Results 1 to 40 of 50

Thread: Gulenko's IE subtype system

Threaded View

  1. #9
    JohnDo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    LII-IEI
    Posts
    636
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Let's see how intertype relations work in the EM subtype system:

    For the DCNH system Gulenko claims that "subtype duality" is the best relation:
    Dominant with Normalizing: ---
    Harmonizing with Creative: ---

    For the IE subtype system it is quite obvious how it works theoretically:
    Leader with Conscience: ---
    Motivator with Coordinator: ---
    Innovator with Decorator: ---
    Contactor with Expert: ---

    Just like in classical socionics where -base is -dual-seekig and so on...

    I definitely know that I am an Expert Analyst (Ni-INTj) and that I find Contacting Enthusiasts (Se-ESFj) most attractive of all 128 types. Evolutionary psychologically it is clear that the perfect match must be the most atractive person - evolution didn't make mistakes there I think...

    Some people don't need socionics because they just choose the most attractive partner which is naturally a good choice. But some months ago I didn't even know which type of woman I find most attractive. Socionics helps a lot to find out what kinds of humans even exist...

    Note that perfect matches have the same facial structure: Both Ni-INTj and Se-ESFj have a face which I call a "thin oval".

    Quote Originally Posted by warrior-librarian View Post
    Even identical twins don't always share the same socionics type.
    That is something I do not believe until I see it.
    Last edited by JohnDo; 04-14-2010 at 01:15 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •