Simple.
Alpha
EIE
IEI
Beta ST
Gamma
Delta ST
IEE
If Maritsa weren't an EII, what type would she be?
Simple.
ESI.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
every body is just going to have to have it go through their system, aren't they. It's like watching a disease spread through people. *sigh* at another maritsa thread.
the type that nobody else would say
i put isfj because i dont see any intuition from her.
What type do you think she is?Originally Posted by Ezra
It's a good question, but it probably isn't really the point, it seems a few people are pretty much just having their replacement Phaedrus.
Obviously EIE.
HERHERHER.
I am nothing like Phaedrus. He didn't know how to consider others' opinions for shit. I consider them, and mostly think they're shit.
I am INFj/EII...my goodness!!!
Redbaron is EIE; I am a little like her but not Ni oriented. My dual has Ni poLR and I make sure I don't apply pressure where it hurts.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I think Cyclops was calling Maritsa Phaedrus... more of the sense of the forum's attitude toward her than in the sense of her behavior.
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
This exchange between Cyclops and I should proove it all to anyone who knows a thing about socionics....
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...0-post769.html
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
He noticed the Se PoLR common trait between him and I and he is correct, both EII and LII have this in common with one another.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
So she's EIE? Sounds good to me.
Can I ask what makes you think that? I know you see lots of Fe from her, but would you mind expanding a little on it? How do you think/feel she is an activity relation, for example?
I hope you're not referring to mine.
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
Fe? What does Fe mean Minde?Can I ask what makes you think that? I know you see lots of Fe from her, but would you mind expanding a little on it? How do you think/feel she is an activity relation, for example?
I hope you're not referring to mine.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Minde? What does Fe mean? You can't very well accuse a person of showing Fe, if you don't know what it means...can you?Can I ask what makes you think that? I know you see lots of Fe from her, but would you mind expanding a little on it? How do you think/feel she is an activity relation, for example?
I hope you're not referring to mine.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Why don't you save yourself the trouble and ask one of the three ESE's that I have typed or EIE (Redbaron); that way you can UNDERSTAND what it is that you are trying to UNDERSTAND.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That's rather what I think, though I probably couldn't say "obviously" about it. I don't know how to explain it though, so it's another helpful contribution on my part, like putting in my "vote" for no reason.
While I'm at it, I see ESI as just not very likely. (And EII would still be something I see worthy of considering.)
I think she's good at Ne but she just would not rather use it (even though she successfully has in the past when she's been asked). Ne to her is a kind of skip-over-step, which is why I thought Ne-PoLR made sense. I see her really trying to use Se with Fe instead, and I think EIE has some merits.
Reply With Quote
