It is tempting to respond to this thread and correct misinterpretations or provide additional information, but I would feel incredibly vain drawing that much attention to myself. Should anyone happen to have more than a passing interest in me and my life, there is plenty of info out there to learn all one would want to know and probably more.
Maritsa, as for your typing method based on "morphological" features (i.e. VI), I cannot comment on the methodology itself because I know nothing about it and am not interested. However, the results of using such a methodology I know all too well from years of exposure in Ukraine:
- its adherents tend to claim 100% or "95-99%" accuracy
- it tends to lead to psychological bullying by adherents of the method
- strong VI proponents tend to display many forms of intellectual dishonesty
- it leads to the creation of hierarchical socionics schools where those on the lower rungs suffer psychological oppression similar to that experienced in cults; they become dependent upon the leader/s in their judgments and even life decisions
- VI and its close relatives are the most popular tool for creating cult-like socionics groups (see
The Socionist: How to Create a [Socionics] Cult to learn how to build such a cult)
So, even if you have the best of intentions and think that you are truly helping people, I don't think VI is useful for much more than gaining psychological dominance over a small group of slavish followers who think you have a supernatural gift.