Can one be typed correctly by Reinin dichotomies alone?

[Hays]

...

[Nexus]

Presently I have some confusion over my type as when I went through the Reinen dichotomies I was left with the type IEE.
I am interested in how reliable a method others find the use of the Reinen dichotomies to be in narrowing down people's types.

Reinin dichotomies - Wikisocion

quadra values usually help a lot, autocrat/democrat is usually easy to spot too...process/asking/positivist/constructivist/tactical/farsighted/yielding really give a better perspective on the psychology of each type but are not as useful for typing (though they can be)

[The Exception]

Most of the Reinin dichotomies are consistent with LII for me, but I still am skeptical of it being used as a typing method because I've seen too people for whom it doesn't work well for. I think the quadra value ones and static/dynamic are most useful.

[xerx]

The null / non-null dichotomy works consistently IME.

[Brilliand]

Karnaugh map listens to previous posters and says...

Use quadra, temperament and club separately; don't mix them!

Quadra triple:
-Merry/Serious
-Judicious/Decisive
-Aristocrat/Democrat

Temperament triple:
-Rational/Irrational
-Extratim/Introtim
-Static/Dynamic

Club triple:
-Sensing/Intuitive
-Thinking/Feeling
-Aristocrat/Democrat

EDIT: Specifically, the Karnaugh map came up with the rule that a dichotomy is useful if is ignores temperament OR ignores club OR is either Merry/Serious or Judicious/Decisive. I used the four Jungian dichotomies as the four variables for the map.

[krieger]

There is a secret fourth triple:

Negative/Postive
Process/Result
Static/Dynamic

AKA thought style.

[Marie84]

"Correct" might be a bit subjective here, but I think it can go either way. I think people can type themselves as various types using different dichotomies, and I, personally, don't find the Reinin system to be as realistically applicable, it comes across as too externally observationally focused