After some intermittent discussions about the subject (me) with Ashton and the gang, we have come to the conclusion that I am Fi-ENFp. Sound reasonable at all? Comments, queries, concerns, criticisms?
After some intermittent discussions about the subject (me) with Ashton and the gang, we have come to the conclusion that I am Fi-ENFp. Sound reasonable at all? Comments, queries, concerns, criticisms?
Last edited by Galen; 12-10-2009 at 07:28 PM.
Try INFp.
Last edited by krieger; 11-15-2009 at 02:08 PM.
I think we're pretty sure that I'm not beta, or at least that's how my intertype relations seem to work.
When you say it with that avatar, I cannot believe you.
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
LOL
Sick kid: Is my daddy going to be alright?
Doctor: Your daddy is very sick, champ.
Sick kid: Is he going to die?
Doctor: We're doing all we can...but I'm not Jesus Christ. I've come to accept that now.
[Doctor getting paged]
Doctor: I gotta get this. [pause] Sonofabitch. It's my boss. I gotta go.
Sick kid: They work you too hard, sir. They should pay you a hero's wage!
Doctor: You're a good kid.
Sick kid: And you're a great doctor.
[Doctor gets up and they salute each other.]
Doctor: Don't take drugs.
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
yeah it's basically the best show ever made
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
Is ISFp an option?
Try to identify your dual, supervisor and conflictor. These are the easiest to identify relations.
If you're using Ashton's typings, I wouldn't really trust intertypes, to be honest.
Anyway, from Stickam, you don't strike me as EP or Ne base. You tend to sit very still and not look around all that much, but you're still reasonably loose; I'd say this points to INp. That you tend to be a Stickam regular (or so I assume) means you probably get on with the crowd there well, and that group is predominantly Alphas and Betas. Early guess therefore is INFp/IEI therefor.
EDIT
Another option is some sort of IJ type. I also wouldn't rule out Se base, but that's just because I don't know many and don't have an internal log of their energy or how they move. Also, VI isn't useful as a final verdict, necessarily, but it's a good place to start guessing from.
ENFp-Fi is possible, but why not ENTj? What made you change your mind? (Or are you the same person who thought they were ENTj)
You've never struck me as an ENFp from your posts, I could be wrong of course.
I'm also not sure what type you strike me as, just that "ENFp" doesn't jump out at me, usually I (think) I can spot them.
Maybe you could explain a bit about yourself and why you think you are ENFp (or other possible types).
You really think you're an Fi-ENFp? I have quite a different impression of them than you give off, probably wouldn't consider it any time soon.
that isn't the craziest self-typing i've seen. i would entertain it if you could give some decent reasoning.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I think you are INTp, not ENFp. I don't know where you get ENFp from actually.
You VI as INTp, you behave/act like an INTp, your attitude and outlook is that of an INTp.
He doesn't really value Fe at all though, and doesn't respond warmly to my Fe like alphas/betas do.Early guess therefore is INFp/IEI therefor.
1. General consensus on socionix
2. Love for Delta STs (not as much love for Gamma SFs)
3. Decidedly not of the judging variety (debatable?)
It's really down to ENFp and INFj
Also it seems like the only reason people say I VI as INTp is because of my hair. Perhaps it's also that my eyes are in a perpetual state of shadow on stickam, due to poor lighting arrangements. I also feel like my physical attitude on stickam changes a bit, since I know that I'm being perpetually watched by others.
My general impression (based on your forum activity and seeing you once on stickam) is along the lines of EII.
How do you feel about Se and EP temperament?
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Uh, the 'stickam crowd' is made up of people from all quadras. I think you're analyzing incorrectly there.
You're not making any sense, Akra.
Even if you are Delta, the stickam crowd is mostly Alpha, not Beta. So why would you be so opposed to it? And there are a few Fi-valuers there that you should share some common ground with, if that were the case.
So you either dislike the people for non-socionics reasons, or are you a person that's oversensitive and doesn't mesh well in groups. Nothing wrong with that, but that explanation is a lot more accurate then what you just said.
Well a lot of the idea is that the way one acts is directly indicative of one's type, and/or vice-versa. And if many people can't see in you what you see in yourself, that's either indicative of the ignorance of others, as you have stated, or of some more internal discrepancy that isn't being expressed properly.
It's not always like that though. But yeah if I don't like what they're saying I try to just ignore it or leave, but most of the time I enjoy it.
For people who think I'm INTp, I'd like to hear some evidence of me being Ni/Se.
i know you'll hate this, given that you've just posted a topic on how tereg is your most similar person on he planet, but i was entertaining ENFp for this guy based on slight similarities to tereg & what i think could be tendencies. i won't say for sure, but it's a hunch.
let's not no-true-scotsman this or whatever.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
If you are not IEI, you are SEI. The evidence is in your pictures, and the way you write/content. LSI (lol) would be another option, and if not ILE-Ti. I don't regard any Fi-Te type a viable option atm.
Last edited by xkj220; 11-17-2009 at 02:49 PM.
1. consensus among hobbyist psychologist don't count for much.1. General consensus on socionix
2. Love for Delta STs (not as much love for Gamma SFs)
3. Decidedly not of the judging variety (debatable?)
2. you don't know your own type yet, so you can not identify other types reliably yet either.
3. this is a good point.
How do you relate to the standard descriptions of Extrovert/Introvert, Logic/Etics and Intuition/Sensation?
Extroverts
are interested in what is happening around them
are open and often talkative
compare their own opinions with the opinions of others
like action and initiative
easily make new friends or adapt to a new group
say what they think
are interested in new people
easily break unwanted relations
Introverts
are interested in their own thoughts and feelings
need to have own territory
often appear reserved, quiet and thoughtful
usually do not have many friends
have difficulties in making new contacts
like concentration and quiet
do not like unexpected visits and therefore do not make them
work well alone
Sensing vs. Intuition
Sensing is an ability to deal with information on the basis of its physical qualities and its affection by other information. Intuition is an ability to deal with the information on the basis of its hidden potential and its possible existence. The most common differences between Sensing and Intuitive types are shown below:
Sensing types
see everyone and sense everything
live in the here and now
quickly adapt to any situation
like pleasures based on physical sensation
are practical and active
are realistic and self-confident
Intuitive types
are mostly in the past or in the future
worry about the future more than the present
are interested in everything new and unusual
do not like routine
are attracted more to the theory than the practice
often have doubts
Thinking vs. Feeling
Thinking is an ability to deal with information on the basis of its structure and its function. Feeling is an ability to deal with information on the basis of its initial energetic condition and its interactions. The most common differences between Thinking and Feeling type are shown below:
Thinking types
are interested in systems, structures, patterns
expose everything to logical analysis
are relatively cold and unemotional
evaluate things by intellect and right or wrong
have difficulties talking about feelings
do not like to clear up arguments or quarrels
Feeling types
are interested in people and their feelings
easily pass their own moods to others
pay great attention to love and passion
evaluate things by ethics and good or bad
can be touchy or use emotional manipulation
often give compliments to please people
I've taken several tests multiple times over the course of approximately a year, and generally come up with EII. In what way does EII have a flair of ENTp?
Alright, I've done some thinking, and is my case for me not valuing Ti:
I sat in on a couple of logic classes the past couple weeks here at school. I found these classes to be trivial and unhelpful. Part of that may just be due to the fact that I didn't understand the terminology, so I'll give them that. But the entire class is laid out where sentences are dumbed down to variables devoid of meaning or intrinsic definition other than true/false. I feel that without knowing what exactly these variables mean at first, the task of organizing them seems pointless. This reaction seems to be more of Te favoring as opposed to Ti, although I could be wrong.
Last edited by Galen; 12-11-2009 at 04:08 PM.
Are you enjoying this attention we're giving you, Arctures?