Peter: Ne-ENTp
Lois: Alpha SF maybe?
Carter Pewterschmidt: Te-EXTj?
Chris: Ti-ENTp
Meg: Beta NF, thinking INFp
Stewie: Ti-ENTp
Brian: Fe-ESFj
Cleveland: Ne-INFj
Loretta: ESFj maybe
Quagmire: Se-ESTp?
Joe: Si-ESTj
Bonnie: Fi-INFj
Peter: Ne-ENTp
Lois: Alpha SF maybe?
Carter Pewterschmidt: Te-EXTj?
Chris: Ti-ENTp
Meg: Beta NF, thinking INFp
Stewie: Ti-ENTp
Brian: Fe-ESFj
Cleveland: Ne-INFj
Loretta: ESFj maybe
Quagmire: Se-ESTp?
Joe: Si-ESTj
Bonnie: Fi-INFj
I was also thinking ILE might be possible, but Ne-ILE, same as Peter. Wouldn't say though--stewie appears to portray somewhat more of an Se/Ni value system in this kind of show though, so I tend to lean toward EIE. He has weird moments of science and logic, especially in the beginning, almost LII-like, but portrays EIE most of the time.
This seems right.
This seems potentially true. Not sure why all the idiots in this show would be ILE... hmm, maybe McFarlane knew someone
Last edited by 717495; 08-10-2010 at 08:54 AM.
Yeah stewie is a weird and useless character on the show. He serves no purpose other than marketing as far as I'm concerned. But IMO he seems far too Ti-centered to be Fe ego, at least in the early episodes. I can see where you're coming from though with the ****** comparison.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Lois is clearly ESE-Si.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I can see Si-ESE, but I tend to go with Si-SEI because she seems more introverted/emotionally reserved, looking more for comfort and satisfaction, shows more concern for physical well-being of her family than she does the emotionality, and shares the same irrational wavelength as peter, in my opinion.
I dunno, she seems EJ to me. I could see SEI-Fe, but not IP-sub IP, she has too much energy, too much impact.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I see her having work ethic, but it doesn't really remind me a whole lot of EJ. Still though, I can see it in some daily bouts.
idk, the thing to me is, Pi-EJs usually seem more like they have tempered, controlled energy, like they are keeping something under wraps, or releasing a more insistent internal energy in sort of a parceled-out consistency, whereas Fe-IPs usually come across as having energy in spats, sort of having a natural containment and making distinct efforts to come "out" of it.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Yeah that makes sense. Sometimes with her, I'm confused if there really is an underlying EJ energy level, but I guess it makes sense that way.
Also, is there any reason why you wouldn't see Stewie as SLE? He always seems to be demanding/authoritarian about something, physically direct, and into a more sensorial-logic Ti process about how something works...and is kind of on-off with emotion and sentimentality, holds an impulsiveness of EP.
Cleveland is as SEI as they come.
Stewie is obviously Ni creative. I think the whole being emotional + ****** thing + being a bi stereotype is supposed to make him EIE.
Upon further reflection, I'm going to change my hypothesis on McFarlane from IEI to EIE. His expressions and demeanour are more open than most IEIs, I think. And like electric sheep said, he seems too tactful and socially graceful for a Thinking type (especially in that video where he's interacting with the paparazzi, for example).
EIE would also help explain why he's being mistaken for ILE; I've noticed that Benefit pairs frequently get confused, likely due to the Demonstrative function of the Benefactor being the Base function of the Beneficiary.
Quaero Veritas.