Quote Originally Posted by blackburry View Post
What cracks me up about all of this is that there is a) socionics types then b) subtypes then c) ennegram type (further differienting into wings) then d) sp/sx/so typings then e) DCNH

All to explain how we are individuals. and how we relate to other individuals. it's a bit excessive, no?

I'm still here though so..


and I do not know my DCNH type.
Why is it excessive? If anything it indicates the complexity of human personality and that one system can never fully describe us. I think that's a good thing, not a bad thing. I prefer being three-dimensional than two-dimensional.