View Poll Results: How to convert MBTI type to Socionics type?

Voters
32. You may not vote on this poll
  • INTJ = INTj. Straightforward. MBTI just uses a wrong order of functions.

    4 12.50%
  • INTJ = INTp. MBTI just uses a wrong definition of the j/p dichotomy.

    4 12.50%
  • INTJ = INTj or INTp. Depends on subtype!

    3 9.38%
  • INTJ = INTj or INTp or ENTj or ENTp. MBTI uses different definitions for I/E and p/j.

    6 18.75%
  • INTJ = ???. MBTI uses different definitions for all dichotomies.

    10 31.25%
  • Other opinions...?

    5 15.63%
Results 1 to 40 of 161

Thread: How should MBTI type be converted to Socionics type

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    tereg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    TIM
    EII/INFj
    Posts
    4,680
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    fwiw, I typed as an INFP MBTI before I found out about Socionics.
    INFj

    9w1 sp/sx

  2. #2
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,446
    Mentioned
    335 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    In MBTI, NT = relatively smart person whose interests are primarily intellectual/scientific.

  3. #3
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,009
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarno View Post
    BTW If I remember correctly, only 4 words per type were allowed in the type descriptions. So that's begging for confusion.

    This amateuristic table is just a myth creator, and you folks fell for it.
    Where is the information about 4 words to be found? I didn't see it in the article.

  4. #4
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,430
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiss View Post
    Where is the information about 4 words to be found? I didn't see it in the article.
    can you post me the link where the article was.

    Cause I'm certain I have read something like that. I've once studied this table in depth. But cannot remember every detail...

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •