VI request

[Beautiful sky]

Honestly I think you look worlds more alpha NT than gamma NT. You have that sort of 'aggressive' nerdiness (not meant to be a bad thing othat I tend to identify with Ne+Ti. In my experience, INTps tend to have an apathetic lethargy about them, something I don't really get from you.

No, they are quiet and observant. They are kind, and like being in the mix of things without making any waves.

[Lobo]

Plynex, you look very IXTp imo . I would say INTp>ISTp.

[xerx]

Plynex, before you base your judgment entirely on VI, how sure are you that you're not Alpha NT? I'm not questioning your type, but I would suggest doing some reading.

[Pa3s]

why do you think INTp is the best fit, so to speak, for you? Is it because of descriptions you might have read or some other insight?

Well, I read a lot about mbti before. I know, it's not really compareable because it's a different therory, but I already got much information about the whole Jung typing system. I read descriptions, of course, and I also found many facts that apply. But on the other hand, I also find many correct things in say, the INTj description. INTp somehow "seems" to be right, but I wouldn't say I'm 100% sure...

Honestly I think you look worlds more alpha NT than gamma NT. You have that sort of 'aggressive' nerdiness (not meant to be a bad thing othat I tend to identify with Ne+Ti. In my experience, INTps tend to have an apathetic lethargy about them, something I don't really get from you.

Don't worry, you don't offend me. It's possible... but I read about the group behaviour of Alpha and Gamma and I think Gamma would be the right thing. I'm always open for alternatives, though.

Plynex, you look very IXTp imo . I would say INTp>ISTp.

My introversion is the only thing I never really doubted. So, yeah... But I have friend who is ISTp (I think) and the difference is clearly visible between us.

Plynex, before you base your judgment entirely on VI, how sure are you that you're not Alpha NT? I'm not questioning your type, but I would suggest doing some reading.

Yeah no problem, we can discuss. I won't base my judgement just on the VI. My "decision" may looked a bit quick, but I already did some research. Okay, I have to admit it's hard for me to determine if a function is "primary" or "secondary" for me. It's getting complicated if you want to analyze it completely.