Gogo.
Gogo.
I'm totally dualized.
Either I suck at typing, or I've been dualized.
What do you mean by dualized here? Those who have happy relations with a dual or those who seem to embody the characteristics of their dual type in addition to their own?
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
The latter.
I doubt I am dualized.
After years of hard work and deep introspection, I would say that I am marginally self-dualized (comparing my current state with my previous states), but still fall quite short of actual complete dualization.
Quaero Veritas.
I'm not at all. Send a flock of EIEs my way, and we'll see if we can remedy that.
I know a lot of ESIs...does it mean I am dualized?
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I'd need to know what the signs of being dualized are before I make judgment.
I suppose I'm somewhat dualized, though I've never been in a romantic relationship with a dual. But I do have one good friend who's SLE, and an SEE brother, and an LSI (probably) father (still a small chance he's LII). And I feel that I am less lethargic and do-nothing than the typical IEI stereotype. I know how to spring up and be very effective when necessary. And I do some Se-type activities, like directing video, which is very much Se + Ti for me, all about being 100% in the moment because you have to respond to what's happening in the moment, make quick decisions and judgments, and tell others what needs to be done to accomplish the goal. Which is why my dad is awesome at it, and I'm doomed to mediocrity, lol.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
I'm high on duality, quick hand me some conflictors before I overdose!
I'm pretty comfortably un-dualized in the current stage of my life. Its nice to make your ego functions run rampant without worries about any of the other IE.
Most people here probably over-estimate their level of dualization.
Removed at User Request
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
:hugs: thanks aixelsyd
I mean, I don't feel my intelligence is being insulted, but it's irritating because you, Consentingadult, assert your opinion--and a poorly informed one at that--as fact. Were it not for your sheer, dogged persistence in raising it seemingly every. chance. you. get, I could happily agree to disagree.
I'm just going to go back to not reading your posts.
I'm not bad at Guitar Hero...and tend to sing when I like a theme. That's Si+Fe, I think.
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
There are a gazillion videos of you out there on YouTube. In every single one of them your behavior is such, that my POV is not merely on opinion, not even with your rationalization of being hyper of ADHD or whatever excuse you make up to avoid recognizing yourself for what you really are. I'm sorry for you.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
I'm not really, but I have an ESI friend who is extremely dualized.
What do these signs mean—, , etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.
Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).
For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.
-Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov
I keep reading this thread title as "Current posters who are disillusioned".