NOOriginally Posted by discojoe
Ti, first of all has Fi role, and does not speak about fighting and methods of disarming an individual like you do...get that?
Second of all if that was Ti, then it's possible that The person would not talk about method.
The above is me using my Ti role-I just made a rule for Ti; do you see it...."if this, then that"
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Ugh, so pointless.
Look at this sentence and the absence of a RULE
If someone formidable attacks you, blind them, cut them, injure them.
Ti would say "If you're being attacked, Then..."
Te "If attacked, follow this method, blind them, cut them, injure them" hence methodical thinking, hence algorythm.
The problem here isn't me, it's your brain's rigidity and incapability to see beyond the perameters that you have created for safe thinking for you and yourself.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I really haven't tried this hard and for so long to try to explain to anyone as hard headed as you to see that you're not Ti and you don't use Ti. I have tried for a long time: what since April?
I give up!
If after this try, you still can't see and comprehend what I'm trying to say or convey to you then just....I just give up.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Discojoe is strong at both logics you only have role Ti you should listen to him tell you what different people's types are.
This is not true of logical type, just because they have strong Te (collecting information, facts, data) and Ti (making subjective rules out of the info), that doesn't mean they are smart and can see more then I can. They wish.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Discojoe is not as smart as you you should let him know what people's types are discojoe should listen to his dual.
The worse part of Dj's weak argument for being Ti is that at no point does he narrow his understanding down to a specific word.
He gives you advise about fighting but doesn't say what kind of fighting...Ti would reduce...would say specifically, fist fighting, or gun fighting, or any such specific situation; not concentrating on what situation, why, what time; to make a system or an approach to something, you must have all the information and eliminate unnecessary things, this is why Te is able to offer information when it isn't needed or necessary and where Ti only offers information when asked, when important, when needed.
I have a weak Ti and my Ti is a role, so sometimes I don't understand the simplest word, for example, I went out with this dual who said "Let's see each other occasionally."
I needed clairification, which is what Ti does, so I asked "what does the word occasionally mean; what does the word mean; what am I supposed to understand from the word occasionally."
Ti is the kind of rigidity that requires the right type of word, right term, narrow instance so that it can tell you what the rule is for that situation, this is why Ti comes up with so so many inefficient systems.
I'm over analyzing...no surprise; Ti overanalyzing; I'm over analyzing...
I need to stop now.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 08-08-2010 at 11:51 PM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote