stop retyping people you don't like.
stop retyping people you don't like.
The saddest ESFj
...
Stop typing people at all. You're just not good at socionics. When will this ever sink in? What do you have to show for this supposed magical typing talent of yours apart from your pride? Time to cut your losses and move on.
You have that phone number to Bionicgoat yet ? One can die in sleep.
yep, fail.
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
Why is he not in the Maritsa bin? He has the same "I'm right, you're wrong, because I said so!" attitude along the complete lack of evidence.
Hello, my name is Bee. Pleased to meet you .
Well, I mean, you have to admit, Pinochio uses tight logic but imo misapplies it to real life situations, maritsa asserts truths as true from empirical observation where I question the logical underpinnings of said obervation. I'd be more likely to believe pinocchio for the sole reason that if his observations fit the logic, the conclusion follows. But I'm skeptical of both, and if I'm really honest, I'm skeptical of a lot of you dudes. Then again, I'm not out to prove anything and I only on occasion care.
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
Removed at User Request
Where are these piles of evidence? All I have ever seen is theoretical speculation with both feet planted.
Removed at User Request
The saddest ESFj
...
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
Wot 'e said, aye.
Removed at User Request
/cult
Hello, my name is Bee. Pleased to meet you .
You know, I think he actually believes in his typing's and that it may not, necessarily, be for the sheer purpose of retaliation that he retypes people (even though I stated so a while back)
He probably does believe that he is right but I don't agree with his approach to Socionics, and the IE definitions, as do a lot of people it seems.
But yah, it's annoying when someone is trying to enforce their ideals of systematic correctness on others
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
Removed at User Request
I care not what he types me as, indeed he types me as IEE. I'm not sure how others are bothered either, as it stands I can find him somewhat entertaining, I think he's a lot wittier than many others who post here, much of the people that post here, it's almost like they may as well be the same account (or like somavision, different accounts, same person) - same difference really.
I'm curious - which full-type descriptions do you use as reference? If you can share this, perhaps it would go along way to understanding your perspective. Perhaps you have a source that is not accessible yet here in the West? I know you referred to me as a 'Benchmark INTp' in the other socionics forum, part of your assessment was based on something I wrote matched the type description. So, I know personally, I'm interested in knowing your source.
Removed at User Request
PLS TO RAGEQUIT AGAIN NOW
kthxbai
Hello, my name is Bee. Pleased to meet you .
BTW, How to type someone?
I used to read profiles and try to find matches, but this doesn't work. A better way to type somebody is trying to FULLY understand what functions really are and then you can assess which functions are valued/strong in a person.
Pinocchio and Maritsa5465999957 are as popular as Saddam Hussein!
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Removed at User Request
I was expecting something like that show "Hey Arnold!" I am disappoint, son.
SEE-Fi 9w8 sx/sp
First time on the forum in months, and I've just gotta say
This is still going on? Really?
ILE-Ti
6w7 sx/sp (low level of confidence)
This place is frozen in time, I swear.
Yes pinocchio, the only thing an SEI doesn't do is disagree with you. You're a genius, it's just that people don't realize it yet!! You need to argue more and maybe they will see the light.
The saddest ESFj
...
There's no other way this can't been taken as arrogant/offensive, but I still find it funny...and cruel. You remind me of one of my closest friends.
For what it's worth, I agree with you here. I find the functional descriptions only truly make sense once your conception of a type is complete. For example, when I first started in socionics, I was (and still am) on the quieter side, and based on this would not have associated myself with Fe seeking. Based on functional description, Fe comes across as emotional expression (which it partly is) but there's more to it than that which is not quite captured in the description.
Slight deviation: In terms of dichotomies/grouping, which I also sometimes find to aid me, the erotic attitudes seems remarkable accurate (a very insightful classification), as well as quadra though not to as large an extent.
LII?
Removed at User Request
+10000. I think that this is one of the main problems of this forum. And not only do people mistype others this way, but it can also lead to mistyping yourself!
I just don't understand why everyone is so flustered by them! They seem to have their own view of socionics that is different from most of us, so I'm not really sure what it means if they try to correct your self-typing...Pinocchio and Maritsa5465999957 are as popular as Saddam Hussein!
Removed at User Request
maybe
So all your friends are smarter than you and fools like me cannot join your cluband btw, it is one reason I didn't decide to accept your friendship request so far
...and really beautiful!You're a fine guy,
so, I am a logical extrovert?...have interest in everybody, but I can't get over your haste and lack in understanding others
I'm just a ballastMy "friends" area means something, I do this on every socializing network, I don't keep ballast.
No problem. But I won't ask you for a date until you accept me as a friendI hope you won't take this as offence or arrogance, but accepting anyone without discrimination sounds too "profane".
IMO, in a modern society, people behave according to rules, which covers the real traits of the people we interact to. When a person uses his/her functions, then you can spot their real traits.Typing imo should involve keeping in mind the whole image of a type. Read all the available descriptions and draw the similarities, keep what makes sense and what should be connected to it. One has to visualize this as a human, not some whatever business or supposed mechanism of the functions. Functions are good to explain, debate and understand the system, not to type. Sometimes someone is simply similar to all the people you typed say ILI but you can't tell exactly what, just parts of language, gestures, reaction in specific circumstances and so on. This can't be put on functions.
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.