hmmm reliable might not be the right word. Maybe just someone who I know will be there when I need them. I rarely if ever need favors from people, but it's just really nice to have someone there that I wont have to go track down or do the scheduling thing, trying to find out when a good time/day is.
The saddest ESFj
...
Friday Afternoon to Sunday Afternoon?Originally Posted by electric sheep
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
I'll mark my calendar
The saddest ESFj
...
In the words of suicide bombers in delivery trucks:
Nothing stops the mail.
Not a LII but for the sake of comparison: I can do a lot for my friends on the spot, when they need me, emergency calls and such, as long as they genuinely need it (i.e. it's not a whim), but I'll do my best to dodge any attempt to make me commit to something in the future, and hate anything that "hangs over me". I don't want to have my options limited by previous commitments, although to some extent it's unavoidable. I'm also very unreliable when it comes to them, because as the situation changes, I may find it worthier to choose another path. And don't even mention deadlines.
What Pinocchio says about Gamma/Alpha NTs in general sounds more like rationality/irrationality, or at least more like LSE than LIE. Either that or he's right and I'm an Alpha NT. Which I don't think I am.
Removed at User Request
You spoke of Gammas and Fi-valuing being at the root of it, and both Alpha NTs, making the implicit comparison in this context. That's hardly the only point though. Even if we assume you didn't mean both Gamma NTs, I disagree since I know more reliable LIIs alone than such irrationals. Let's say the pattern is too weak to consider it, however. Or too influence by life's experiences. Or something. Nonetheless, what you said about LIEs and discipline and reliability sounds exaggerated, especially in comparison to LSx types.
Also, you're really bad at playing black ball.
Removed at User Request
Really? So I should just withhold my own opinion, since it doesn't seem to go with Pinocchiostream? Except I couldn't care less whether you agree. FYI I happened to be replying to electric sheep when you decided to insult me for daring to disagree with your assertions about LIEs and Gammas in general, at least some of which I consider misleading.
Socionics is inconsistent. It doesn't work regardless of what perspective you view it from.
If anyone is doing this it is you. Please, you have no idea what you're talking about, just get out of this thread. It's too bad your knowledge of socionics can't compensate you for your complete lack of understanding of human nature. So yes, you are the one who is disrupting with your provocative an misguided posts. Now kindly fuck off.
The saddest ESFj
...
Removed at User Request
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote