yeah you're one to talk. . .Originally Posted by Maritsa33
yeah you're one to talk. . .
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
I am the one to talk and confidently so, because I know his language, I can sense my dual a million miles away.yeah you're one to talk. . .
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
we are pointing out that you are IEI. You had your typing wrong. You couldn't have known until someone points it out to you. And to recognize your identical type means you have to be able to type them correctly. Which if you had your type wrong all along would mean you had your identical type's type wrong.
See the fallacy in your "teachings"?
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Everyone can sense their duals, even people who dont know socionics theory. If you can speak confidently about sensing your dual, why am I not allowed to? You're a hypocrite.
Except you can't sense duals through writing. You have to closely interact with them in action, in person. You may THINK you are sensing a dual, but it's a non-dual expressing values that are shared with your dual.
The reason is because different functions are expressed differently. some may come across through writing, some may not.
Also, smarter people have more evolved weaker functions, so Rick being IEE may have more developed Te than an IEE who is not as smart as he is. Our hidden agenda, after all, is Te. It is what we subconsciously pursue, especially when it comes to interests we are extremely interested in. So, no surprise that things Rick writes about exude Te. Doesn't mean he's LSE.
p.s. Maritsa, lay off of Rick. He's a happily married man.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
No, not everyone can sense their duals, only dualized duals can; otherwide the undualized duals go for easy to start relations like identical, mirror, and activity or anyone good looking.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Damn, I lost the lottery again! Will my luck ever turn around?
On a serious note though, I wish more people would do what I'm doing. It's quite apparent that Maritsa isn't going to budge on any stupid argument she makes, so why not just have fun with it?
Ask my mom...Ni primary love to gamble? all Gamma love to gamble...they love risk! I am from the wrong quadra for that sorry.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...j-artists.html
Who owes me some RESPECT; find out what you mean to me, RESPECT...oooooh yeah!!!!
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I stand corrected. . .DUALIZED duals. I still stand by everything else I said. Bringing us back to the POINT of my reply to that post of yours, you still can't assert that Rick is your dual, simply based on his written works. (it wasn't even him chatting with you, which would be more of an interaction).
(p.s. but since you bring us back to the topic of me, did you even care to find out whether my dual and I had dualized before presuming the nature of my attraction to this SLI in question? rhetorical question. . .no you didn't. Also, did you even bother to find out the state of my relationship with SLI in question? no you didn't. It is not easy to start--it actually hasn't started yet, or ever. I am not in a relationship with this guy. I worked closely with him, in person, for a while, and discovered duality. This is how i discovered socionics.)
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
IEI's are BETA not gamma. You are Ni primary from the BETA quadra.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Honey, you have no idea what you're talking about.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
run out of things to say, maritsa babes? If i have no idea what i'm talking about, then substantiate yourself.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
JESUS CHRIST YOU GUYS
SET MARITSA ON YOUR IGNORE LIST
HOLY FUCK HOW HAVE YOU NOT YET DONE THIS
Yeah, but it's no fun to watch it go on forever and ever, knowing that Maritsa doesn't listen to arguments.
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
Lol.
I thought you type Clint Eastwood as ESTp. He's like the most squinty eyed guy there is, and he too has walked down some streets in his time.
I haven't read most she's said on this thread yet ... however I completely agree with everything WorkaholicsAnon has said.
you're DAMN RIGHT he has
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
No, she's as EII as it gets.
judging by the ATTENTION WHORE quality of this thread....and the mixed up LOGICALLY INCOHERENT typings...and the DEEPLY FLAWED LOGIC in general she can be only one type.
SEE.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
Sometimes I get to the point of needing to debunk ridiculousness and set people straight. Feels good!
snap!you're DAMN RIGHT he hasI thought you type Clint Eastwood as ESTp. He's like the most squinty eyed guy there is, and he too has walked down some streets in his time.
OMG I busted out laughing when I read this!
Last edited by Suz; 02-20-2010 at 01:03 PM.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
I think Maritsa is fighting for what she thinks is true, not attention-whoring... and the flawed logic comes from trying to spread the word about something that she accepted from an authority and doesn't know the reasoning behind, and yet feels duty-bound to inform us of. I've fallen victim to the same thing... you just have to learn not to try to convince anyone of something that you can't actually convince them of (sounds almost tautological when I put it like that... oh well, close enough).
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
yes...that is the ostensible rationale. the overall blush from the thread strikes me as attention whoring, not having read every single word since it would put my mind to sleep.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
Thanks dual!!
That's what I said too!! I realized she is using a lot of Se in her whole agenda since she got here.
She's also obsessed with how awesome SEEs are!
I totally agree she's SEE.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Well I dont think it's necessarily attention whoring that makes her SEE. She came to this board with all this flair and attitude that she was going to "change the world" so to speak. She is commanding, forceful, manipulative in her interactions in order to achieve her ends. Sounds awfully Se to me. Then again, she might be Se valuing and therefore just one of the betas, but she doesn't come across like the IEIs here do. I think what we're seeing is an SEE trying to morph herself into what she thinks is an EII (this is after all how she's been able to whine and get people to do stuff for her, and excuse her poor performance in school).
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Praise Lord, if she's SEE, I'll have to seriously rethink my self-typing.
What type do you want to be, son ?
Today, I think I want to be INTj.
Here today, gone tomorrow.
Are you available for confessions?
Yes!
Well, it's been quite a few years since my last confession.
I have to confess, when I see contradictions, I must chase after them, dig down until the truth is revealed. I can't help myself. I want to stop posting in this thread, but, I just can't. It's self-indulgent and sinful. I should just move on.
Last edited by cinq; 02-20-2010 at 02:29 PM.
You can rearrange the capital letters of Rick DeLong's name to form Dick LeRong, or Dick ReLong, or even Lick ReDong.
Why chase, you two are in love ? Tell me, where do you see those contradictions, and who is their maker for I have a soft spot for them.
You should be on countdown?
In short, it's a primarily words game with some numbers. Suprisingly adictive, a cult following in a way here...
*edited for rude word*
try make as big a word as you can from the letters in 30 seconds.
(oh, normally one doesn't get these words that's produced, just kinda funny in the out-takes of a "high-brow" show)
On the money!
fwiw an all, i'm sort of considering IEI for this maritsa...for now...dunno for sure yet.
Watch the video again
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...j-artists.html
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Who the fuck is Maritsa.
what the fuck is ESTj
The saddest ESFj
...
what the fuck is morphology
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is
Posting Permissions
