Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I understand why that would be frustrating, but as i said in that thread, Maritsa, I'm quite sure she has you on ignore, and if that's the case she wouldn't have been able to copy what you said as no one had quoted you at that point. It's possible she just happened to say something very similar. It wasn't anything ground breaking or unusual, and that same idea, including the words "exclusion adn inclusion" made sense and could easily have been thought of by two different people independently.
Even two people of different types, and even if she's right about what she thinks the types are, two different Fi-leading types, could have come up with a similar statement, both involving the words "exclusion" and "inclusion". It doesn't even rely on them being the same type.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
The only time I've copied her words has been when quoting her. She's saying total untruths here, either lying or delusional. I have no reason or desire to imitate her. Why in the world would I?
What I say is what I think and feel.
(I wish this were obvious enough that I didn't have to say it.)
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.