Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Something to consider about Sensing

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Azeroffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    California
    TIM
    ENTj 3w4 sp/sx
    Posts
    2,200
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    3w4-5w6-9w8

  2. #2
    Executor MatthewZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    TIM
    Ne-LII
    Posts
    794
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Great video on human visual perception and demonstration on how one cannot perceive the world precisely as it is and must use cognitive function to interpret sensory information.

    Now, what does this imply about Sensing?

  3. #3
    Azeroffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    California
    TIM
    ENTj 3w4 sp/sx
    Posts
    2,200
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well I think one question that you could ask is: what does this mean as far as Se vs Si? If anything at all. Se as a particular object and Si as a contextual field. How might sensations be processed differently?

    An interesting and possibly relevant thing he had said as well: "The brain didn't evolve to see the world the way it is...The brain evolved to see the world in a way that was useful to see..."

    This might say something about Se+Ti vs Si+Te and the difference in the way the two interpret reality.
    Last edited by Azeroffs; 07-04-2010 at 04:17 AM.
    3w4-5w6-9w8

  4. #4
    jughead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NC
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    899
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    in both cases you could say then acting on sensing is a good thing in most cases, and if its not then intuition is needed.
    But I don't have much exp with sli or any si types.

  5. #5
    norph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    TIM
    NotINotNNotFNotj
    Posts
    172
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Azeroffs View Post
    An interesting and possibly relevant thing he had said as well: "The brain didn't evolve to see the world the way it is...The brain evolved to see the world in a way that was useful to see..."

    This might say something about Se+Ti vs Si+Te and the difference in the way the two interpret reality.
    What does it say, then?

  6. #6
    Azeroffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    California
    TIM
    ENTj 3w4 sp/sx
    Posts
    2,200
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by norph View Post
    What does it say, then?
    Not sure, I was just trying to inspire some thoughts, but apparently I'm failing.

    It was an interesting video nonetheless.
    3w4-5w6-9w8

  7. #7
    norph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    TIM
    NotINotNNotFNotj
    Posts
    172
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Azeroffs View Post
    It was an interesting video nonetheless.
    No, it wasn't. Visual perception is enormously dull.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •