Originally Posted by
hitta
INTjs are more relativist. INTps are more absolutionist.
Yes, in a sense.
Originally Posted by
hitta
An INTj would be the one that would question whether 2 + 2=4 or not, not INTps.
Yes, at least sometimes. As I think I mention in that thread, SG questioned the objective truth of that statement when I used it as an example of an universally valid and true statement at his forum some year(s) ago.
Originally Posted by
hitta
INTjs love debates.
And so do INTps.
Originally Posted by
hitta
I actually think that SG might be INTp.
Please read my comments in that thread. I can assure you that SG is not an INTp.
Originally Posted by
hitta
That or SG has no idea what an INTp is.
He knows how to spot an INTp, but his INTp profiles are not among the best, and he has some slight misconceptions about the true nature of an INTp's thinking process and attitudes.
The ILI profile at
http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?t...gical_Introtim gives us a much more correct picture of what an INTp is really like. If hope you agree with me on that. (In case you don't it is
you who have those two types confused ...
)