Portraits by E. Filatova

[nondescript]

I was trying to find more of an exact image match that didn't exist but I really haven't seen real life people who closely resemble any of those in the images. I had to take a step back and look at the overall look and vibe. Generally I go for overall vibe but somehow I was thinking that people VI on something more specific and that is why I am bad at it. I just wasn't sure what those specifics were.

I guess that there are similiraties based on face, body etc, yes. But you shouldn't watch that, but the vibe. Like for example the SEI namegiver Dumas. He really does give a vibe of a relaxed, jolly, fat dude does he not? Or an ESE vibe that has that stereotypical "granny" vibe(hint: not every granny is an ESE-that is a FACT ). But I guess that I see these things more clearly. I can also tell whether a man is good or bad news only by vibe.

Is this what we're supposed to do @Sol ?

[Sol]

Is this what we're supposed to do Sol ?

You are supposed to analyse behavior, including nonverbal. The best way to analyse nonverbal behavior today is intuitive, - you just look and feel traits of types wich you may read in types and functions descriptions, and in intertype relations. No cosmic difficulty and no many words to decribe the method. The only things you need - practice and correct examples (or you'll need longer study on your own mistakes).
Types versions you've gotten by inuitive impressions should fit good to theory of types and intertype relations. If you typed many people and correleation with theory is generally bad (ethics are best in mathematics, most duals give you aversion, etc), then types are wrong and you need improve your abbilities. Basic theory of Socionics works not bad, so the problem is in wrong types mostly.

As types examples you may use lists in my signature.
But without clear knowing of your own type it's doubtful to type others by intuitive method good. To understand IR correctly is doubtfuly too. So it's harder for you to use this method, even having my examples. It's important for you to get clear version of your own type, preferably wich fits intertype theory with my examples of types and people in your life wich you typed yourself (give them tests, if you can).

[nondescript]

You are supposed to analyse behavior, including nonverbal. The best way to analyse nonverbal behavior today is intuitive, - you just look and feel traits of types wich you may read in types and functions descriptions, and in intertype relations. No cosmic difficulty and no many words to decribe the method. The only things you need - practice and correct examples (or you'll need longer study on your own mistakes).
Types versions you've gotten by inuitive impressions should fit good to theory of types and intertype relations. If you typed many people and correleation with theory is generally bad (ethics are best in mathematics, most duals give you aversion, etc), then types are wrong and you need improve your abbilities. Basic theory of Socionics works not bad, so the problem is in wrong types mostly.

As types examples you may use lists in my signature.
But without clear knowing of your own type it's doubtful to type others by intuitive method good. To understand IR correctly is doubtfuly too. So it's harder for you to use this method, even having my examples. It's important for you to get clear version of your own type, preferably wich fits intertype theory with my examples of types and people in your life wich you typed yourself (give them tests, if you can).

Ah yes, there was this another thing I wanted to ask you. Actually two.

When you said that I reminded you of xLE, did you mean on the first sight(like in a super ego style) or was it an overall vibe(like in ego style)? Also:
Why L? I haven't ever considered those...

[Sol]

When you said that I reminded you of xLE, did you mean on the first sight(like in a super ego style) or was it an overall vibe(like in ego style)?

Not on 1st sight, certainly. Watched several minutes of several videos. That 2 types are main versions, but I have no sure opinion still about your type. Not only S-N, impressions from other preferences are contradictory too. If to exclude types I had no impressions of Fi types, no LSE, SLI, IEI. 9 types are left among possible, where *LE just lead.

Why L? I haven't ever considered those...

Such impressions. Intuition processes are unconscious.

[nondescript]

Not on 1st sight, certainly. Watched several minutes of several videos. That 2 types are main versions, but I have no sure opinion still about your type. Not only S-N, impressions from other preferences are contradictory too. If to exclude types I had no impressions of Fi types, no LSE, SLI, IEI. 9 types are left among possible, where *LE just lead.



Such impressions. Intuition processes are unconscious.

And AGAIN CD vs HP cognitive style. WTF!

If I doubt I'm an ExI-CD vs HP!
If I doubt I'm an xEE-CD vs HP!
If I doubt I'm an xLE-CD vs HP!

...at least I know where I'm at! Tbh, I highly suspect CD because, did you see that?, I use a lot of because. I use fairly high amount of otoh too, but I wouldn't say anywhere near because. Whether it's because, darum or in my own language...it's a lot!

[Sol]

And AGAIN CD vs HP cognitive style.

Better to forget about Gulenko's fantasies based on Reinins' fantasies because those are very far from Jung and unproved, and to use only base theory like functions, dichotomies, model A partly, IR.

I highly suspect CD because, did you see that?

I don't use this hypothesis.

To understand more your type, I reccomend you try to get impressions from types among my examples, - bloggers list at least. And then to think about your quadra and other IR. I could not to identify myself without IR in past, they help a lot.

[nondescript]

Better to forget about Gulenko's fantasies based on Reinins' fantasies because those are very far from Jung and unproved, and to use only base theory like functions, dichotomies, model A partly, IR.



I don't use this hypothesis.

To understand more your type, I reccomend you try to get impressions from types among my examples, - bloggers list at least. And then to think about your quadra and other IR. I could not to identify myself without IR in past, they help a lot.

The problem is, I don't know enough people to use the IR method. So that could be a problem.