5-6-7, 7 on a good day, but on average 5.6-5.7.
5-6-7, 7 on a good day, but on average 5.6-5.7.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
what lol
not answerin dis
I went with 6 cause it was the first one that didn't involve money. Which I'm never going to have at any point in my life ever.
Easy Day
Yeah. The money factor kills me, big time. If I had money I would be an 8 easily.
This isn't really fair though, only a hot guy who was smart enough to finish all his med/business/law school work and still make it out every weekend can be a 7 or above. All girls have to have is looks
And they say we judge them...
[/wrist]
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
lol I'm putting myself at a 7, but I think there are other factors, like occasionally my withdrawn nature makes me unapproachable or seem like I lack confidence and I don't go out as much and make as many social connections as I should... but I'd say 7 when I'm at the prime... I probably have potential to go further but right now, I'm only a semester away from getting a degree that can produce some substantial wealth (not rich, just a solid amount) so based on that its on the border between 6/7. Physically I'm almost positive not every women is going to find me attractive, there is personal preference, but I'm tall with no major physical deformities and not fat, fairly confident, and have above average verbal/communication skills.
Anyways, I don't really like being judged and looking at myself like a narcissist, but I'm just doing this to be a good sport and go along with JimBeam's little game.
Also I think there is a transition between high school to the real world.... in high school wealth matters little, instead social status in the high school hierarchy matters, in college this kind of teenage popularity becomes less apparent as you enter full adulthood actually things like career, wealth, lifestyle, prestige matter.... that's why donald trump can get ultra hot eastern europian super-models but if there was a kid who acted like donald trump in high school, people would think he was a loser and would not get laid.... because of this gradient. Also.... I should say.... physical attractiveness is important also, but it's nothing like how its important to men when looking at women, I've always figured if you're not fat/deformed/unclean/unpresentable and you are reasonably physically fit, you probably stand a chance as being physically attractive to some women... even if you are not, well there's always the other aspects to relationships.
You're probably sp-last.Originally Posted by JWC3
I will be dirt poor all my life despite how I plan on following through with a PHD.
But yeah, I think what Megadoomer said earlier about a sort of 'tree' of attractivity really applies more than this money-manjuice scale. Also given that different people are attracted to different things/different focuses/socionics there is lots of room for variation leaving no 'objective' scale.
Jimbean, you may as well jump off a cliff at this point.
6, based on the criteria in the link. I consider myself more of a 7 though.
What do these signs mean—,
, etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason,
Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function(extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).
For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.
-Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov
I am a 5 and I consider myself on the better side of average, which means that I find it hard to believe that you folks are all higher than me. Who knows, maybe that really is the case.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat."
--Theodore Roosevelt
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover."
-- Mark Twain
"Man who stand on hill with mouth open will wait long time for roast duck to drop in."
-- Confucius
They're probably self-deluded. I'm actually extremely attractive (I have third-party confirmation, it's not just me blowing hot air) -- and I'm still just a 6 by the way it's described in the link.
What do these signs mean—
Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function
For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.
-Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov
I was being quite honest on this... so it's 8
I'm probably a solid 5 on this list. I'd be a 6 but for my quiet, introverted nature.
But like all lists of this nature, it only measures superficial attraction. These are the ways that men get women's attention, in order to move from Long Psychological Distance to Close Psychological Distance. Once Close Psychological Distance is attained, however, it's the intertype relations that will determine the success or failure of the relationship, regardless of the other factors.
And of course, measuring your self-worth by your place on this sort of list would be absurd. The most important things in life have nothing to do with whether you can attract members of the opposite sex.
Quaero Veritas.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote