I see. Well with that, I've now been typed as every introvert D:
What about my writing would have you believe I'm not Fi/Te?Originally Posted by xkj220
I see. Well with that, I've now been typed as every introvert D:
What about my writing would have you believe I'm not Fi/Te?
Last edited by Galen; 11-18-2009 at 12:26 AM.
You seem focused on the internal logical coherency of arguments. However, you could be EII-Ne, which has a flair of ENTp. Have you tried taking a test?
I've taken several tests multiple times over the course of approximately a year, and generally come up with EII. In what way does EII have a flair of ENTp?
Alright, I've done some thinking, and is my case for me not valuing Ti:
I sat in on a couple of logic classes the past couple weeks here at school. I found these classes to be trivial and unhelpful. Part of that may just be due to the fact that I didn't understand the terminology, so I'll give them that. But the entire class is laid out where sentences are dumbed down to variables devoid of meaning or intrinsic definition other than true/false. I feel that without knowing what exactly these variables mean at first, the task of organizing them seems pointless. This reaction seems to be more of Te favoring as opposed to Ti, although I could be wrong.
Last edited by Galen; 12-11-2009 at 04:08 PM.
Are you enjoying this attention we're giving you, Arctures?
I am still responding, aren't I?
I guess so.. why is it that you are unable to analyze this theory for yourself, think for yourself, and come up with your self-typing yourself?
Talk to the Russians, Arctures.
Because people tell me I'm wrong with I do it by myself.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote