Niffweed appreication thread

[Blaze]

The problem with some people in this thread is that they don't know when they have it so good. It's one thing for someone to pick faults with you, but it's quite another to gang up on someone who does so, with added venom and hypocrisy to boot.

who are you referring to subt?

i hope it's not me, since i don't even know the first thing about niffweed. the only thing i know is what i mention.

[Socionics Is A Cult]

who are you referring to subt?

i hope it's not me, since i don't even know the first thing about niffweed. the only thing i know is what i mention.

Not you to the same extent as others, but I am surprised that the whole thread seems to have passed you by. You are only culpable in that you apparently found FDG's comment funny, but what he said was probably merely a harmless 'joke'.

[Blaze]

Is a SLE typing really a complete mystery to you?

whoa....peace brother...i'm not picking on the guy.....just kinda pointing out his crypticism. but, it sounds like you have an idea...whatcha trying to say?

[Blaze]

Not you to the same extent as others, but I am surprised that the whole thread seems to have passed you by. You are only culpable in that you apparently found FDG's comment funny, but what he said was probably merely a harmless 'joke'.

hmmmm. well my intention is not to be part of a gang. when i mention his interaction with me, it's kinda like pointing out what is the big deal? like, i wasn't offended by niffweed, more amused. get it?

[Socionics Is A Cult]

hmmmm. well my intention is not to be part of a gang. when i mention his interaction with me, it's kinda like pointing out what is the big deal? like, i wasn't offended by niffweed, more amused. get it?

Yes, I think so...you seem sincere, which is the important thing.

[Blaze]

Not really.

i'm sorry you don't see it how i see it. i will say that i wasn't thinking about the thread as a whole. i don't have anything against niffweed.

[Blaze]

Yes, I think so...you seem sincere, which is the important thing.

thanks...i'll think more about the whole thread next time.

[FDG]

Not you to the same extent as others, but I am surprised that the whole thread seems to have passed you by. You are only culpable in that you apparently found FDG's comment funny, but what he said was probably merely a harmless 'joke'.

He was an asshole to me many, many times. I don't give a shit about ganging up on people, I'm just stating my opinion of him, which was probably already well-known.

[Creepy-Cyclops]

Another issue with the guy is that he has temper tantrums and is rude, yet when other people behave that way he uses it as a reason to ban them or question their types.

I also remember him taking issue with consentingadult talking about him, yet at same time niffweed talks about other people in a personal fashion.

When someone is rude or obnoxious to another then it's not uncommon to respond in kind. He's said some stuff about Joy for instance so it's not unsuprising if discojoe could respond as he has here, but then I live in the real world.

[Socionics Is A Cult]

He was an asshole to me many, many times. I don't give a shit about ganging up on people, I'm just stating my opinion of him, which was probably already well-known.

then why state your opinion at all?

[Socionics Is A Cult]

Another issue with the guy is that he has temper tantrums and is rude, yet when other people behave that way he uses it as a reason to ban them or question their types.

I also remember him taking issue with consentingadult talking about him, yet at same time niffweed talks about other people in a personal fashion.

When someone is rude or obnoxious to another then it's not uncommon to respond in kind. He's said some stuff about Joy for instance so it's not unsuprising if discojoe could respond as he has here, but then I live in the real world.

But why don't people act appropriately, rather than act how niffweed supposedly acts? If a self-acclaimed 'healthy' person immitates an 'unhealthy' person, in what sense is the 'healthy' person healthy?

At least niffweed beats you all at his own game, while you all lose at yours.

[Blaze]

.....the law of karma applies.

and so it shall apply to those who apply it.

'nuff said?

[FDG]

then why state your opinion at all?

To express my feeling of disgust towards him. There is no rational reason.

[Socionics Is A Cult]

To express my feeling of disgust towards him. There is no rational reason.

I suppose you have no rational reason for not sending niffweed a PM instead of expressing your opinions here either? Unless perhaps you wanted your widely-known opinions to be even more widely-known?

[FDG]

I suppose you have no rational reason for not sending niffweed a PM instead of expressing your opinions here either? Unless perhaps you wanted your widely-known opinions to be even more widely-known?

This is a topic about Niffweed's appreciation, and I am expressing myself against any form of appreciation towards him. You're nitpicking now, you know exactly well what I'm doing. You might disagree with me, of course.

[xerx]

He's a fundamentally mean-spirited and unscrupulous dick and I disagree vehemently with some of his socionics as well as his mis-characterization of me, but he's also done a lot for the community, writes high-quality information and I generally like him.

[Socionics Is A Cult]

This is a topic about Niffweed's appreciation, and I am expressing myself against any form of appreciation towards him. You're nitpicking now, you know exactly well what I'm doing. You might disagree with me, of course.

So not only have your comments not been appreciative, you said that "I hope he'll die soon" while claiming that you are not ganging up on him. You could merely have said why you did not appreciate niffweed rather than voice what vile things you hope will happen to him.

[Socionics Is A Cult]

Now that's nitpicking.

[Socionics Is A Cult]

"Such is life, that whatever is proposed, it is much easier to find reasons for rejecting than embracing."

That is so not true...and I can't think why.

[717495]

It's not really much of an honor. I don't think niffweed will feel any sort of honor, seeing that he reads this. So I must persist to draw something meaningful this evening:

[FDG]

So not only have your comments not been appreciative, you said that "I hope he'll die soon" while claiming that you are not ganging up on him. You could merely have said why you did not appreciate niffweed rather than voice what vile things you hope will happen to him.

I could, but I didn't want to

And you seriously want to know why niffweed might then call you an ESxp?

I don't want to know why. I know why. But it's an idiotic reason.

[Sammy]

i'd say nifweed needs an esfp to whip him into shape. and i mean that in the nicest possible way

[Bardia]

YouTube- Broadcast Yourself.

lol I can only imagine how that friendship would go... or not go.

[Blaze]

i'd say nifweed needs an esfp to whip him into shape. and i mean that in the nicest possible way

i think you are on to something sammy. for sure!!

[Nexus]

You misspelled appreciation! That is pretty embarrassing...

[07490]

You misspelled appreciation! That is pretty embarrassing...

Mistakes happen, don't sweat it.

[Creepy-Cyclops]

But why don't people act appropriately, rather than act how niffweed supposedly acts? If a self-acclaimed 'healthy' person immitates an 'unhealthy' person, in what sense is the 'healthy' person healthy?

Well, you're defining what's an appropriate response here, apparently. Although I can see what you are saying, I think, it doesn't mean that others will - or rather - others will agree with you. For instance, it could be said that you are turning the other cheek, others may take the attitude of an eye for an eye. Now, it can also be said that it's unhealthy not to respond, take for example, someone calling another an asshole, he can be the better man as maybe you seem to say, and not respond, or he can be the better man AND respond - because, to not to, could mean that s/he is allowing bullying to occur, also, they could respond for a million other reasons, maybe even because it's necessary to teach the guy a lesson - if he can't learn how to deal with people on the internet, maybe it will help him to prepare how to deal with people in the real world where it will matter more. Of course everything i've said could equally be applied in the real world also.

So maybe a healthy person should respond, maybe they shouldn't - I suppose it depends on the person, the circumstances, and some other thing as to whether responding is the healthy option.

My last post still stands also.

At least niffweed beats you all at his own game, while you all lose at yours.

What games that? I didn't realise I was playing a game, i've merely stated some factual information on the guy, i've also stated that I think he's a looser and a coward - I think I supplied my reasons for stating that, if I didn't they're probably easy to work out.

Besides, don't you think this is spending too much on this arsehole? Keep in mind that I do think he's an arsehole, due to how he conducts himself, but not least because he's called me it more than a few times in situations where I can't respond and apparently no provocation - I might not necessarily start something, but what's wrong with finishing it if someone else starts looking to rain down a bunch of nonesense upon you - and I have to say others, of which I do think it's worth standing up for others also, which you may or may not agree with, but ..... I also showed some compassion too in my previous posts, hoping he'd "improve", so it's not all bad you see

I can't speak for anyone else, but I hope i've answered you're question/point(s)/post sufficiently, if not, I will try not to cry, but the tears, who knows when they will come

I suppose you have no rational reason for not sending niffweed a PM instead of expressing your opinions here either? Unless perhaps you wanted your widely-known opinions to be even more widely-known?

And what would be the point of that? He just posts private conversations in public anyway.

-------------------------------------

I thought i'd also add, that IRL, I would just pretty much avoid people like that, but it's not always possible on the internet, like a small community, so as I said earlier, I do see your point to an extent about not responding as he does, but then, I think i've been OK, rational enough, maybe the arsehole response (sort of like a fire with fire thing - I think it and i've gave plenty of reasons, however he's called me it with no apparent reasons, he's just, I dunno, miserable).

[discojoe]

You misspelled appreciation! That is pretty embarrassing...

Typos are not the same as misspellings.

[pluie]

no. sweat it.