hey pinocchio

[electric sheep]

stop retyping people you don't like.

[krieger]

Stop typing people at all. You're just not good at socionics. When will this ever sink in? What do you have to show for this supposed magical typing talent of yours apart from your pride? Time to cut your losses and move on.

[Timeless]

[Absurd]

You have that phone number to Bionicgoat yet ? One can die in sleep.

[Mediator Kam]

yep, fail.

[Khola aka Bee]

Why is he not in the Maritsa bin? He has the same "I'm right, you're wrong, because I said so!" attitude along the complete lack of evidence.

[munenori2]

Well, I mean, you have to admit, Pinochio uses tight logic but imo misapplies it to real life situations, maritsa asserts truths as true from empirical observation where I question the logical underpinnings of said obervation. I'd be more likely to believe pinocchio for the sole reason that if his observations fit the logic, the conclusion follows. But I'm skeptical of both, and if I'm really honest, I'm skeptical of a lot of you dudes. Then again, I'm not out to prove anything and I only on occasion care.

[Brilliand]

Why is he not in the Maritsa bin? He has the same "I'm right, you're wrong, because I said so!" attitude along the complete lack of evidence.

Ah, but he uses theoretical garble. That makes him interesting.

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[Gilly]

Where are these piles of evidence? All I have ever seen is theoretical speculation with both feet planted.

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[electric sheep]

[electric sheep]

Kiss me guys. The only thing which you affect is the quality of Gilly's forum, not me. I could not care more than he does .

That's sort of the point of this thread. You are bringing this whole forum down.

[Marie84]

You know, I think he actually believes in his typing's and that it may not, necessarily, be for the sheer purpose of retaliation that he retypes people (even though I stated so a while back)
He probably does believe that he is right but I don't agree with his approach to Socionics, and the IE definitions, as do a lot of people it seems.

But yah, it's annoying when someone is trying to enforce their ideals of systematic correctness on others

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[Creepy-Cyclops]

I care not what he types me as, indeed he types me as IEE. I'm not sure how others are bothered either, as it stands I can find him somewhat entertaining, I think he's a lot wittier than many others who post here, much of the people that post here, it's almost like they may as well be the same account (or like somavision, different accounts, same person) - same difference really.

[somavision]

I care not what he types me as, indeed he types me as IEE. I'm not sure how others are bothered either, as it stands I can find him somewhat entertaining, I think he's a lot wittier than many others who post here, much of the people that post here, it's almost like they may as well be the same account (or like somavision, different accounts, same person) - same difference really.

Some of the Penetrators more recent posts are cut and pasted from different users, so in that case you could say that he is an amalgamation of forum users.

[The Penetrator]

Some of the Penetrators more recent posts are cut and pasted from different users, so in that case you could say that he is an amalgamation of forum users.

Did you copy and paste that or did you just write it all? If second one, are you waiting on a bus that's not turning up?

[BlackCat]

I was expecting something like that show "Hey Arnold!" I am disappoint, son.

[Creepy-cinq]

I'm usually basing my typings on full-type description, the ones which evoke the whole image of a type and my observations in real life which extended them. Basically I have sets of what a type does/says and doesn't do/say, when someone does the "unlikely" things too often and the "likely" ones too rarely it's definitely a problem and I begin collecting data to clarify this - and then to prove to others.

I'm curious - which full-type descriptions do you use as reference? If you can share this, perhaps it would go along way to understanding your perspective. Perhaps you have a source that is not accessible yet here in the West? I know you referred to me as a 'Benchmark INTp' in the other socionics forum, part of your assessment was based on something I wrote matched the type description. So, I know personally, I'm interested in knowing your source.

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[Khola aka Bee]

PLS TO RAGEQUIT AGAIN NOW


kthxbai

[Creepy-cinq]

Hmmm interesting.

The differences between what I said there and what you say here - supposedly to support this theory of yours: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...same-type.html are:
- I said just This also contradicts your hypothesis on my absolute resoluteness. Assuming that you're that "Nik", I was referring to your self-description, the only references to you in my posts were: "if you ask me" and "you know like those guys in UFC". Where is your evidence that I type you as ILI independently of that description? If that was not yours but copied from somewhere else it's about that what I'm talking about.
- my reference to the descriptions was addressing this specific sentence:

I'm curious why you didn't contact me on that forum if you had questions, you had to come here and first say that I'm resolute and bring no evidence? Anyway, your answer was on the same website, I assume you live in the West and can connect to it, right?

Psychotypes.com:

On socioniko.net this type is named "The Critic":

Pinocchio, you've read way too much in my post. I'm being genuine when I ask which descriptions and which methodology you are using. I've been on 6-10 different socionic-type websites myself, reading and analyzing descriptions and interpretations. I'm curious to know why you are interpreting things differently - i.e. do you use information from other site I've not explored? I'm trying to understand the root cause of the constant misunderstandings and mistypes. There are times your perceptions are accurate, however, there are many times (like in your reply above) you've misread intentions, making connection where there are none to make, then making these connections true foundations or evidence.

By the way, I am the same Nik, and what I wrote about me is true. Your reply to post is straightforward - I asked for an opinion, and you posted - "Benchmark INTp, if you ask me!" was your conclusion, and you went on to emphasize a point in particular. Your following posts in the same thread - you continued to share an exchange under the assumption I was an INTp. It's clear you accepted that I was INTp.

To continue discussing with you, first confirm me that you're that user by PM. Quickly.

I don't jump at someone's command, Pinnochio. Honestly, this is the most bizarre request. I have a life outside this forum - in fact, I spent the last 3 days traveling 1500 Km and focused on a family matter. I don't have time to respond Quickly. In any case, I don't need to PM you to confirm I am the same user. You either accept it or you don't. I seriously doubt a PM would make a difference.