Please talk about me in this topic to give me the attention I so crave.
Please talk about me in this topic to give me the attention I so crave.
LSE
What is there to talk about. You're a classic care giver, you provide people with information on how they can take care of their internal health with DJ's advise columns and with Te, you pick points and argue them with a storm of information; you can pick the most effective approach to doing something and you do not at all concentrate on Se and emphasize on the external qualities of an individual.
It just happends that LSE are not as dry as a cardboard and they are actually quite funny;
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
So now you're identicals with Hitta - congratulations.
Classic LSI 6w5: dedicated to compiling a flawlessly reliable systematic understanding of "how the world works," seeking to give very definite answers to the problems he sees in the world at large based on a strict theoretically framework. His "answers" aren't always classic Ti, but that's because he is objective and actually looking for truth as opposed to simply satiating his dominant function. Classic IJ temperament and utilizes the characteristically LSI approach of employing "social tactics" and personal memes to engage Beta Fe+Se-oriented social dynamic using mostly Se. Obviously seeks Fe and easily handles dramatic outbursts totally unfazed, without redoubling efforts to quell them like a Te-EJ would. Open and shut case, IMO.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
sounds Te. Yeah, try asking a Ti type if they can do the reverse; this is a poor argument of him being a Ti but using Te; there's no such thing. I can't pass my morals to submerse in Ni whenever I choose to do so, it happens subconsciously. Look at Model A, that's as clear as black and white.
He is fire and ice; once I emailed him on FB and he was cold as an arctic storm to me saying "Is there something you would like to discuss with me?" To that, I pointed out that he was being cold and he apologized; Fe valuers would appreciate my attention, as they do appreciate attention (by brother in law is one).
I thought yeah, LSE.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Maritsa you astound me on a daily basis.
Don't have enough skills right now to type people over forums, but Peter is very straight forward, to the point, helpful, and punctual. He gives no-nonsense answers and is very knowledgeable about the things he talks about.
Well. I don't know what to think about you. But you annoy me because you're being either:
Sensitively sensitive.
Insensitively sensitive.
Sensitively insensitive.
Insensitively insensitive.
I don't know how you have to do it, but learn about your own emotions dude!
You're actually a nice, sweet, normal girl. Why do you to this to yourself? These sociopathic, loser men cannot be saved by your kind and warm grace. Please move on.Ok I'm going to use my Ti role; please tell me if the contents of this thread are Te or Ti and why
Straight women. I swear.
HOW AM I UNSTABLE ESPER