ITT, I like wearing makeup.
ITT, I like wearing makeup.
Men should ice their tips and purse their lips.
ILE
7w8 so/sp
Very busy with work. Only kind of around.
i don't wear makeup. just occasionally(very rare) i used some eye liner and optionally some eye shadow but nothing more. some years ago someone gave me a full makeup and i didn't liked it. i absolutely hate the foundation/facial powder and the mascara. it felt like i had dirt on my face.
i guess some women may need a little bit of makeup to look better or to emphasize certain parts of her face but i don't think using makeup it's a must in order to look attractive. and if it's done wrong it can turn a good looking woman into a hideous beast. there are women who use too much of this stuff and end looking like clowns.
also not using makeup doesn't mean that it is laziness and not putting an effort. i use a lot of stuff to clean my skin or to protect it (mainly moisturizers, sun protection creams and lip balm)
i know guys that use concealers. one of the used once some sort of glitter lip gloss.
edit:
this is disturbing:
Last edited by Parasite; 03-16-2011 at 12:26 AM.
No offense, and I know you have probably heard many people say that it isn't the looks that will matter but the internal connection you can form with someone. But in all honestly, guys doesn't like girl who are always high maintenance and always have to be aware of how good they look physically. I am not saying that guys like ugly girls either, just not so uptight and anal or imagine conscious about the look. something like what Vero said, it sounds very liberating and free; like you can feel good about yourself and not worry about vanity for a moment. it helps both person's self esteem and the relationship doesn't evolve about physical beauty. In turn actuality, girls who think in a way that does not depend on make-up/ emphasis on their look, actually create a more sexier vibe than those who worries too much about their look, because no one likes conceited people deep inside.
I love that kind of indifference and spontaneity Vero described about herself. I think it's a common trait among ENXp females, and one that often spontaneously draws my attention to them. There's nothing more appealing than a girl that can charm you with her character and god given looks without all the superficial shit and contrived games that most girls use to draw attention to themselves. The lack of importance they place onto those things has an amazingly refreshing effect on me. Well, unless they are ugly or something... which can still be a completely subjective thing. Obsession with looks is a definite minus, at any rate.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
You're erring on the opposite side. Jessica wearing makeup doesn't make her more conceited than someone who doesn't. You get dressed every day I assume. You probably care how you look when you do. Whether a person pays attention to one particular aspect of their appearance or does not, does not mean they are conceited, nor does it mean on the other hand that they don't care at all about how they look.
But did I say specifically that she was conceited because she wore make up everyday? I gave an example of what a guy would rather choose, but I never said what she done was conceited, just a bigger idea of what guy's preference would lean towards if it chooses two extreme.
well I clap my hand two times and said congratulation to her genetic fortune And also you are wrong because I am not the only one and there are two opinions Also what is with the cynical response? if you think I am wrong tell me what you don't agree, but you seem weak in your logic if you pull off some non nonsensical response like that.
He started his post with "no offense" which is a phrase that specifically directs a post at a particular person acknowledging that they may take offense. If there was no recognition of the potential for offense, the phrase would not be needed. He then elaborates on his position.
I think the "no offense" disclaimer was more directed towards the potential for disagreement, and to specifically state he's not making the assumptions you are accusing him of. And the fact that he recognized the potential for offense was a thoughtful thing, which people in general should consider doing more often.
I hope this wasn't directed at me.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Look, it's just irritating, having some people on one hand saying "you don't care enough" and others saying "you care too much" when really, neither one has any business telling a person how much they should or should not focus on any aspect of themselves, whether it's appearance or something else. Let people do whatever the fuck they want. If they like getting dressed up every day and wearing makeup, awesome. If they like throwing their hair into a ponytail and heading out the door, great. Comparing them though, and telling them that EVERYONE SHOULD be like this or that is such bullshit. It's nice you have a preference in what you like in women. Guess what? That means that you CARE about appearances. You want women who seem like they don't put a lot of effort in, because it takes the focus off of that aspect. Good for you. Different people like different things, and you know, one's not more shallow than the other.
I have no problem with Jessica and what she uses before she gets out of the door. I don't know her. I can care less to say I have a problem. But, I want you to know that I am saying what MY ONE OPINION means and what I know of other guys think. I use the word No offense because some will take it that way, but does me saying that automatically mean I have a problem? earlier in the thread, you voice your opinion about cosmetic, did it mean you have a problem as well, just as if I said "no offense"?
The meaning of "no offense" you interpret is only for cynical people, I had no intention of offending Jessica, I said it because I know she might take it that way, do not think just because everyone uses it like that, I should also hold responsible to that meaning, or how you suppose to interpret it, because saying, "no offense" does not always mean what you think.
I agree. But I don't think he was telling anyone what they SHOULD or should not do. He was simply expressing a personal sentiment, and made it clear he didn't intend to offend Jessica, or anyone else.
And also, why would you be irritated by what people are saying, when you know it is not their business and (you) have no reason to care?
Last edited by Park; 09-07-2010 at 05:32 AM.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
This looks like a case where your dual is totally misinterpreting your intentions, and your conflictor is understanding you perfectly.
But nah, it's probably the gender relation that plays the main role here.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Huh? Why wouldn't it be irritating to have various people decide they were the arbiters of the "best" way for all women to present themselves on a daily basis?
An opinion or matter of taste is one thing, and who cares. People can say that all they want, and it's not irritating in the least. Neither what jessica said, nor numbers' response fit that category however, and so it was irritating. It wasn't just a personal sentiment, "nobody likes" took care of that. Hey, I know it sounds nitpicky, but language is for communication, and you can't communicate one thing and then deny that's the message that was sent. Maybe it's not the message you meant to send, but it's still there loud and clear, and it sucks that I have to break down the phrasing piece by piece to show how it came across like that, but there it is.
squark, you were only irritating once I said what I said, and not what Jessica said. this thread was evident of that, you were for cosmetic use, and had no problem t all what Jessica said, now you said it is irritating about what me and her said, you are such a hypocrite.
Well, even if that was the case, why would you care? Various people can "decide" or think whatever they want, but that doesn't mean you need to agree. And how can anyone "decide" for you in the first place? The only way that would work is if you actually weren't capable of deciding for yourself and went ahead and act in accordance to what someone else thought was the best, or whatever. You do what works for you best, and that's it.
I'd say you get stuck on the meanings you want to see. Telling someone what they meant is ridiculous. You can interpret their words in whichever way you want, but not wanting to understand their intended meaning makes you narrow-minded and offensive, not them.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Um, I never said anyone was making my choices for me. Are you purposely being dense or something? Tell me, when someone says some dumbass thing that you disagree with, does it never irritate you? It never bothers you in the least to have to listen to ignorance?
I'd say you get stuck on the meanings you want to see. Telling someone what they meant is ridiculous. You can interpret their words in whichever way you want, but not wanting to understand their intended meaning makes you narrow-minded and offensive, not them.
I wasn't telling anyone what they MEANT. I was explaining what their words and phrasing communicated to me. And obviously I'm having some sort of failure of communication myself for you to misunderstand that.
ok
here, you were giving make-up advices. which makes sense that you took my post as a sensitive attack and did not take the opposite side's opinion as sensitive as mine, which is Jessica's stand and she said this.
When Jessica voices that she thinks people are lazy and don't care about putting on make up it bothers her, you responded with this,
You responded with this.
Yes, you did say that people can look good w/o make up, but what you should have said was that physical beauty should not be judge as someone's character such as being lazy, instead you focus on continuing what you think will make the person looks best, and continuing towards your bias but now look at how you response to my post once I defended the "non-make up girls" and defending them against accusation of being lazy, with the text below...
what is worse is that you then try to sound as fair and balance as possible saying that both of us were irritating when you did not address that to ms. Jessica on her now only infamous post by saying this.
Now is that being a hypocrite? towards one side?
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
sorry, I really don't see your point. A couple women commented on having light eyelashes, and I gave a suggestion that they just dye them so they wouldn't have to spend every day putting on mascara. Never told anyone they should do it, and I don't care if they do or not.
My comments in response to you, were in response to what you said - ha, obviously. You were the one focused on what guys supposedly like, not me.
I don't understand the 2nd sentence. Are you trying to make the point that whether they're wearing makeup or not, I'm still focused on their physical appearance, rather than inner characteristics?You responded with this. Yes, you did say that people can look good w/o make up, but what you should have said was that physical beauty so not be judge as someone's character such as being lazy, instead you focus on continuing what you think will make the person looks best.
I can comment on that, if that's the point you're trying to make. I will say that appearance is important, and how you present yourself does matter. It does say something about you. I disagreed that not wearing makeup means you're lazy and don't care about your appearance at all, but your own tastes and preferences do come through in how you dress and groom yourself, including cosmetics. Calling one person's preferences superior to another is really ridiculous, as much as arguing over the best color would be ridiculous. Having a preference isn't ridiculous. Saying that everyone should have your preference is. Do you see the difference?
You're judging people by their appearances, and making estimations about their character (and degree of conceit, vanity, etc.) by how they look, and saying that a certain way of behaving regarding your appearance shows better character than another. That's the same thing that jessica was doing. It doesn't show some kind of superior character to not wear makeup or do your hair any more than it does to do it. Having people imply or suggest that it does in two extreme ways (only the inner beauty matters vs. you just don't care about yourself) are BOTH irritating. So, how'd I do that time - did anyone understand me?
Guys, aren't you tired of talking about this yet? I'm going to bed.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
NO GOD NO. here is the point. I think what Jessica said was rather ridiculous judgment on people who don't wear makeup. I then make a statement that you should not do that because it's fucked up. then I explain my opinion of what guys preferred, self conciseness > some who is not. this is an opinion just like how you explain your opinion about what looks good on a girl or not. then you came in attacking me then take my words too far.
^ that argument would have never happened if Squark wasn't all hopped up on blush.
I haven't worn makeup in months. Who/what is romero and what are you talking about?
lol. I've never worn blush ever. It is quite possible that women could become dependent on makeup however. My sister seems to be. The first thing she does in the morning when she wakes up is put on her makeup, before even her family sees her. I don't know if she's insecure about her looks without it, or if it's to her just part of getting dressed.Originally Posted by bionicgoat