Watched the movie this afternoon, and I just want to announce: I want to meet someone just like Mark Darcy.
The way he was, was just PERFECT. Fe-POLR with Si. . .
Bridget Jones Diary
Watched the movie this afternoon, and I just want to announce: I want to meet someone just like Mark Darcy.
The way he was, was just PERFECT. Fe-POLR with Si. . .
Last edited by Suz; 07-19-2010 at 12:09 AM.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
He kind of reminded me of an LSI, eh?
But I can see how he'd be appealing.
I didn't like the main character very much, to be honest .... From what I remember. It's been a while.
Let's review with this person's favorite scenes.
Hmm
Ok, maybe
better clip
My favorite scenes were:
1) where Mark Darcy is coming down the stairwell and confesses his feelings to Bridget.
2) the final scene, where he trudges out after having read the diary, she thinks he's leaving because he's hurt (which is exactly what I thought too!), she runs after him in the snow in her undies, explaining how she didn't mean it, and he's like "I know, that's why i bought you a new one." (i.e. a new diary). lol!!
3) where he is helping her with the birthday dinner
I couldn't find youtube clips of them unfortunately.
but yeah, not LSI at all. SLI through and through. Even looks a bit like Jean Gabin too. Fe-POLR to the MAX. I considered ILI too but i saw signs of Si there, and he's a caregiver not a victim.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
ohOriginally Posted by Ryu
i guess 2 of the 3 scenes were in this video.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
haha, imo Bridget Jones is IEE and Mark Darcy is SLI... actually Renee Zellweger and Colin Firth could be the same types as the characters they play.
This.
For the 100th time on this forum... yes.
Quite possibly. I'm less certain about Zellweger (even though I
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Bridget is a total IEE, but how in the world is Darcy SLI??? Stick up his ass, proper English gent, uptight, all about the rules and appropriate behaviour, on edge and nervous/worried all the time, barrister...nothing irrational about him. The point of their relationship is that they're total opposites.
Going by some descriptions it’s honestly not absolutely impossible.
[SLI subtypes]
Also from Erotic attitudes:http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=CaringDescription by Victor Gulenko (SLI-Te)
Outwardly seems business-oriented, somewhat severe, cold and unapproachable. A realist and skeptic, distrustful of novelty, and of those who advance ideas of declarative nature [slogans?]. Will always avoid working on useless projects due to pragmatic nature. Very dynamic and technologically effective. Can extract maximum benefits even from something that is seems useless. His products are always at the forefront and will stand up to any competition on the market. In clothing he is restrained, conservative, and prefers a sporty, technological style.
I mean yeah sure you can think of them what you want, but what other alternatives would be there? Victim? Aggressor? Or going radcal - it’s all bullshit and should be nuked? Well... the last time I checked a lot of people still used them in typing.This romance style is defined by focus on Siwhich is dynamic, irrational, and introverted, with perceptions of the present reality and physical sensations rather than inner imagery. This means that a Caring type sees attraction between two individuals as a dynamic state, which he feels is completely natural, as he also sees the physical comfort and well-being of another person as dynamic. This accounts for a Caring type's inclination to focus on the mutual attraction, or particularly the attraction felt by the other person, as connected to that person's physical well-being. The individual's own dynamic and introverted Ne
impulses from another person designed to shake him out of it from time to time.
Re. opposites: Is Ne suggestive, like painted in these particular descriptions (like some parts in the SLI-Te description), and her providing Ne for him that much out of question (like Ne shaking Si from time to time up)? Or Te creative interacting with Fi creative? Or that the Super-ID Block is always a bit of a struggle, because it’s the opposite attitude of the Ego-Block. But well here you can go, it’s what you think, but is it really that hard to see? Like when you read Jung (but then again you can also think about Jung what you want) and him talking about how the other attitude is always kind of archaic?
Note in the side/unrelated but sth. that goes around for some time now: the more I think of it, the more I believe it’s better to understand some things inside yourself and developing that things inside of you, than thinking it’s out there and the cure for all your problems (honestly nobody has the answer to all of lifes shit). Well at least try and fail here and there and get up and try and fail better. Like to find this feeling of security and owning and understanding little by little inside you, than always ohhh... hoping that another person is the answer/the key to everything.
Last edited by Moonbeaux Rainfox; 10-08-2016 at 05:48 AM.
Haha. I'm pretty sure this is similar to the impression my narcissistic Ni-EIE (possibly Ni-LIE) female friend has of me.
I don't see Darcy as particularly tense or uptight, though. Are you suggesting LSI?
I need to see the new sequel.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
I think he's IJ, Ti base, the nerdier variety - possibly LSI, E1. You don't strike me at all similar to him going by your posts (or photos - you have that spaced out sluggish IP look in your eyes) - you're much more playful and innapropriate in your posts, while Darcy is very straitlaced. Darcy is loosely based on Mr. Darcy from Pride and Prejudice, who was LSI e1 (he was less awkward though).
The sequel is very cute, both Bridget, Darcy and their relationship are adorable. Bridget is devided between two men (the other is probably ESE) and the point is that she and Darcy supposedly have laughably bad compatibility by online matching programme and a disastrous relationship history, but still end up together.
omg this movie is so straight woman-ish.
Hmm.
You're probably right in that I probably have nothing in common with people or characters I think I have something in common with.I've never had the slightest clue about how I come across to people. Character traits have always fascinated me because I've mostly been oblivious to them, I think.
I do appear strict, inflexible and/or uptight to some, as I have been told.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
she's so/sx 7w6 haha
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
