a horse you will lose... ")

    By the nature to it(him) it is granted for this purpose such dual, as Balzac. Anybody is better than it(him) will not manage to predict(forecast) the further outcome of events depending on those or other circumstances. It was necessary to tell only to Balzac "that", and " that will be and than heart will calm down ", it(he) will already tell.

    From Balzac Caesar can receive the most exact information on timeliness and expediency of any undertaking, to receive representation about consequences of each action, to see reflection of the today's acts in the far and near future.

    Such sort of the information for Caesar always tsenen also is actual, and Balzac in this question has not equal. Reasonable, provident and far-sighted Caesar can be only owing to duly cautions and Balzac's forecasts.
    Block SuPeRiD*6-ya позиция*Активационная function "*" Business logic "

    Caesar — the person of exclusive business activity and working capacity. It is exclusively hardy, assiduous. With readiness undertakes any work, not reckoning with expenses of time and forces. If that circumstance demand, it(he) undertakes and physically heavy work interfaced(integrated) to dangers and difficulties.

    For Caesar, as well as for any representative of the third kvadry it is very important to realize the creative potential, it is important to realize a demand of the work. Therefore Caesar rather becomes more active, undertaking for concrete vypolnimoe has put. And the more to it(him) the way of its(his) performance is clear, the it is more than enthusiasm and activity it(he) shows.

    Caesar often makes impression of the person which all is able. Really, it(he) quickly enough masters new specialities — more precisely, new crafts. And, time mastered is not forgotten by it(him) any more. Actively using the versatile abilities and talents, Caesar easily finds an opportunity for additional and easy earnings. Caesar always " and shvets, and the reaper, and on dude igrets ". What practical work it(he) has undertaken, all does(makes) quickly, easily, as though igrayuchi.

    Caesar puts into operation very actively, process of work it(him) preparation for it(her) involves more, than. Arguing on performance of any work, puts forward possible(probable) variants in hope, that someone from will choose the best and will undertake its(his) realization, but, having entered into work, prefers to not reflect any more on different variants: what has occurred to the first develops.

    To criticism of the mistakes(errors) concerns painfully, but it is happy, when its(his) work something favourably differs from others. Does not like to check scrupulously results of work — prefers, that for it(him) it was made with the competent and reliable partner which will check up, both will calm, and will make useful remarks. Necessity to study it(him) often oppresses details and irritates. Sometimes does not allow itself time to understand thoroughly a theoretical material — prefers to understand during work, in passing consulting on each stage causing in it(him) of difficulty. It is interested in essential, constructive remarks. With greater(big) attention will listen to advice(councils) in occasion of rational performance of its(his) work, but very much does not love, when criticize an end result. It is convenient to it(him) to work by precisely developed and easily remembered techniques.

    In a life it is practical enough, is able to conduct a facilities(an economy) rationally. With interest listens to the information on ways of a successful investment of money, on an opportunity to make favourable purchase. In this question for it(him) there is no more valuable adviser, than it(him) dual Balzac who will always warn Caesar against unreasonable monetary expenditure, will not allow it(him) to take a great interest in any adventurous project, will dissuade it(him) from too fast and consequently doubtful way of enrichment. From Balzac Caesar receives on each question the precise information: that it is necessary to do(make), in what sequence and whether it is necessary to do(make) it in general.

    On the basis of such information Caesar has confidence of correctness of the actions, sensation of rest and the order during lives, understanding of that its(his) forces and energy are spent reasonably and purposefully.

    Block Id*7-ya позиция* Observant функция* " Sensorika sensations "

    Never Caesar worse others will dare to look(appear). Always is able to present effectively itself though to the appearance concerns captiously enough and it is critical.

    Irrespective of a level of the incomes. Caesar puts on with taste. Often has own, sometimes extravagant enough, style with which can be it(he) at heart and does not agree, but considers necessary it(him) to adhere, to have an opportunity to attract attention. Caesar and externally aspires to differ from others favourably: it(he) considers(counts) brightness of the appearance an indispensable condition of own success.

    Caesar considers(counts) comfort and household convenience an indispensable condition of normal existence. In the organization of own life is guided first of all by the requirement of optimum convenience. To registration of a life concerns without special snobbery: cleanliness, a cosiness, convenience — its(his) basic aesthetic criteria. Certainly, in its(his) house all should be not worse, than at others.

    Aesthetics for Caesar — sphere of realization of its(his) numerous talents and abilities. At it(him) precise enough and certain aesthetic criteria though they seem to much disputable. Aesthetically Caesar always logichel, its(his) art style is always justified. Extravagance for Caesar no more, than a way of creative self-expression.

    Art — area where Caesar's creative successes are most appreciable and find the brightest and full expression. Here it(he) more all aspires to excellent job and here its(his) skill deservedly receives the highest estimation.

    High physical activity and endurance is peculiar to Caesar. On problems of the state of health prefers to not concentrate. Loves the active rest sated(saturated) by impressions.

    It is very cheerful. Its(his) cheerfulness suffice both on it(him), and on it(him) duala Balzac much. Under no circumstances Caesar does not lose natural optimism and taste by a life.
    Block Id*8-ya позиция*Демонстративная функция* " Ethics of emotions "

    Caesar's emotions first of all subconsciously make out it(him) manipulyativnuyu ethics of attitudes(relations). That is emotions are expressed such what, in Caesar's opinion, the given situation demands.

    For this reason Caesar expresses always necessary (besides, in its(his) opinion) the emotional attitude(relation) to an event. If at it(him) the holiday, means, all need to have fun, and it(he) the first will try to lift the general(common) mood. (though not always considers(counts) itself obliged to incur a role of the массовика-inventor.) if any problem, means, joking aside, and it(he) the first with an emotional pressure peculiar to it(him) will try to accelerate its(her) sanction.

    Caesar superb is able to solve the problems a method of emotional influence (as any etik). But as the measure of its(his) influence is realized subconsciously and sorientirovana on problem emotsionalnost Balzac, — Caesar's emotional influence always not too serious and not so dramatic. It some kind of the ethical game expressing the emotional impulse necessary at present.

    Caesar of considers(counts) as strong enough person that most to cope with own problems. Therefore its(his) emotional influence on the partner is not a signal of extremeness of a situation (as, for example, at Gyugo) — it only the form of its(his) emotional manipulation with the partner: on the one hand, itself to recharge, with another — the partner to shake. (and it(him) dual Balzac "is emotionally shaken" very hard.)

    (especially in an early age) the nursery preuvelichennost " is peculiar Caesar's to emotions such ". Their expression is frequent is anticipated the enthusiastic or scared exclamations. Sometimes Caesar uses an emotional stream in case of impossibility something in details to explain: " Ah, well as you so can! Oh, well as you do not understand! Well this(thus) such! "

    At mature age of emotion of Caesar submit to system of its(his) attitudes(relations) more, and already are way of independent expression of its(his) moods less often. Anyway, life experience (and also successful dualizatsiya) accustoms Caesar to be more cautious and sderzhannee in expression of the emotions.

    Dialogue with Balzac, able to turn down excessive (unjustified) ardency, goes to Caesar only on advantage(benefit) — its(his) emotional infantilism which during its(his) all life really prevents to look(appear) to it(him) majesticly disappears.

    The restraint of the emotions which have been brought up by Balzac, only improves Caesar, it(she) gives the special importance to its(his) statements and acts and favourably works on its(his) authority.

    Check out my Socionics group!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts