View Poll Results: Which code do you prefer?

Voters
47. You may not vote on this poll
  • 3-letter code

    22 46.81%
  • 4-letter code

    13 27.66%
  • I don't care.

    12 25.53%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 87 of 87

Thread: 3-letter code / 4-letter code

  1. #81
    24601 ClownsandEntropy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    TIM
    LII, 5w6
    Posts
    670
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Where's the two letter option? http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...ation_elements Type LI woo!
    Warm Regards,



    Clowns & Entropy

  2. #82
    Glorious Member mu4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mind
    Posts
    8,173
    Mentioned
    760 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    three letter code is better and differentiates from MBTI better. No confusion of INTj with INTJ. Two letter codes is hard to figure out I/E which is actually really important.

  3. #83
    Olly From Wally World's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Wally World
    Posts
    822
    Mentioned
    52 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    3 letter code only because there's no doubt you're talking about socionics when you see it. 4 letter code can be confused for MBTI especially if people say it in all lowercase or caps (ex: infp or INFP). I think the four letter code is more flexible though so when needing to use 'x' for uncertainty or to group types up, it's better. Like if you are stuck between ENTj or ENTp you can say ENTx. Can't really do that with the 3 letter code.

  4. #84
    Subthigh Socionics Is A Cult's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,276
    Mentioned
    514 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    The 4 letter code is still easier for me (if I wanted to make a note of something related to a type and wish to record it accurately - where there is a chance I will go with what I wrote, it would lead to less mistakes, and it is perhaps quicker for me to comprehend). But the 3 letter code is better for the MBTI-related issues that people have mentioned.

  5. #85
    24601 ClownsandEntropy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    TIM
    LII, 5w6
    Posts
    670
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah I'm also pro-3-letters because it's obv socionics when you mention it. Also, it has a bit more of a focus on what your dominant function is and what your creative function is, which is kind of what I see is the crux of Socionics.
    Warm Regards,



    Clowns & Entropy

  6. #86

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    TIM
    INFp
    Posts
    63
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I kinda prefer the 4 letters notation. In the other one, the letters I and E have two different meanings, which is especially confusing in case of NF types. I would really love a hybrid notation that uses the 4L letters in the 3L notation, like NFE instead of IEE. This way is way more intuitive, the clubs are easily recognizable this way, and so are whole types.

    Oh and some of the types like SEE or EII sound awkward when you say them aloud.

  7. #87
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ClownsandEntropy View Post
    Where's the two letter option? http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...ation_elements Type LI woo!
    The 2 letter option I find confusing. I tend to confuse T (Ni) with thinking, I (Ne) with introversion, and E (Fe) with extraversion.

    There's also the nickname designation. Robespierre for LII, Huxley for IEE, etc. I find that confusing for beginners. It's a whole new list of things to memorize.

    I prefer using symbols or three letter codes.

    Four letter codes are too easily confused with MBTI types.
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •