Pookie, would you ever give us a VI photo?
@crazedrat
I like pleasure.
Pookie, would you ever give us a VI photo?
@crazedrat
I like pleasure.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I agree with Aixelsyd and Silverchris that Pookie is an IEI. I was going to do a statment by statement analysis as to why but it looks like Silverchris beat me to it.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Removed at User Request
I'm just stating my opinion of Pookie's type, I never said it was an indisputable fact that she's an IEI. I'm not intending to misguide anyone. Ultimately it's Pookie's decision to decide whether or not she agrees with my assessment. And there is no clear consensus that she's IEI. EII, IEE, and LSI have also been suggested. I would have said IEI regardless of what others typed her. Because in my opinion (and that's all it is) the way Pookie described herself best matches IEI. Just because Aixelsyd and Silverchris got the same impression doesn't mean I'm blindly following the crowd.
But for the record, Aixelsyd and Silverchris are far more competent at typing in my opinion than you and Maritsa are. Krig is competent at typing too as are several people on this forum. I'll admit that I'm probably not very good at typing others yet. But at least I admit that. But you know what? It's a free world and we all have the right to express our opinions (which are just opinions not the undisputed truth) about peoples' types. You have the right too.
If you think I'm mistyped that's your right. You're entitled to your opinion. I'm also entitled to mine. I'm not going to convert over to EII just because you think that's what I am. I'm going to need something more convincing than just one person's opinion.
Anyway, I'm done arguing with you. Obviously you're not going to budge with this. You think I'm closed to considering any type other than LII. Obviously that's not true. I did seriously consider the possibility of EII for awhile there. I posted a thread about it. I eventually concluded that LII was more likely than EII. I also did the same with ILE, which you thought I was prior to EII.
This will be the last time I respond to one of your posts. You're going on my ignore list.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Removed at User Request