View Poll Results: Seth MacFarlane's type?

Voters
16. You may not vote on this poll
  • ILE (ENTp)

    2 12.50%
  • SEI (ISFp)

    2 12.50%
  • ESE (ESFj)

    3 18.75%
  • LII (INTj)

    2 12.50%
  • SLE (ESTp)

    0 0%
  • IEI (INFp)

    1 6.25%
  • EIE (ENFj)

    0 0%
  • LSI (ISTj)

    1 6.25%
  • SEE (ESFp)

    0 0%
  • ILI (INTp)

    2 12.50%
  • LIE (ENTj)

    1 6.25%
  • ESI (ISFj)

    0 0%
  • IEE (ENFp)

    4 25.00%
  • SLI (ISTp)

    0 0%
  • LSE (ESTj)

    0 0%
  • EII (INFj)

    0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 40 of 59

Thread: Seth MacFarlane

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Starfall View Post
    I guess I could see Fi PoLR, but Se in his ego? nah.
    He's overworked at work; too overworked to show it.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  2. #2
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    He was 2 when he started drawing; that takes some strong S

    variation of movement...take that as dynamics.

    NORMAL SLE don't always have to talk about themselves in socionics terms you know.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  3. #3
    wants to be a writer. silverchris9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,072
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ILE, imo. Fi-polr makes sense. SLE seems off-the-bat wrong, but I haven't watched any interviews. It's not impossible. Still... alpha seems to make more sense than beta. Certainly not an Fi-valuer.
    Not a rule, just a trend.

    IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.

    Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...

    I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •