(V)al(I)date me
loljk.png
don't quote pls
(V)al(I)date me
loljk.png
don't quote pls
Last edited by wasp; 08-12-2017 at 08:39 AM.
Can't will need better pictures not glamorOriginally Posted by paranoid
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
alright, Maritsa. you're lucky I'm mildly infatuated with you.
lolalright, Maritsa. you're lucky I'm mildly infatuated with you.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Okay, new pic. Pigeonhole me please.
November, 2016.jpg
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
well, I think you don't have this "you have been categorized" look (=Ti) on you
You are not very active in that business.
I don't know how much you do it outside of this forum.
Last edited by The Reality Denialist; 03-29-2017 at 05:44 PM.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
What would you type me as? I'm curious.
I do alot of Ti but don't always show it to others.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Damn I forgot this.
I don't VI type. Nonetheless non standard LII. Only going to say if it fits. Limit reached in VI.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Well come on, you can stretch that limit.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Actually I'm leaning towards EII-Ne for my self-typing anyways now.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
hm.. possible dual? I'd look at video. I collect duals for IR test
@QuickTwist you are more IxTx than IxFx, and more>
is present. For some reason my first thought was ILI.
@QuickTwist: going by the magic of Straight Out Of My Ass™, you're not a Rational type unless you're some highly abstracted LII. Your bone structure might match, but I don't think your expression does (which is both highly subjective and subject to the context of the photo ofc.) Try Ip types.
Reason is a whore.
INTJ is the third type I am considering, but its not much of a chance based on some other input I have gotten from someone who also types people visually. Their method is more based on non-verbal communication and what is said. The seem to think pretty strongly that I am an Ji type with Se and a decent amount of intuition.@QuickTwist you are more IxTx than IxFx, and more
IDK what you mean when you say I am not a rational type. Does that mean the Judging functions (Ji, Je)? I admit I used to know more about this stuff, but I have largely forgotten most of it. I don't see myself as much of a judger, at least in my thought process. What I mean is that I tend to reevaluate things constantly in my mind.
@Both, it seems you both think of me as fairly different types when considering CFs. That seems like a pretty common conundrum in the socionics world. Is there ever a consensus at all?
I struggle with motivation, apathy and sticking to goals.
QuickTwist, I would guess Beta, possibly SLE, from your picture. Doesn't mean it's true. VI is not super-reliable.
Yeah, maybe its not reliable then, no way I am an extrovert.
Point me in the right direction. Feel free to link it in my visitor's messages.
I struggle with motivation, apathy and sticking to goals.
@QuickTwist you look soc last
It looks like we are the same
I struggle with motivation, apathy and sticking to goals.
I would prefer not to derail this thread any further.
I struggle with motivation, apathy and sticking to goals.
I love the archetypal look some of these have, very colourful.
Last edited by ooo; 06-10-2018 at 04:13 PM.
IEI, mb, mb, ESI, SLI, IEE
ooo, go by owl way. she've accepted the holly Truth of my opinion about her type. no way you are EII
I was looking at the ESEs and it struck me that #12 in ESE (bottom left) looks rather like a SLI.
I don't think i look like any of them, really, but i mostly recognize my general 'look' in this LII girl, maybe a little less 'intense' in my stare.
LII.PNG
does anyone where can i upload the filatova pics? i have some scans that i found on vk social media site (they have a few photos that i haven't seen anywhere else) and were wondering if i could like post these here but i don't know what file hosting site is generally the way to go.
Formerly known as littleblackcloud!
keep in mind that i don't think filatova was ever typing people based on vi, i believe she first did the regular typing and then took a photo when the type was certain. so it's worth to know that visual stuff like this is usually something that would enhance your typology, and not like be based fully on it.
Formerly known as littleblackcloud!
It's not necessary for Jung to mention it so we consider it a thing
And even if we did , from my reading of Jung, I don't remember that he described something called "non-verbal behavior" either , it might be something I missed though, so I will ask: where did he mention it?
If he didn't, then you're contradicting yourself by adding your own method that Jung didn't mention and considering it correct while rejecting any additions made by others even when it's based on Jung's work such as function's placement in Model A
So , you think your impression that came from one look is more correct than Filatova's typing , who interviewed them? for your information, Filatova didn't took the photos then typed them, she did the opposite : typed them then took the photos , add to this that many of them were her students , she knows some of them already , and anyone who suspected their type later, their photos were moved to the questionable folder, but the photo above has remained to this day in the correct place , and yes, whoever type with these images shouldn't use one image, he should use more, but there are similarities as wellImpressions from that guy are close to LSI. Filatova did many mistakes in types as anyone, so ~50% can to have other types. By a single photo is doubtful to check a type with high accuracy, but general situation should to exist.
in addition to this , people are very numerous, and certainly their entire faces cannot be limited to a few images, but there are clear basic features of the type, no matter how different the person looks.
Souls know their way back home
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
in order: me, ili, see, lse, sli, iee UGH
