Please V.I. me. Thanks.
[Hopefully I'll insert pictures correctly. And I'll be in all of the pictures so that's how you'll know it's me. In the beginning it might be a mystery (or not).]
Please V.I. me. Thanks.
[Hopefully I'll insert pictures correctly. And I'll be in all of the pictures so that's how you'll know it's me. In the beginning it might be a mystery (or not).]
Must have made a mistake. Maybe this will work better and faster:
Flickr: AlcibiadesTwo's Photostream
Flickr: AlcibiadesTwo's Photostream
Flickr: AlcibiadesTwo's Photostream
Fe PoLR? idk really though, just guessing since you've got like one facial expression for everything.
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
Thanks. Perhaps I could be SLI or ILI. Or at the very least I might have in my ego block. I'm not sure. I'd have to read more on the subject.
What's interesting and seemingly synchronous is that although Socionics and Jungian Typology/Myers-Briggs et al. differ I've been getting ISTP as a result on the Personality profile I have on my facebook profile.
I wonder if re-posting will help.
Flickr: AlcibiadesTwo's Photostream
I get devalued Si and weak ethics.
ILI maybe.
Do you think that taking most of these pictures is a huge waste of time?
Flickr: AlcibiadesTwo's Photostream
Flickr: AlcibiadesTwo's Photostream
Flickr: AlcibiadesTwo's Photostream
Are they still dead or are they working now?
All of these pictures were taken in the past; the most recent ones were taken about two weeks ago or so.
Who thinks I could be SLE?
Is that what you think you are?
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
So far the current consensus is that I'm either SLI or ILI. I'll definitely read more about those types and their respective quadras, etc. I appreciate your perspective.
I'm not sure about SLE. Yet I've considered it somewhat. Yet for the most part I don't have a clue. If I really was SLE one would think I'd be more confident and less easily intimidated and not so fearful, etc. I don't know.
Maybe ILI.
5530_1175783827834_1025229221_30558643_540625_n on Flickr - Photo Sharing!@@AMEPARAM@@http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4073/4785016167_d568dffc81_m.jpg@@AMEPARAM@@4785016167@ @AMEPARAM@@d568dffc81
lol I like this one. You look so serious and your friend looks like Napoleon.
edit: not sure why it shows up like a video
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
If he looks like Napoleon could that make him SEE or SLE?
Um, I wasn't saying that so much as a typing suggestion (I think napoleon is typed as SEE), just one of those retarded in-your-own-head things that make you lol.
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
I'm not completely sure what picture you were referring to. Was it the picture with the young guy or the old guy?
I guessed ILI before checking what others said, so that seems about right.
Quaero Veritas.
XXTj would be my guess but i really don't know
Yeah Fe polr seems obvious here. No chance of SLI, just not in the body language. So ILI it is.
Mizami: Registreer jezelf nu! <-- take the test
Last edited by Kalinoche buenanoche; 12-27-2011 at 04:23 PM.
Removed at User Request
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm w works: I think you look SLI, maybe ILI.
I vote SLI, though, for two reasons: 1 - the phrasing of your thread title reminds me of something an SLI friend of mine would have written, and 2 - your username is "lazybones"
lol Soap...
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
ILI or more distantly, LII.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
ILI, logical subtype.
LOL
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4100/...9e36f4bf_b.jpg
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I took that Mizami test and this is what I got --
Test results
ILI Your result
ILE These types might also be considered
IEI
LII
SLI These types are not very likely
IEE
LIE
SLE
EII These types are quite unlikely
SEI
LSI
EIE
SEE these types are extremely unlikely
LSE
ESI
ESE
So apparently a lot of people think I'm Gamma NT, most likely ILI. Then there are people who think that I might be a ego type, possibly SLI. And then there are the 3 or 4 other types I might be -- SLE, LII, IEI, IEE...
Regarding how I maintain and manage my living environment I'd say that I'm not too organized. I wouldn't say that I want or like things to be extremely disorganized all the time, yet at the same time I'm not that passionate about keeping things in order, and for me it would be like a necessary evil that I usually don't like to attend to. Nevertheless, in the (distant) past there have been times when I attempted to channel some of my "obsessive-compulsive" tendencies into (unnecessary) chores/cleaning, yet for the most part I've seldom been time-efficient (time management is not my forte), and some people have said that I tend to over-analyze or over-think. At home, I'm usually disorganized and random I guess... Yet at the same time I hope that I have some inherent penchant for organizing, it's just that it's not something I like to do too much on a daily basis. Even working at a library started to bother me -- when things became repetitive, mundane, boring. Perhaps I don't make adequate use of my strengths, skills, etc.
Regarding the username "lazybones", I guess it was the first thing that came to mind at the time. And I've been called that in the past, and I guess I do sometimes have a tendency to procrastinate or I don't always like to go out and the like. Then again there are other factors that influence my inertia or whatever.
Anyway, thanks for all your insights. They definitely help me reflect more on my type.
Thanks. I guess I might very well be ILI.
I forgot to add, there's an interesting quote, and although it's from a book that's influenced by Myers-Briggs (since I don't have any books on Socionics), I still find the quote fascinating. Unfortunately, in Myers-Briggs, ISTP's and INTP's are considered Introverted Thinking types.
-from Understanding Your Management Style: Beyond the Myers-Briggs Type Indicators by Robert Benfari, Ph. D. with Jean Knox; pp. 19-20 [(Chapter) 2 - The Sixteen MBTI Types (ISTP and INTP): 'The inferior function for introverted thinkers is feeling. Their judgments are black and white, a characteristic of undifferentiated feeling. "You could compare the inferior feeling of an introverted thinking type," wrote von Franz, "to the flow of lava from a volcano; it only moves five meters an hour but it devastates everything in its way. But it also has the advantages of a primitive function, for it is tremendously genuine and warm. When an introverted thinker loves, there is no calculation in it." Unfortunately, the introverted thinker hates with an equal lack of calculation.
ILI is also my impression, you give off that deeply introspective, detached Ni matched with Fe PoLR type of demeanor
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
So it's official: I must be ILI. It definitely appears to be the consensus view. Of course I could still be something else, especially if there are any ILI's that disagree with this typing; yet at the same time ILI seems to be the logical choice (The Observer, The Critic...) ILI has been one of the principal types I've considered since I started reading about Socionics.
Well I guess it could partially depend on whether I get along better with Extraverted Intuitors or Extraverted Sensors. Unfortunately I'm not too social, and I don't really have close friendships in real life. Plus I've often been prone to isolating myself (for a variety of reasons, excuses, and past experiences in life) so I don't have as much of a life-based understanding of people as I'd like to. And I guess it doesn't help that personality tests aren't always reliable, especially Myers-Briggs tests. Just because a girl tests as an ENFP in Myers-Briggs, doesn't mean she's ENFp/IEE in Socionics. For all I know she's an IEI [Ethical subtype?]. Particularly since she idolizes Marilyn Monroe and Andy Warhol (weren't they IEI's/Beta NF). For all I know I might be some Beta type. Maybe not. It's hard to say. I still don't know how compatible I am with genuine IEE's though.
Ashton, if I am some beast, which one do you think is more likely--SLI or SEI? Of course that question might be sort of rhetorical since SLI already appears to be more probable than SEI.
Isn't Ozzy Osbourne also SEI? And what about Kurt Cobain -- I've also seen him typed as SEI. Yet at the same time I'm not sure whether I agree or disagree with the consensus typing of Courtney Love=SLE. Here's a picture of Kurt and Courtney:
http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/...rtney+kurt.jpg
I like them both, yet I'm not sure if it's relevant.