In theory, i would think that LII, being the conceptual, general and principally oriented thinker of the socion, would be concise, absolute in speech. ILI is often seen as the more ''divergent'' or ''long-winded'' in that regard, not seeing the value in discerning static principalities. Te works with data rather than the connections between data, so that might be an influence. the J vs P thing seems to be present here also