Well, that's a good point. In the context of a Socionics discussion, I'm referring to people with the "normal" range. Obviously, there are a number of factors that affect behavior, and not all of them are directly related to what Socionics type a person is. And, while, as Phaedrus points out, there are commonalities regarding observations going back thousands of years, that doesn't mean that the issues involved, the mappings between behavior and differing theoretical constructs, etc., are entirely straightforward.