That's what Gulenko says in his "Compatibility and Duality" article -- two Dominants clash all the time, two Creatives clash if they're both "on" at the same time, two Normalizers basically ignore each other, and two Harmonizers can have a stable if boring relationship.Originally Posted by Ryu
Quaero Veritas.
Hm, is that article anywhere in english?
and also, what is suggested in terms of compatibility, then, for the subtypes?
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
It was on Wikisocion, before the big crash. I did find the original Russian article, which you can translate using whatever machine translator you prefer: Ãóëåíêî Â.Â., Ìåãåäü Â.Â. "Ñîâìåñòèìîñòü è äóàëüíîñòü"
In order from most compatible to least compatible:
D+N, C+H = "subtype duality"
D+D, N+N, C+C, H+H = "subtype identity"
D>C>N>H>D = "subtype supervision"
In other words, the Irrational subtypes get along best with other Irrational subtypes, and the Rational subtypes get along best with other Rational subtypes.
Of course, that's assuming all other factors are equal, which they usually aren't. Base type compatibility is still the main determiner of deep, inner compatibility. Subtype compatibility is more about surface-level, daily-life compatibility.
Quaero Veritas.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote