Bridget Jones Diary

[Moonbeaux Rainfox]

Bridget is a total IEE, but how in the world is Darcy SLI??? Stick up his ass, proper English gent, uptight, all about the rules and appropriate behaviour, on edge and nervous/worried all the time, barrister...nothing irrational about him. The point of their relationship is that they're total opposites.

Going by some descriptions it’s honestly not absolutely impossible.

[SLI subtypes]

Description by Victor Gulenko (SLI-Te)
Outwardly seems business-oriented, somewhat severe, cold and unapproachable. A realist and skeptic, distrustful of novelty, and of those who advance ideas of declarative nature [slogans?]. Will always avoid working on useless projects due to pragmatic nature. Very dynamic and technologically effective. Can extract maximum benefits even from something that is seems useless. His products are always at the forefront and will stand up to any competition on the market. In clothing he is restrained, conservative, and prefers a sporty, technological style.

Also from Erotic attitudes:http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=Caring

This romance style is defined by focus on Si which is dynamic, irrational, and introverted, with perceptions of the present reality and physical sensations rather than inner imagery. This means that a Caring type sees attraction between two individuals as a dynamic state, which he feels is completely natural, as he also sees the physical comfort and well-being of another person as dynamic. This accounts for a Caring type's inclination to focus on the mutual attraction, or particularly the attraction felt by the other person, as connected to that person's physical well-being. The individual's own dynamic and introverted Ne perceptions lead to a sense of sleepy drifting in them, which makes him welcome impulses from another person designed to shake him out of it from time to time.

I mean yeah sure you can think of them what you want, but what other alternatives would be there? Victim? Aggressor? Or going radcal - it’s all bullshit and should be nuked? Well... the last time I checked a lot of people still used them in typing.

Re. opposites: Is Ne suggestive, like painted in these particular descriptions (like some parts in the SLI-Te description), and her providing Ne for him that much out of question (like Ne shaking Si from time to time up)? Or Te creative interacting with Fi creative? Or that the Super-ID Block is always a bit of a struggle, because it’s the opposite attitude of the Ego-Block. But well here you can go, it’s what you think, but is it really that hard to see? Like when you read Jung (but then again you can also think about Jung what you want) and him talking about how the other attitude is always kind of archaic?

Note in the side/unrelated but sth. that goes around for some time now: the more I think of it, the more I believe it’s better to understand some things inside yourself and developing that things inside of you, than thinking it’s out there and the cure for all your problems (honestly nobody has the answer to all of lifes shit). Well at least try and fail here and there and get up and try and fail better. Like to find this feeling of security and owning and understanding little by little inside you, than always ohhh... hoping that another person is the answer/the key to everything.