Originally Posted by
blackburry
What cracks me up about all of this is that there is a) socionics types then b) subtypes then c) ennegram type (further differienting into wings) then d) sp/sx/so typings then e) DCNH
All to explain how we are individuals. and how we relate to other individuals. it's a bit excessive, no?
I'm still here though so..
and I do not know my DCNH type.