Lol @ 4:22
Lol @ 4:22
Lol @ this guy:
Sorry. Ramsay is hilarious. "Don't look at me like a 5 year old, and do something about it!"
He looks cool at 3:19, like he's spreading his fans.
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
You think he's LSE?Originally Posted by polikujm
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
my celebrity crush - Subterranean
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
noah. SLE. cannot you tell?
Well now I don't know whether you're being sarcastic or not.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Lol @ :30
@April, I take back those things I said about Kevorkian seeming like a cool guy haha
...
Last edited by pinkcanary; 06-10-2017 at 01:50 AM.
...
Last edited by pinkcanary; 06-10-2017 at 01:49 AM.
Oh how could I have ever forgotten my biggest celebrity crush of all time
Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull
My crushes:
Adriana Lima:
Hyo Yeon:
Sofia Vergara:
Kate Beckinsale:
Roselyn Sanchez:
Nicole Kidman:
Halle Barry:
Valeria Golino:
Shannon Elizabeth:
---
My heroes:
The O'Doyle Family:
Leslie Nielsen:
Bernie Lomax:
^ lol that movie was so Alpha
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
<3 Craig Ferguson
Ashton looks like Craig Ferguson, in the eyes.
You've caught me, LokiVanguard. You've unraveled my delicately woven plot. It may seem rather queer to a straightforward young man such as yourself, but I get a thrill out of creating threads that do not offer any original content. I wait in silent breaths while observing the landscape of the forum for that golden thread that I will one day recreate. Months, perhaps years, go by until I feel the security to repost that thread, all while drunken by the wishful thinking that no mere man could unfold my elusive grand plan. Congratulations, LokiVanguard. Well played. Well. Played.
(In closing, I'm not sure why I wrote that. It may have to do with not sleeping for over two days, though.)
April why aren't u getting sleep?
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Both are very good lookin' fellas!
re: joke though! It's ALL in the eyes!
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Two words.
Sandra Bullock
KateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKa teMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKate MossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMo ssKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMoss KateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKa teMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKate MossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMo ssKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMoss KateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKa teMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKate MossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMo ssKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMoss KateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKa teMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKate MossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMo ssKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMoss KateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKa teMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKate MossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMo ssKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMoss KateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKa teMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKate MossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMo ssKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMoss KateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKa teMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKate MossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMo ssKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMoss KateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMossKateMoss
Also, Amanda Tapping.
wow. I've never seen her with black hair. (I skipped that new show of hers)
Also, Amanda Tapping.
I thought it was a misposted picture lol
Carey Mulligan is ALWAYS. RELEVANT.
EDIT
Also
Audrey Hepburn. Flaming crush on a stick, Audrey Hepburn.
I know. her face is way cute in that picture (not that she wasn't cute before)
So, Ashton, are those your crushes or heroes?
She's INFp starfall, but I guess you know already
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
50's Audrey is hot.
When I saw your pictures, I thought so too.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
:hump:
what is it with that weird icon? What information prompts you people to use it?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I absolutely adore Audrey Hepburn and her movies.
I would say ISFp makes more sense. She VIs similar to a couple ISFps I know, if that means anything to you.She's INFp starfall, but I guess you know already
(As a side note, for some reason I tend to be infatuated with ISFps).
Nope, never; read some bio/autobio and you'll see.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_McCandless"]Christopher McCandless[/ame]
The guy from the movie "into the wild".
Hero. *salutes*
A little bit of both.
You choose SEE's because they are too materialistic SE combined with Te instead of being stars and artists.
And the other two idk maybe because you see yourself in them and think you could do just as well.
Will Smith and Kanye are SEE. They are in it for the success too much and it blatantly shows
What happened to Miley Cirus?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
