Oh, and I don't get disgusted at people or at things, except when people puke and that's pretty much a natural human reaction; the feeling of disgust is not synonymous with EII
Oh, and I don't get disgusted at people or at things, except when people puke and that's pretty much a natural human reaction; the feeling of disgust is not synonymous with EII
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm getting smarter. Just wanted to share something.
Originally Posted by Absurd
What sorts of things are you learning?
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
Things that are going to let me stay competitive and roll over opposition.
What sorts of things are you learning?
Oh oh oh oh, I forgot to say....I don't empathize with people.
Why? LOL I shall explain my greatest work LATER.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I want Minde to be respected for whatever she wants. My self image isn't made on this forum, it will be made in my science, it is made in my relationships and it is had with my clients.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I know how to do things effortlessly. I just say "oh, thanks," flirt with winks back at the person and not say and be aggressive like I am, but that isn't me. I am serious, tough and extremely hard shelled.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
And that must be why nobody likes or respects you.
Nobody is not an accurate statement. You people think that what I write here must be the real me. I assure you that that's not entirely correct. I tend to be a person who doesn't blow smoke up people's rear ends. I say it as I mean it and I don't care how that makes me look to you because approval from you and anyone isn't what I'm looking for. I have approval from all the right places.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
OK, Mt. Dew.
So if it works that way for you, it must work that way for everybody. Just because somebody may seem a certain way over the internet does not mean that they are that way irl. So you pretty much just said that it's possible for you to be wrong about your typings, because, well, you only know/type people based on a few sentences they type out on the forum here. But I can assure you, just because people act a certain way over the internet, does not necessarily mean they will act that way irl!
Admit it, Maritsa! Sometimes you doubt your type confirmations!It's ok, I don't think anybody really likes admitting they are wrong, but it takes a strong person to take that leap and admit when they are wrong.
No.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
One of these days I should try to join a new site and get people convinced that I'm a fat emo high-school dropout.
Convince? You're pretty convincing already.
Your current forum persona, that is.
I'm posting here.
Lolz. I do understand where Maritsa is coming from here... I had to realize that your personality can come across very easily, despite not being in-person.
More importantly, I understand her not needing approval of anyone here... I rarely try to be liked by others any more, and am confident in my own vision and self-image... but I still try to be open-minded enough, and be polite in expressing my opinion, admitting I'm wrong, etc.
Fuck off my quadra boy. This is Sparta.
Why don't you jack off Sparta yourself?
Hit me.Why don't you jack off Sparta yourself?
You're over 21. Dealer wins.
And in English?
"I think it's horrible and wrong that we [humans] can wipe an entire species off the earth." LSE morality.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Sorry Mountain Dew, didn't mean it.
You're forgiven, Absurd. No worries, you're a good man.
It really hurts my feelings that MountainDew doesn't want
to be my quadra mate.
Why is that?
Just being objective in my typing. I don't mean to 'supervise' you or hurt your feelings, I just feel you come across more ESI than EII. That doesn't mean we can't be friends though!
So many ESIs in delta quadra. What am I going to do now, Mountain Dew?Just being objective in my typing. I don't mean to 'supervise' you or hurt your feelings, I just feel you come across more ESI than EII. That doesn't mean we can't be friends though!
I only think Hydrangea, kassie, and Maritsa are ESI, not EII. Of which kassie finally came around and said Gamma fits better, anyway. For you? Keep talking with the real EIIs: Minde, Agarina, poli, Ryene, Lobo, etc.
Hehe, okay.
I was teasingJust being objective in my typing. I don't mean to 'supervise' you or hurt your feelings, I just feel you come across more ESI than EII. That doesn't mean we can't be friends though!lol
I knew that...I was teasing
Mountain Dew is whatever type this guy is.
I can see LSI.
Pure Ti humour. Lots of weak but valued Fe, strong stage presence (creative Se) takes pleasure in irony (that could be mobilzing Ni!) I think he is a cool and funny LSI!
Someone please shoot me now! *Groans*
I think Parkster posted that vid first if my memory serves me right which means he is LSI as well or Mountain Dew is SLI.
I'm goddamn depressed.... so anyone I've told in the past to cheer up and all that happy shit.... well, feel free to get me back.
No, it's not going to work. I'm fucking depressed. (That is, unless Robin Williams comes over or some shit.)......
Hey, Agee, try Xanax.
Reply With Quote
