Te and Ti
would a hacker/programmer/etc use Te or Ti more to get their job done? is it more of a this is 1) so, i see that if i do this, it produces this result, so, 2) how do i get through or do this and that.." without without actually needing to understand it... or is it more of an internal deep understanding of the program?
or would it be the programmer who uses Ti more and hacker uses Te more.. or am i so wrong.. i'm just trying to understand Te and Ti differences..
Si with Te.Originally Posted by aeon
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Ti: What does it have to do with this?
Te: Does it cut down trees?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
